UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section Section��14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

x

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

¨

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

 

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

 

Soliciting Material under Rule14a-12

THE WENDY’S COMPANY

Name of the Registrant as Specified In Its Charter

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x

 

No fee required.

¨

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(4) and0-11.

 1. 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 2. 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 3. 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 4. 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 5. 

Total fee paid:

 

 

¨

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 1. 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 2. 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 3. 

Filing Party:

 

 4. 

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 


LOGOLOGO

The Wendy’s Company®
Notice of 2018 annual meeting
of stockholders & proxy statement


LOGO

LOGO

 

The Wendy’s Company

One Dave Thomas Boulevard

Dublin, Ohio 43017

(614) 764-3100

April 11, 201620, 2018

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

It is our pleasureWe are pleased to invite you to join us at the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of The Wendy’s Company (the “Company”), which will be held on Thursday, May 26, 2016,Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (EDT). The Annual Meeting will be held at the Thomas Conference Center located at the Company’s corporate offices at One Dave Thomas Boulevard, Dublin, Ohio 43017. The Board of Directors and management hope that you will be able to attend the Annual Meeting.

The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. AtMeeting is described in the Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting we willof Stockholders and Proxy Statement. We also reviewlook forward to reporting on the Company’s 20152017 performance, plans for continued global growth and discuss our plans to continue deliveringdriving stockholder value to you, our stockholders.

The Company’s successful performance in 2015 built on a history of strong results and is a testament to the relevance of the Wendy’s® brand with today’s consumers, the customer-focused commitment of our restaurant teams and our exceptional base of growth-oriented franchisees. In 2015, we unlocked the strength of our core brand business and our rich food heritage, achieving an attractive balance between core menu items, premium LTOs and value offerings. Featuring favorites like Baconator®, innovative new items like the Jalapeño Fresco Spicy Chicken Sandwich and Ghost Pepper Fries and the launch of our 4 for $4 Meal, our marketing and operations initiatives drove 3.3% growth in North America system same restaurant sales and profitable customer count growth.

Our “Image Activation” restaurant reimaging program continues to transform the face of the brand at the restaurant level and is delivering in a highly effective way. In 2015, the Wendy’s North America system reimaged 450 restaurants and built 70 new restaurants. As of the end of 2015, the Wendy’s system was 22% reimaged, putting us well on track to reach our 2020 goals of opening 1,000 new restaurants and having at least 60% of system restaurants on our Image Activation design. We have an incredible partnership with our franchise community on Image Activation, new restaurant development and other brand initiatives. We are grateful for their steadfast commitment to investing in the Wendy’s brand and providing our customers with a Deliciously DifferentTM restaurant experience.

The combination of strong sales momentum and the acceleration of Image Activation has also contributed to significant growth in North America restaurant average unit volumes. In 2015, AUVs for system restaurants increased by 3.4% to anall-time high of $1.54 million, and we remain on track to achieve our 2020 goal of $2.0 million AUVs. Through our strong core business performance, we exceeded our financial goals for 2015, as Company restaurant margins improved 190 basis points, adjusted EBITDA increased 10% and adjusted earnings per share grew 14% from the prior year.corporate endeavors.

We also took substantial positive steps in 2015 to enhance our economic model and capital structure to support long-term income and growth for stockholders. We refinanced our long-term debt by completing a $2.275 billion whole business securitization and used the net proceeds to return $1.2 billion in cash to our stockholders through share repurchases and dividends. At the same time, we continued to invest in the reimaging of our restaurants, new restaurant development and technology initiatives to connect with our customers and drive productivity in our restaurants.

In 2015, we continued to strengthen the Wendy’s franchise system through our “System Optimization” initiative. We sold 327 Company-operated restaurants in the U.S. and Canada to strong franchise operators who are dedicated to people development, Image Activation and new restaurant growth. We believe System Optimization will continue to drive us towards a more predictable and sustainable earnings growth model as we transition to a 95% franchised system. In addition to the sale of Company-operated restaurants, we also played an active role in facilitating franchisee-to-franchisee restaurant transfers, as some franchisees move into retirement while others seek to grow. This ongoing System Optimization at the franchise level strengthens our brand and gives growth-oriented franchisees an opportunity to expand their presence within the Wendy’s system.


Beyond our strong business performance, the heart of the Wendy’s brand lies in our rich family culture and the core values left to us by our founder, Dave Thomas. We steadfastly support the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption® and its tireless efforts to find permanent, loving homes for children waiting in the foster care system. We surpassed a milestone in 2015 by celebrating the adoption of the 5,000th child through the Wendy’s Wonderful Kids® program, but we recognize that so many more children need and deserve our help. We will continue to rely on the strength of the Wendy’s brand and the passionate advocacy of our franchisees, employees and suppliers to raise awareness and funds for children who are waiting to find their forever families. We encourage you to visitwww.davethomasfoundation.org orwww.aboutwendys.com to learn more about this worthy cause.

Finally, we encourage you to participate in the Annual Meeting by voting your shares – regardless ofMeeting. Please refer to the size of your holdings. Every vote is important,Proxy Statement for information regarding attendance and your participation enables us to listen and act on what matters to you as a stockholder. Accordingly,admission requirements. Also, whether or not you plan to attend, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting, pleaseMeeting. Please promptly completecast your vote by completing and returnreturning your proxy card in the enclosed envelope or submitto the address indicated on your proxy card or voting instruction form. You may also cast your vote by telephone or via the Internet as described in the instructions included with your proxy card.materials. If you attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote your shares in person, you may revoke your previously submitted proxy as explained in the Proxy Statement.

We thankThank you for your continued support as a stockholder ofand investment in The Wendy’s Company, and we look forward to a fulfilling and successful 2016.Company.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOLOGO

LOGO

EMIL J. BROLICK

TODD A. PENEGOR

President and Chief Executive Officer

President and Chief Financial Officer

LOGO

LOGOLOGO

 

LOGO

LOGO


LOGOLOGO

NOTICE OF 20162018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, May 26, 2016,Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 10:00 a.m. (EDT)

 

 

The 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of The Wendy’s Company (the “Company”) will be held on Thursday, May 26, 2016,Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) at the Thomas Conference Center located at the Company’s corporate offices at One Dave Thomas Boulevard, Dublin, Ohio 43017.

 

ITEMSOF BUSINESS

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to:

 

(1)

Elect 11 directors to hold office until the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders;

 

 

(2)

Approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to provide stockholders with a “proxy access” right;

(3)(2)

Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016;2018;

 

 

(4)(3)

Vote on an advisory resolution to approve executive compensation; and

 

 

(5)(4)

Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

 

RECORD DATE

The record date for the Annual Meeting is March 28, 2016. All

The record date for the Annual Meeting is April 9, 2018. Only holders of record of shares of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to vote on all business transacted at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

VOTING YYOUROUR PROXY

Your vote is important! Stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend, please promptly complete and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope, or submit your proxy by telephone or via the Internet as described in the instructions included with your proxy card. You may vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting.

 

ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION

For your comfort and security, admission

Admission to the Annual Meeting will be by ticket only. If you are a registered stockholder (i.e., your shares are held in your name) and plan to attend the Annual Meeting, your admission ticket is either your notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials or the top portion of your proxy card, whichever you have received. If you are a beneficial owner (i.e., your shares are held by a broker, bank or other holder of record) and plan to attend the Annual Meeting, your admission ticket is either your notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials or the top portion of your voting instruction form, whichever you have received. Stockholders who do not obtain admission tickets in advance may obtain them upon verification of ownership at the registration desk on the day of the Annual Meeting.If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please read the Proxy Statement for important information about admission requirements for the Annual Meeting will be by admission ticket only, and you will also be required to present a valid government-issued identification and valid proof of stock ownership as of the record date. If you are a registered stockholder (i.e., your shares are held in your name), your admission ticket is either your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) or the top portion of your proxy card, whichever you have received. If you are a beneficial owner (i.e., your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee), your admission ticket is either your Notice of Internet Availability or the top portion of your voting instruction form, whichever you have received. In addition, if you are a beneficial owner, you must also provide a legal proxy from the record holder to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.Please read the Proxy Statement for additional important information about Annual Meeting admission requirements.

By Order of the Board of Directors:

 

LOGO

DANA KLEINLOGO

E. J. WUNSCH

AssistantChief Legal Officer and Secretary

April 11, 201620, 2018

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to be held on May 26, 2016:June 5, 2018: This Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement

and the 20152017 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at:atwww.proxyvote.com.

 


PROXY STATEMENT – TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  

Page

 

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

   1 

How to Cast Your Vote

   1 

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

   1 

Director Nominees

   2 

Corporate Governance Highlights

   23 

20152017 Business Performance and Executive Compensation Program Highlights

   3 

THE ANNUAL MEETING

   5 

Annual Meeting Details

   5 

Voting Your Proxy

   5 

Annual Meeting Admission

   5 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

   6 

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

   109 

Director Nominee Qualifications and Biographical Information

   1110 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   1821 

Board Leadership Structure

   1821 

Board Membership Criteria and Director Nominations

   1821 

Director Independence

   19

Board Meetings and Attendance

2022 

Board Committees and Related Matters

   2023

Attendance at Board and Committee Meetings, Annual Meeting

24 

Audit Committee

   2124 

Compensation Committee and Performance Compensation Subcommittee

   22

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

22

Other Board Committees

22

Executive Sessions of the Board

23

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

23

Compensation Risk Management

23

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Related Governance Policies

24

Board’s Role in Succession Planning

25

Board and Committee Evaluations

25

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE—RESPONSIBILITIES AND GOVERNANCE

26

Scope of Authority and Responsibilities

26

Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors

26 

Authority to Delegate

   26 

Role of Compensation Consultants and Other Advisersin the Executive Compensation Process

   2726 

Management’s Role ofin the Executive OfficersCompensation Process

   27 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   27

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

28

Other Board Committees

28

Executive Sessions of the Board

28

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

28

Compensation Risk Assessment

29

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Related Governance Policies

30

Board’s Role in Succession Planning

30

Board and Committee Evaluations

31 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

   2932 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

   3033 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis – At a GlanceNamed Executive Officers (NEOs)

   3033 

20152017 Executive Summary

   3033 

A Philosophy of Pay for PerformancePay-for-Performance

   3235 

Objectives of the Executive Compensation Program

   3235 

Emphasis on Variable Compensation

   3235 

Strong Pay-for-Performance Alignment of CEO Compensation and Company Performance

   3336 

Elements of Executive Compensation

   3438 

How Executive Compensation is Determined

   3438

Incentive Compensation Performance Metrics

39

2017Non-GAAP Financial Measures

40 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        i


Compensation Decisions for 20152017

   3540 

Base Salary

   3540

Guiding Principles for Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plans

40 

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

   3540 

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

   3742 

Additional Compensation Decisions

   3843 

Vesting of 20122014 Performance Unit Awards

   38

Transition of President and Chief Executive Officer Roles

3943 

Changes to the Executive Compensation Program for 20162018

   3944 

Compensation Governance Matters

   4045 

Clawback Provisions in Equity Awards

   4045 

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

   4045 

Anti-Hedging Policy

   4046 

Tax and Accounting Considerations

   4046

Deferred Compensation Plan

47 

Consideration and Frequency of Annual StockholderSay-on-Pay Vote

   4147 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  

20152017 Summary Compensation Table

   4248 

20152017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

   4551 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 2017Year-End

   4753 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 20152017

   49

2015 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

5055 

Employment Agreements

51

Arrangements and Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change in Control

   5456

Pay Ratio Disclosure

60 

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

   5761 

20152017 Director Compensation

   5862 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   6064 

STOCK OWNERSHIP AND RETENTION GUIDELINES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

   6267 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   6368 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   6671 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

   6772 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

   6974 

Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions

   6974 

Certain Related Person Transactions Since the Beginning of 2015

   6974 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

   7075 

PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO PROVIDE STOCKHOLDERS WITH A “PROXY ACCESS” RIGHT

71

PROPOSAL 3 – RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

   7576 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

   7576 

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies and Procedures

   7576 

PROPOSAL 43 – ADVISORY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   7778 

OTHER MATTERS

   7980 

Other Matters to Come Before the Annual Meeting

   7980 

Contacting Directors

   7980 

Stockholder Proposals for 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

   7980

Bringing Stockholder Proposals Before the 2019 Annual Meeting

80

Stockholder Proposals Intended for Inclusion in 2019 Proxy Materials

80

Director Nominations Intended for Inclusion in 2019 Proxy Materials (Proxy Access)

81 

Householding of Annual Meeting Materials

   81 

Annual Report on Form10-K

81

Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices

   81 

ANNEX A –NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION AND CALCULATION TABLES AND DISCLOSURE
REGARDINGNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

   A-1 

ANNEX B – PROPOSED AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

B-1

 

ii        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement


LOGO    LOGO

  

The Wendy’s Company

One Dave Thomas Boulevard

Dublin, Ohio 43017

(614) 764-3100

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR 20162018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information about The Wendy’s Company (“Wendy’s” or the “Company”) and certain information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement for the Company’s 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 26, 2016,Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (EDT), and any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in voting your shares, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. For more complete information regarding the Company’s 20152017 performance, please review the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017 (the “2015“2017 Form10-K”). References in this Proxy Statement to “2015,“2017,“2014,“2016,“2013”“2015” and other years meanrefer to the Company’s fiscal yearsyear for the periodsrespective period indicated.

 

HOW TO CAST YOUR VOTE

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please cast your vote as soon as possible in one of the following ways:

 

LOGO LOGO LOGO
Internet Telephone Mail

 

Visitwww.proxyvote.comwww.proxyvote.com.. You will need the 12-digit number included in your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials.

Call (800) 690-6903. You will need the12-digit16-digit number included in your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice regardingNotice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

Call (800)690-6903. You will need the16-digit number included in your proxy card, voting instruction form or Notice of Internet availabilityAvailability of proxy materials.Proxy Materials.

 

 

Complete, sign and date your proxy card or voting instruction form and return it in the envelope provided or to the address indicated on your proxy card or voting instruction form.

 

 

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you will need to bring an admission ticket and photo identification. Ifare a beneficial owner (i.e., your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee,nominee) and plan to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, you will needbe required to bringprovide a “legal proxy”legal proxy from the record holder to vote those shares at the Annual Meeting. Also, please read the Proxy Statement for additional important information about Annual Meeting admission requirements for all stockholders.

 

 

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

 

    

 

MBANAGEMENTOARD PROPOSALS

 

BOARD VOTE
RECOMMENDATION

 

PAGE REFERENCE

(FOR MORE DETAIL)

 

Proposal 1:

  

 

Election of 11 directorsdirectors.

 

 

FOR
each nominee

 

 

9

10

Proposal 2:

Approval of amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to provide stockholders with a “proxy access” right

FOR71

Proposal 3:

  

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20162018.

 FOR 76
75

Proposal 4:

3:

  

Advisory resolution to approve executive compensation

compensation.

 FOR

 

77

78

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        1


DIRECTOR NOMINEES

The following table provides summary information about the 11 director nominees. Additional information about each nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills can be found beginning on page 11.under the caption “Proposal 1—Election of Directors—Director Nominee Qualifications and Biographical Information.”

 

NAME

 

AGE

 

   

 

DIRECTOR

SINCE

 

  

OCCUPATION

 

  

INDEPENDENT

 

   

 

CURRENT BOARD

COMMITTEES (1)(2)

 

  

 

OTHER PUBLIC

BOARDS

 

  AGE DIRECTOR
SINCE
 OCCUPATION INDEPENDENT CURRENT BOARD
COMMITTEES (1)(2)
 OTHER PUBLIC
BOARDS

Nelson Peltz

 73   1993  Chief Executive Officer and founding partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P.    CSR*, Executive*  3  75 1993 (3) Chief Executive Officer and Founding Partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P.  CSR*, Executive* 3

Peter W. May

 73   1993  President and founding partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P.    C&I*, CSR, Executive  1  75 1993 (3) President and Founding Partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P.    CI*, Compensation, CSR, Executive, Tech* 1

Emil J. Brolick

 68   2011  Chief Executive Officer of
The Wendy’s Company
    C&I, Executive  

Janet Hill

 68   2008  Principal at Hill Family Advisors  ü     Compensation  2

Kristin A. Dolan

  52 2017 Chief Executive Officer and Founder of 605 LLC    Tech 4

Kenneth W. Gilbert

  67 2017 Former Chief Marketing Officer of VOSS of Norway ASA    CSR, Tech 

Dennis M. Kass

 65   2015  Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Jennison Associates, LLC   ü      1  67 2015 Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Jennison Associates, LLC    Audit, Compensation 

Joseph A. Levato

 75   1996  Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Triarc Companies, Inc. (predecessor to The Wendy’s Company)   ü    Audit*, B&I, Compensation, CSR    77 1996 (3) Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Triarc Companies, Inc. (predecessor to The Wendy’s Company)    

Audit, Compensation,

Executive, NCG

 

Michelle “Mich” J.

Mathews-Spradlin

 49   2015  Former Chief Marketing Officer and Senior Vice President of Microsoft Corporation   ü    Compensation    51 2015 Former Chief Marketing Officer and Senior Vice President of Microsoft Corporation    Compensation, CSR, Tech 

Matthew H. Peltz

 33   2015  Partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P.        35 2015 Senior Analyst and Partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P.  CI, CSR, Tech — (4)

Todd A. Penegor

 50     President and Chief Financial Officer of
The Wendy’s Company
        52 2016 President and Chief Executive Officer of The Wendy’s Company  CI, Executive 

Peter H. Rothschild

 60   2010  Managing Member of Daroth Capital LLC   ü    Audit, N&CG    62 2010 Managing Member of Daroth Capital LLC    Audit, Compensation*, NCG* 

Arthur B. Winkleblack

 58     Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of H. J. Heinz Company   ü      2  60 2016 Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of H. J. Heinz Company    Audit*, NCG 2

 

(1)

 B&I: Benefits and Investment;C&I:

CI: Capital and Investment;

CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility;N&CG  NCG: Nominating and  Corporate Governance;* Committee  Tech: Technology;  *Committee Chair.

(2)

(2)

 

It is anticipated that the Board of Directors will determine committee assignments at the Board’s organizational meeting immediately following the Annual Meeting.

(3)

Messrs. N. Peltz, May and Levato have been directors of the Company since September 2008, when the Company commenced its current business—the ownership and franchising of the Wendy’s restaurant system. Messrs. Peltz and May served as directors of the Company’s predecessor companies from April 1993, and Mr. Levato from June 1996, until September 2008 when Wendy’s International, Inc. merged with Triarc Companies, Inc., the predecessor to The Wendy’s Company.

(4)

Following the separation of the water and electrical businesses of Pentair plc into two independent publicly traded companies, which is targeted to occur on April 30, 2018, Mr. Peltz will become a member of the board of directors of Pentair plc.

 

 

2        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

The Company is committed to maintaining strong corporate governance practices as a critical component of driving sustained stockholder value. Our Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) continually monitors emerging best practices in corporate governance to serve the interests of our stockholders. Highlights of our current governance practices are set forth below.

 

 

BOARDOF DIRECTORS

 

   

STOCKHOLDER INTERESTS

 

   

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

•  Annual election of directorsdirectors.

•  Majority voting for directors in uncontested elections with director resignation policypolicy.

•  Separation of our Board Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOfficer.

•  Majority independent BoardBoard.

•  Fully independent key Board committeescommittees.

•  RegularRegularly scheduled executive sessions ofnon-employee and independent directorsdirectors.

•  Over 98%97% average Board and committee meeting attendance in 20152017.

•  Active Board and committee oversight of risk managementmanagement.

•  ComprehensiveCorporate Governance Guidelines andCode of Business Conduct and Ethics.

•  Annual limit on cash and equity awards granted tonon-employee directorsdirectors.

  

•  No stockholder rights plan or “poison pill”pill.”

•  Stockholders have the ability to act by written consentconsent.

•  Stockholders have the ability to call special meetingsmeetings.

•  No supermajority voting requirementsrequirements.

•  No exclusive forum selection clauseclause.

•  Certificate of Incorporation provides stockholders with a “proxy access” right.

•  No fee-shifting bylaw provisions

•  Management proposal to provide stockholders with “proxy access“ rightfee-shiftingBy-law provisions.

  

•  Annual “say-on-pay”say-on-pay advisory votevote.

•  Strongpay-for-performance philosophy with emphasis onat-risk compensationcompensation.

•  Multiple performance metrics in annual and long-term incentive plans.

•  Limited perquisites and benefits.

•  Engage independent outside compensation consultantsconsultants.

•  Limited perquisites and benefits

•  No pension or SERP benefits

•  “Clawback”Clawback provisions in our 2010 Omnibus Award PlanPlan.

•  No speculative trading or hedging transactionstransactions.

•  “Double trigger” required for change in control equity vestingvesting.

•  Significant stock ownership and retention guidelinesguidelines.

 

2        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


20152017 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

During 2015,

During 2017, the Company achieved strong operating and financial results and continued delivering on the Wendy’s® brand promise to Delight Every Customer™ and execute every element of The Wendy’s Way by investing in the quality of our food and providing great value, exceptional service and an elevated restaurant experience. Led by President and Chief Executive Officer Todd Penegor and our senior leadership team, the Company drove significant improvements in the corporate and restaurant-level economic model, continued to strengthen the Wendy’s franchise system and created significant value for stockholders. We achieved significant year-over-year improvements in our key operating and financial metrics, persisted in transforming our brand through global restaurant development and image activation, completed our transition to a predominantly franchised business model and returned $196 million in cash to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases. Through our strong operating results and execution of our strategic initiatives, we delivered cumulative total stockholder return of 24% in 2017, 96% on a three-year basis and 289% on a five-year basis.

Our executive compensation program is designed to support the Company’s business objectives by linking executive pay to individual performance, the Company’s attainment of annual and multi-year operating and financial goals and the creation of long-term stockholder value. In accordance with ourpay-for-performance philosophy, variable (i.e.,at-risk) incentives constituted the most significant portion of total direct compensation for 2017 for our Chief Executive Officer (83%) and other Named Executive Officers as a group (71%). (Our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) are identified under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Named Executive Officers.”)

        The Wendy’s Company achieved strong operating and financial results and continued to delight our customers by delivering “A Cut Above” restaurant experience. Led by Chief Executive Officer Emil J. Brolick, Chief Financial Officer Todd A. Penegor and the rest of our senior leadership team, the Company drove significant improvements in the corporate and restaurant-level economic model, accelerated the transformation of the Wendy’s® brand and continued to strengthen the Wendy’s franchise system. We achieved significant year-over-year improvements in our key operating and financial metrics, sustained our strong momentum with new restaurant development and our “Image Activation” restaurant reimaging program, continued our transition towards a predominantly franchised business model and returned $1.2 billion in cash to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases. Through our strong operating results and execution of our strategic initiatives, we delivered total stockholder return of 21% in 2015 and 144% on a 3-year basis.2018 Proxy Statement        3

2015 was also highlighted by the implementation of thoughtful succession planning, as the Company announced that Mr. Brolick planned to retire from management duties with the Company in May 2016. As part of the succession plan, Mr. Penegor was appointed President of the Company effective January 4, 2016, and Mr. Penegor is expected to succeed Mr. Brolick in the Chief Executive Officer role after a transition period that began in the first quarter of 2016. Mr. Brolick is expected to continue to serve on the Board of Directors upon his retirement to ensure continuity of leadership and strategic focus for the Company.

Our executive compensation program is designed to support the Company’s business objectives by linking executive pay to individual performance, the Company’s attainment of annual and multi-year operating and financial goals and the creation of long-term stockholder value. In accordance with our pay-for-performance philosophy, variable (“at-risk”) incentives constituted the most significant portion of total direct compensation for 2015 for our Chief Executive Officer (82%) and other named executive officers as a group (69%).


The primary components of our 20152017 executive compensation program are summarized in the table below and are further described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 30.in this Proxy Statement.

 

ELEMENT

  

AT-RISK

  

FORM

  

METRICS

  

PURPOSE

Base Salary

  

No

  Cash    

Attract and retain highly-qualifiedhighly qualified executives by providing an appropriatea competitive level of fixed cash compensation that reflects the experience, responsibilities and performance of each executiveexecutive.

Annual IncentiveCash

Incentives

  

Yes

  Cash  

•  Adjusted EBITDA (70%(60%)

Same Restaurant•  Same-Restaurant Sales (30%

    (North America) (40%)

  

Align executive pay with individual and Company performance by motivating and rewarding executives over aone-year time frame period based on the achievement of strategic business and financial objectivesobjectives.

Long-Term

Equity Incentives

  

Yes

  

Equity

•  Stock Options (60%(50%)

•  Performance Units (40%(50%)

  

Share Price

•  Adjusted EPS (50%)

•  Relative TSR (50%)

  

Align the interests of executives with the interests of stockholders and retain highly-qualifiedhighly qualified executives by motivating and rewarding executives overto achieve multi-year strategic business objectives. Create a multi-year time frame based ondirect link between executive pay and the long-term performance of our Common Stock and the achievement of strategic business and financial objectivesStock.

Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, the base salaries, target total cash compensation and target total direct compensation of our senior executives for 2015, on average,2017 fell within thea competitive range of market median.median, in the aggregate. The Company’s strong salesoperating and financial performance in 20152017 supported an annual cash incentive payout at 152.6%109.0% of target, prior to adjustment for individual performance.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        3


Summary compensation informationperformance for our named executive officers for 2015 is summarized inexecutives other than the following table (excluding Darrell G. van Ligten and Craig S. Bahner, who left the Company prior to the end of 2015). These amounts are presented in accordance with accounting assumptions and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, and the amounts that executives actually receive may vary substantially from what is reported in the equity awards columns of the table.Chief Executive Officer.

NAMEAND

PRINCIPAL POSITION

 

  

SALARY

(S)

 

   

BONUS

($)

 

   

STOCK

AWARDS

($)

 

   

OPTION
AWARDS

($)

 

   

 

NON-EQUITY

INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION

($)

 

   

ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION

($)

 

  

TOTAL

($)

 

Emil J. Brolick

Chief Executive Officer

   1,168,904          1,499,991     2,249,998     3,290,438    68,915  8,278,246

Todd A. Penegor

President and

Chief Financial Officer

   679,863          399,993     599,998     965,672    30,200  2,675,726

Robert D. Wright

Executive Vice President,

Chief Operations Officer

   490,479          359,992     539,999     638,345    30,200  2,059,015

R. Scott Toop

Former Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary

   491,822          263,986     395,998     560,805    30,200  1,742,811

Scott A. Weisberg

Chief People Officer

   419,329          219,992     330,000     546,213    30,200  1,545,734

We encourage you to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 30in this Proxy Statement for a detailed discussion of how our executive compensation program was designed and implemented in 20152017 to achieve our overall compensation objectives. Stockholders should also review the “2015“2017 Summary Compensation Table” on page 42, as well as theand other related compensation tables, notes and narrative,narratives in this Proxy Statement, which provide detailed information regarding the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs for 2015.

2017.

 

4        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement


THE ANNUAL MEETING

Annual Meeting DetailsANNUAL MEETING DETAILS

The accompanying proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors of The Wendy’s Company in connection with the Company’s 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 26, 2016,Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) at the Thomas Conference Center located at the Company’s corporate offices at One Dave Thomas Boulevard, Dublin, Ohio 43017, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Directions to the Annual Meeting are available on the Company’sour website atwww.aboutwendys.comwww.wendys.com/who-we-are. This Proxy Statement and an accompanying proxy card will first be mailed to stockholders, or made available to stockholders electronically via the Internet, on or about April  [13], 2016.23, 2018.

Voting Your ProxyVOTING YOUR PROXY

When a stockholder returns a proxy card that is properly signed and dated, the shares represented by the proxy card will be voted by the persons named as proxies in the proxy card in accordance with the stockholder’s instructions. Stockholders may specify their choices by marking the appropriate boxes on their proxy card. If a proxy card is signed, dated and returned by a stockholder without specifying choices, the shares represented by the proxy card will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors. The Company does not have cumulative voting.

Pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended and restated, the “Certificate of Incorporation”) andBy-Laws (as amended and restated, the “By-Laws”“By-Laws”), business transacted at the Annual Meeting is limited to the purposes stated in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. Except for the proposals described in this Proxy Statement, no other matters currently are intended to be brought before the Annual Meeting by the Company or, to the Company’s knowledge, any other person. The proxy being solicited by the Board does, however, convey discretionary authority to the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card to vote on any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. A proxy may be revoked by a stockholder at any time prior to the time it is voted by giving notice of revocation either personally or in writing to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at our corporate offices at the Company’s principal executive offices.address provided under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices.”

Annual Meeting AdmissionANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION

Only holders of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Common Stock”), at the close of business on March 28, 2016,April 9, 2018, their authorized representatives and invited guests of the Company will be able to attend the Annual Meeting. For your comfort and security, admission to the Annual Meeting will be by admission ticket only, and packages and bags may be inspected and required to be checked in at the registration desk. Youyou will also will be required to present a valid government-issued photo identification.identification and valid proof of stock ownership as of the April 9, 2018 record date (such as a bank or brokerage account statement or a letter from the bank or broker verifying that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on the record date). In addition, if you are a beneficial owner (i.e., your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee), you must also provide a legal proxy from the record holder to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

If you are a registered stockholder (i.e., your shares are held in your name) and plan to attend the Annual Meeting, your admission ticket is either your notice regarding theNotice of Internet availabilityAvailability of proxy materialsProxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) or the top portion of your proxy card, whichever you have received. If you are a beneficial owner (i.e., your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other holder of record) and plan to attend the Annual Meeting, your admission ticket is either your notice regarding theNotice of Internet availability of proxy materialsAvailability or the top portion of your voting instruction form, whichever you have received. In addition, you can

You may also obtain an admission ticket in advance of the Annual Meeting by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices. Please be sure toaddress of our corporate offices provided under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices.” With your written request, you must enclose valid proof of stock ownership such as a bank or brokerage account statement or a letter from the bank or broker verifying that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on March 28, 2016.record date and a copy of your admission ticket, as described above. Stockholders who do not obtain admission tickets in advance ofbut plan to attend the Annual Meeting may obtain them upon verification of ownership atmust satisfy the registration desk on the day of the Annual Meeting.admission requirements described above. The Company may issue admission tickets to persons other than stockholders in itsthe Company’s sole discretion.

Stockholders who hold shares of our Common Stock in a joint account may be admitted to the Annual Meeting if they provide valid proof of joint stock ownership as of the record date and both stockholders satisfy the other admission requirements described above.

If you are the representative of a corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other legal entity that holds shares of our Common Stock, you must bring acceptable evidence of your authority to represent that legal entity at the Annual Meeting. Please note that only one representative may attend the Annual Meeting on behalf of each legal entity that holds shares of our Common Stock.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        5


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

 Q:

Who is soliciting my proxy?

 

 

 A:

Wendy’sThe Company’s Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. Certain of our directors, officers and employees also may solicit proxies on the Board’s behalf by personal contact, telephone, mail,e-mail or other means. The Company has hired Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10022, to assist in soliciting proxies from brokers, banks and other stockholders.

 

 

 Q:

What should I do with these materials?

 

 

 A:

Please carefully read and consider the information contained in this Proxy Statement, and then vote your shares as soon as possible to ensure that your shares will be represented at the Annual Meeting. You may vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

 

 

 Q:

What am I being asked to vote on?

 

 

 A:

You are being asked to vote on the following fourthree proposals:

 

 

 (1)

To elect 11 directors to hold office until the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders;

 

 

 (2)

To approve amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to provide stockholders with a “proxy access” right;

(3)

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016;2018; and

 

 

 (4)(3)

To approve an advisory resolution to approve executive compensation.

 

 

 Q:

How do I vote?

 

 

 A:

You may vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting in any of the following ways:

 

 

  

Visit the website shown on your notice regarding theNotice of Internet availability of proxy materials,Availability, proxy card or voting instruction form to vote via the Internet;

 

 

  

Use the toll-free telephone number shown on your notice regarding theNotice of Internet availability of proxy materials,Availability, proxy card or voting instruction form to vote by telephone; or

 

 

  

Complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form in the enclosed postage-paid envelope if you have requested and received our proxy materials by mail.

 

If you are a registered stockholder, you may also vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares in street name, then you must obtain a “legal proxy”legal proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds the shares on your behalf in order to vote those shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

 

 Q:

Who is entitled to vote?

 

 

 A:

All holders of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on March 28, 2016,April 9, 2018, the record date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to vote on all business transacted at the Annual Meeting.

 

 

 Q:

What is the deadline for submitting a proxy?

 

 

 A:

In order to be counted, proxies submitted by telephone or via the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on Wednesday, May 25, 2016.Monday, June 4, 2018. Proxies submitted by mail must be received prior to the start of the Annual Meeting.

 

 

 Q:

What is the difference between a registered stockholder and a “street name” holder?

 

 

 A:

If your shares are registered directly in your name with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, our stock transfer agent, you are considered a stockholder of record, or a registered stockholder, of those shares.

 

If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Your broker, bank or other nominee should have enclosed, or should provide you with, a notice regarding theNotice of Internet availability of proxy materialsAvailability or a voting instruction form for you to use in directing it on how to vote your shares.

 

6        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


 Q:

What constitutes a quorum?

 

 

 A:

At the close of business on March 28, 2016,April 9, 2018, the Company had 268,700,765239,924,148 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder to one vote on each

6        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all stockholders are entitled to cast at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum. Abstentions and “brokernon-votes” (described below) will be included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

 

 

 Q:

What are abstentions and brokernon-votes and how do they affect voting?

 

 

 A:

Abstentions.If you specify on your proxy card that you “abstain” from voting on an item, your shares will be counted as present and entitled to vote for the purpose of establishing a quorum. Abstentions will be the equivalent of an “against” vote on proposals that require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (Proposal 2) or the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (Proposals 32 and 4)3). Abstentions will not be included in the tabulation of voting results for proposals that require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast (Proposal 1).

 

BrokerNon-Votes.Under the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”), if your shares are held in street name, then your broker has discretion to vote your shares without instructions from you on certain “routine” proposals, such as the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3)2). Your broker does not, however, have such discretion on the election of directors (Proposal 1), the approval of amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation (Proposal 2) or the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal 4)3). If you do not provide your broker with voting instructions for these proposals, then your broker will be unable to vote on these proposals and will report your shares as “brokernon-votes” on these proposals. Like abstentions, brokernon-votes are counted as present for the purpose of establishing a quorum, but, unlike abstentions, they are not counted for the purpose of determining the number of shares present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote on particular proposals. As a result, brokernon-votes will not be included in the tabulation of voting results for proposals that require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast (Proposal 1) or the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (Proposal 4), and broker non-votes will be the equivalent of votes “against” proposals that require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (Proposal 2)3). Because brokers are entitled to vote on Proposal 3,2, we do not anticipate any brokernon-votes with regard to that proposal.

 

 Q:

What vote is needed to elect the 11 director nominees (Proposal 1)?

 

 

 A:

Pursuant to ourBy-Laws, each of the 11 director nominees must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to that nominee’s election in order to be elected as a director at the Annual Meeting.

 

 

 Q:

What vote is needed to approve the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation (Proposal 2)?

 A:

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to provide stockholders with a “proxy access” right. If you hold shares of Common Stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee will vote your shares for you if you provide instructions on how to vote the shares. In the absence of your instructions, however, brokers, banks and other nominees do not have the authority to vote your shares for the approval of the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation. Therefore, it is important that you provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, so that your shares may be voted on this proposal.

Q:

What vote is needed to ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3)2)?

 

 

A:

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.2018 (Proposal 2).

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        7


Q:

What vote is needed to approve the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal 4)3)?

 

 

A:

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the advisory resolution to approve the 2017 executive compensation of our NEOs (Proposal 4)3). ThisThe vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will review the voting results of this proposalProposal 3 and take those results into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation as itthe Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

 

 

 Q:

How do Nelson Peltz and Peter W. May intend to vote?

 

 

 A:

The Company has been informed that the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of the record date by Nelson Peltz and Peter W. May representing, in the aggregate, approximately 21.0%20.8% of the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting, will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of DirectorsFOR the election of each of the 11 director nominees named in Proposal 1 andFOR Proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

 

 

 Q:

If I deliver my signed proxy card or voting instruction form but do not indicate how I want to vote on the proposals, how will my shares be voted?

 

 

 A:

If you submit your proxy card or voting instruction form but do not indicate how you want to vote on the proposals, your proxy will be counted as a vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of DirectorsFOR the election of each of the 11 director nominees named in Proposal 1 andFOR Proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        7


 Q:

Can I change my vote after I have delivered my proxy card or voting instruction form?

 

 

 A:

Yes. You can change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting by revoking your proxy. You can revoke your proxy by giving notice of revocation either personally or in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the address of our corporate offices provided under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices.” You also can revoke your proxy by submitting a later-dated proxy by mail, by telephone, via the Internet or by attending and voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting by itself will not revoke a previously submitted proxy.

 

You can revoke your proxy by giving notice of revocation either personally or in writing to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices. You also can revoke your proxy by submitting alater-dated proxy by mail, by telephone, via the Internet or by attending and voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting alone will not revoke a previously-submitted proxy.

If your shares are held in an account with a broker, bank or other nominee, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee if you wish to change your vote or revoke your proxy.

 

 Q:

Why did I receive a notice regarding theNotice of Internet availabilityAvailability of proxy materialsProxy Materials rather than the printed Proxy Statement and 2015 annual report2017 Annual Report to stockholders?Stockholders?

 

 

 A:

As permitted by SEC rules, we are making our proxy materials available to stockholders electronically via the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com. On or about April [13], 2016,23, 2018, we will begin mailing a noticethe Notice of Internet Availability to our stockholders containing information on how to access our proxy materials and vote online.online or request a printed copy of the proxy materials. If you received that notice, then you will not receive a printed copy of our proxy materials unless you request a printed copy by following the instructions contained in the notice.Notice of Internet Availability. Adopting this “notice and access” process allows us to reduce the overall costs, as well as the environmental impact, of printing and mailing our proxy materials.

 

 

 Q:

What does it mean if I receive more than one notice regarding theNotice of Internet availabilityAvailability of proxy materials,Proxy Materials, proxy card or voting instruction form?

 

 

 A:

If you receive more than one notice regarding theNotice of Internet availability of proxy materials,Availability, proxy card or voting instruction form, this means that you have multiple accounts with our stock transfer agent or with brokers, banks or other nominees. Please follow the instructions set forth on each notice regarding theNotice of Internet availability of proxy materials,Availability, proxy card or voting instruction form you receive to ensure that all your shares are voted.

 

 

 Q:

Who will bear the expenses of this solicitation?

 

 

 A:

The Company will pay the costs and expenses of this solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mailing our proxy materials to stockholders and by making our proxy materials available to stockholders electronically via the Internet, proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers and employees by personal contact, telephone, mail,e-mail or other means without additional compensation. Solicitation of proxies will also be made by employees of Innisfree M&A Incorporated, our proxy solicitation firm, who will be paid a fee of $20,000, plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses. As is customary, we will also reimburse banks, brokers, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable costs and expenses incurred in forwarding our proxy materials to beneficial owners of our Common Stock.

 

 

8        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


 Q:

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

 

 

 A:

We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final voting results in a Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of the Annual Meeting. After the Form8-K has been filed, you may obtain a copy by visiting the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov or by visiting our Company website atwww.aboutwendys.comwww.wendys.com/who-we-are.

 

 

 Q:

Whom should I call with questions?

 

 

 A:

Please call Innisfree M&A Incorporated, the Company’s proxy solicitor, toll-free at (888)750-5834 with any questions about the Annual Meeting. Banks, brokers and other nominees may call collect at (212)750-5833.

 

 

8        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        9


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Item 1 on the Company’s Proxy Card)

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, there are 1112 members of our Board of Directors.

TwoOne of the Company’s current directors, Emil J. Randolph Lewis and David E. Schwab II – will not seek re-election andBrolick, will conclude theirhis service on the Board when their terms expirehis term expires at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Lewis is retiring from the BoardMeeting, after having served as a directormember of our Board since September 2011 when he joined the Company for eight yearsas our President and as a director of Wendy’s International, Inc. (“Wendy’s International”) for four years prior to its merger with the Company in 2008, andChief Executive Officer. Mr. Schwab is retiring from the Board after havingBrolick served as a director of the Company for 22 years. The Company has benefitted greatly from the distinguished serviceour President until January 2016 and outstanding contributions of Messrs. Lewis and Schwab during their Board tenure.

The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Todd A. Penegor and Arthur B. Winkleblack for election as directors of the Company at the Annual Meeting to fill the vacancies resulting from the retirement of Messrs. Lewis and Schwab.

In October 2015, the Company announced that Emil J. Brolick, our Chief Executive Officer planned to retireuntil his retirement from management duties with the Company in May 2016, and that Mr. Penegor, our Chief Financial Officer, was expected to succeed Mr. Brolick in the President and Chief Executive Officer role after a transition period beginning in the first quarter of 2016. As part of the succession plan, Mr. Penegor was appointed President of the Company effective January 4, 2016, and the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Mr. Penegor for election as a director of the Company at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Brolick is expected to continueHe continued to serve on the Board of Directors upon his retirement to ensure continuity of leadership and strategic focus for the Company.

Company, and we are grateful for Mr. Winkleblack was recommended toBrolick’s many contributions, outstanding service and distinguished leadership during his executive and Board tenure. The Board has determined that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by onesize of ournon-management directors, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other members of senior management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, after reviewing Mr. Winkleblack’s qualifications, making a determination as to his independence and considering the Board will be reduced from 12 to 11 members upon the expiration of Director’s needs, recommended to the Board that Mr. Winkleblack be nominated for election as a director of the CompanyBrolick’s term at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated the 11 persons named below for election as directors of the Company at the Annual Meeting. Other than Messrs. Penegor and Winkleblack, eachEach of the other nominees is presently serving as a director of the Company, and each of the other nominees was elected as a director at the Company’s 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders, except for Dennis M. Kass and Matthew H. Peltz.Kristin Dolan.

Mr. KassMs. Dolan joined the Board of Directors in December 2015July 2017 when the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, increased the size of the Board from 1011 to 1112 members and elected Mr. KassMs. Dolan to serve as a director of the Company for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting.

Mr. Peltz also joined the Board of Directors in December 2015 when the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, filled the vacancy resulting from Edward P. Garden’s resignation from the Board by electing Mr. Peltz to serve as a director of the Company for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting.

Each of Messrs. Kass and Peltz Ms. Dolan was recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by one of ournon-management directors in consultationafter consulting with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other members of senior management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, after reviewing Messrs. Kass’s and Peltz’sMs. Dolan’s qualifications, making a determination as to theirher independence and considering the needs of the Board of Director’s needs,Directors, recommended to the Board that Messrs. Kass and PeltzMs. Dolan be elected to serve as directorsa director of the Company.

The Board of Directors recommends that the 11 nominees named below be elected as directors of the Company at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of the nominees will hold office until the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal. The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card will voteFOR the election of each of the 11 nominees unless a stockholder directs otherwise.

10        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Each nominee has consented to be named and to continue to serve as a director if elected at the Annual Meeting. The Company is unaware of any reason why any nominee would be unwilling or unable to serve as a director if elected. Should, however, any nominee be unwilling or unable to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card will vote for the election of such substitute person for such directorship as the Board of Directors may recommend.

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        9


Director Nominee Qualifications and Biographical InformationDIRECTOR NOMINEE QUALIFICATIONSAND BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

 

NELSON PELTZ (CHAIRMAN)

 
   

Mr. Peltz has been a director of the Company since September 2008 when the Company commenced its current business, the ownership and franchising of the Wendy’s restaurant system. He served as a director of the Company’s predecessor companies from April 1993 anduntil September 2008, when Wendy’s International, Inc. merged with Triarc Companies, Inc. Mr. Peltz has served as ournon-executive Chairman since June 2007. He also served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and as a director or manager and an officer of certain of our subsidiaries from April 1993 through June 2007. Additionally, Mr. Peltz has been Chief Executive Officer and a founding partnerFounding Partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P. (“Trian Partners”), a management company for various investment funds and accounts, since November 2005. From January 1989 to April 1993, Mr. Peltz was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Trian Group, Limited Partnership, which provided investment banking and management services for entities controlled by Mr. Peltz and Peter W. May. From 1983 to December 1988, Mr. Peltz was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Triangle Industries, Inc., a metals and packaging company.

 

Mr. Peltz has also served as a director of Mondeléz International, Inc. since January 2014, Sysco Corporation since August 2015, and The Madison Square Garden Company since September 2015.2015 and The Procter & Gamble Company since March 2018. Mr. Peltz previously served as a director of H.J.H. J. Heinz Company from September 2006 to June 2013, Ingersoll RandIngersoll-Rand plc from August 2012 to June 2014, Legg Mason, Inc. from October 2009 to December 2014, and MSG Networks Inc. from December 2014 to September 2015.2015 and Mondelēz International, Inc. from January 2014 to March 2018.

 

Mr. Peltz is actively involved with various civic organizations and serves as HonoraryCo-Chairman of the board of trustees and Chairman of the board of governors of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a member of the honorary board of directors of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, ChairmanProstate Cancer Foundation, a member of the New York Tolerance Center and a board memberof overseers of the Weill Cornell Medical College and Graduate School of Medical Sciences, a member of the board of overseers of The Milken Institute, anda member of the Intrepid Museum Foundation.advisory council and an advisor and member of the executive council of No Labels, an organization that seeks to build a bipartisan centrist bloc in Congress.

 

Mr. Peltz is the father of Matthew H. Peltz, a director of the Company.

  

Qualifications:: Mr. Peltz has more than 40 years of business and investment experience, has served as the chairman and chief executive officer of public companies for over 20 years and, since 2005, has served as Chief Executive Officer of Trian Partners. Throughout his professional career, he has developed extensive experience working with management teams and boards of directors, as well as in acquiring, investing in and building companies and implementing operational improvements at the companies with which he has been involved. As a result, Mr. Peltz has strong operating experience and strategic planning skills, valuable leadership and corporate governance experience and strong relationships with institutional investors, investment banking/capital markets advisors and others that can be drawn upon for the Company’s benefit. Mr. Peltz has also been recognized by the National Association of Corporate Directors as among the most influential people in the global corporate governance arena. We believe that Mr. Peltz’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 73 75

 

Director Since:: 1993

 

Current Board Committees::

Corporate Social Responsibility (Chair)

Executive (Chair)

 

 

 

10        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        11


   

PETER W. MAY (VICE CHAIRMAN)

 
   

Mr. May has been a director of the Company since September 2008 when the Company commenced its current business, the ownership and franchising of the Wendy’s restaurant system. He served as a director of the Company’s predecessor companies from April 1993 anduntil September 2008, when Wendy’s International, Inc. merged with Triarc Companies, Inc. Mr. May has served as ournon-executive Vice Chairman since June 2007. He also served as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as a director or manager and an officer of certain of our subsidiaries from April 1993 through June 2007. Additionally, Mr. May has been President and a founding partnerFounding Partner of Trian Partners since November 2005. From January 1989 to April 1993, Mr. May was President and Chief Operating Officer of Trian Group, Limited Partnership. From 1983 to December 1988, he was President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of Triangle Industries, Inc.

 

Mr. May has served as a director of Mondelēz International, Inc. since March 2018. He previously served as a director of Tiffany & Co. sincefrom May 2008.2008 to May 2017.

 

Mr. May is actively involved with various civic organizations and serves as Chairman of the board of trustees of theThe Mount Sinai Medical CenterHealth System in New York, Vice Chairman of the New York Philharmonic, a trustee of both theNew-York Historical Society and The University of Chicago, a boardlife member of the advisory council of The University of Chicago the Advisory Council on the GraduateBooth School of Business, a director of the University of Chicago, Carnegie Hall and the Lincoln Center of the Performing Arts.Arts, a partner of the Partnership for New York City and a member of the executive council of No Labels.

  

Qualifications: Mr. May has more than 40 years of business and investment experience, has served as the president and chief operating officer of public companies for over 20 years and, since 2005, has served as President of Trian Partners. Throughout his professional career, he has developed extensive experience working with management teams and boards of directors, as well as in acquiring, investing in and building companies and implementing operational improvements at the companies with which he has been involved. Mr. May also brings to the Board financial sophistication by virtue of his prior professional experience as a certified public accountant. As a result, Mr. May has strong operating experience and strategic planning skills, valuable leadership and corporate governance experience and has strong relationships with institutional investors, investment banking/capital markets advisors and others that can be drawn upon for the Company’s benefit. We believe that Mr. May’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 73 75

 

Director Since:: 1993

 

Current Board Committees::

Capital and Investment (Chair)

Compensation

Corporate Social Responsibility

Executive

Technology (Chair)

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        11


   

EKMILRISTIN J. BA. DROLICKOLAN

 
   

Mr. BrolickMs. Dolan was elected as a director of the Company in July 2017. She is the founder and has been a director and the Chief Executive Officer of 605 LLC, an audience measurement and data analytics company in the media and entertainment industries, since its inception in November 2016. Prior to founding 605 LLC, Ms. Dolan worked at Cablevision Systems Corporation, a former large communications service provider sold in 2016, where she held several key leadership positions, including Chief Operating Officer from April 2014 to June 2016, President of Optimum Services from November 2011 to April 2014, Senior Executive Vice President of Product Management and Marketing from November 2011 to April 2013 and Senior Vice President from June 2003 to November 2011.

Ms. Dolan has also served as a director of AMC Networks Inc. since June 2011, The Madison Square Garden Company since September 2011. He2015, Revlon, Inc. since May 2017 and MSG Networks Inc. since April 2018. She previously served as our President and Chief Executive Officera director of Cablevision Systems Corporation from September 2011 to January 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Brolick was Chief Operating Officer of Yum! Brands, Inc. and President of two of Yum! Brands’ U.S. operating segments, Long John Silver’s and A&W All American Food Restaurants from June 2008 to September 2011. From December 2006May 2010 to June 2008, he was President of U.S. Brand Building for Yum! Brands. Prior to that, Mr. Brolick served as President and Chief Concept Officer of Taco Bell Corp., a position he held from July 2000 to November 2006. Before joining Taco Bell, Mr. Brolick worked at Wendy’s International for 12 years, last serving as Senior Vice President of New Product Marketing, Research and Strategic Planning.2016.

  

Qualifications:: In addition Ms. Dolan brings to serving as our Chief Executive Officer since September 2011, Mr. Brolick has extensive experience as an executiveBoard substantial expertise in thequick-service restaurant industry, including several yearstelevision audience data analytics, information integration and strategic marketing. Her breadth of senior management and leadership experience with Yum! Brands, Taco Bell and Wendy’s International. His depth of industry knowledge and insightexperience is a valuable resourceattributable to our Board. Much of Mr. Brolick’s business expertise relates to brand building, strategic planning,her extensive professional background in communications, marketing and operations allat Cablevision Systems Corporation, where she also held several key senior leadership positions. Ms. Dolan provides intimate and unique knowledge of television marketing campaigns, consumer data utilization, current and sophisticated data methodologies, predictive modeling and media expertise, each of which are important to the Company’s business. She also possesses significant executive management experience, which includes insight into corporate governance, working with management teams and boards of directors, finance, mergers & acquisitions, budgeting and strategic planning. We believe that Mr. Brolick’sMs. Dolan’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 68 52

 

Director Since:: 2011 2017

 

Current Board Committees::

Capital and Investment

ExecutiveTechnology

 

 

 

12        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement


   

JKANETENNETH HW. GILLILBERT

 
   

Ms. HillMr. Gilbert has been a director of the Company since September 2008. SheMay 2017. From October 2012 to December 2017, he served as the Group Chief Marketing Officer of VOSS of Norway ASA, a directorglobal manufacturer and marketer of Wendy’s Internationalpremium bottled water. Prior to joining VOSS, Mr. Gilbert founded and served as the President of RazorFocus, a marketing consultant practice, from 1994 until its mergerMay 2005 to October 2012. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of UniWorld Group, Inc., the longest established multicultural advertising agency in the U.S., from May 2003 to June 2004. From September 1995 to April 2001, Mr. Gilbert worked at Snapple Beverage Corporation (formerly Snapple Beverage Group, Inc.) as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, where he led marketing efforts to revitalize the brand and assembled four company brands for successful disposition. Prior to his employment with Snapple, Mr. Gilbert served as Group Account Director at the Company in September 2008. Ms. Hill is principalMessner Vetere Berger Carey Schmetterer RSCG advertising agency from July 1991 to August 1995 and as Senior Vice President and Director of Client Services at Hill Family Advisors, where she oversees her family’s assets and investments. SheUniWorld Group, Inc. from February 1989 to June 1991.

Mr. Gilbert also serves as an officer of Hill Ventures, Inc., which manages the assets, investments, public engagements and marketing relationships of her son, Grant Hill. From 1981 until her retirement in 2010, Ms. Hill was Vice President of Alexander & Associates, Inc.,Chairman for YourBevCo, LLC, a corporate consulting firm in Washington, D.C.beverage device company that she owned and managed, where she provided corporate planning, advice and analysisdevelops consumer devices that remove problematic ingredients from beverages known to directors, executives and managers in the areas of human resource planning, corporate responsibility, corporate communications and government consultation.

Ms. Hill has served as a director of Dean Foods Company since December 2001 and Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., the general partner of The Carlyle Group L.P., since May 2012. Ms. Hill previously served as a director of Sprint Nextel Corporation from 2005 to July 2013.

Ms. Hill is actively involved with various civic organizations and serves as a board member for Duke University, the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics and the Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts. She is also a member of the board of directors of two private companies, Echo360, Inc. and Esquire Bank.cause allergic or sensitivity reactions.

  

Qualifications:: Ms. Hill has been Mr. Gilbert possesses extensive experience in global brand management, marketing communications, advertising strategy and corporate social responsibility attributable to his overall professional background as a member of nine corporate boards duringsenior marketing executive in the past 25 years, which includes valuable service on compensation, corporate governanceconsumer beverage industry. In his former role as Chief Marketing Officer for VOSS, Mr. Gilbert oversaw the company’s marketing function, administered multi-million dollar budgets, directed internal marketing capabilities and audit committees. She brings to ourmanaged the company’s strategic worldwide brand development, expansion and distribution. His Board strong business administration and financial expertise, as well as extensivequalifications include hisin-depth knowledge and experienceexpertise in all areasinnovative brand revitalization, risk orientation, advertising conceptualization and public relations. Mr. Gilbert also provides valuable and unique insights into consumer brand positioning strategies, new product development, digital and social media platforms and cultivation of contemporary corporate governance. Ms. Hill assisted in the development of the Directors’ Education Institute at Duke Universitybrand recognition and has served as a presenter in numerousuniversity-sponsored programs for corporate directors. Through her corporate consulting firm, Ms. Hill advised hundreds of companies and senior executives in the areas of human resources and workforce inclusiveness, bothvalue, all of which are important to the Company’s business. We believe that Ms. Hill’sMr. Gilbert’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 68 67

 

Director Since:: 2008 2017

 

Current Board Committees::

CompensationCorporate Social Responsibility

Technology

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        13


   

DENNIS M. KASS

 
   

Mr. Kass was elected ashas been a director of the Company insince December 2015. From February 2013 to June 2014, Mr. Kass served as Vice Chairman and a Senior Advisor at Ridgeway Partners, an executive search firm. From 2003 to 2012, Mr. Kass served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Jennison Associates, LLC, an institutional asset manager. Prior to joining Jennison Associates, Mr. Kass spent 13 years with JPMorgan’s investment management unit, last serving as Vice Chairman and Chief Fiduciary Officer of JPMorgan Fleming Asset Management. Prior to that,Management, and he was also Vice President of the investment banking division at Goldman Sachs & Co. Also, Mr. Kass served in the Reagan Administration as the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Pension and Welfare Benefits under the Employee Benefits Security Administration from 1985 to 1987 and was a Special Assistant to the President for Policy Development from 1981 to 1982.

 

Mr. Kass has served as a director of Legg Mason, Inc. sincefrom April 2013 to July 2017 and was thenon-executive Chairman of Legg Mason from July 2013 to October 2014.

Mr. Kass also servesserved as an Advisory Partner of Trian Partners anduntil December 2017.

Mr. Kass serves as a member of the Lockheed Martin investment management company advisory board the investment advisory board of Cleveland Clinic Innovations and the advisory board for finance and the global executive board for the MIT Sloan School of Management. He previously served as a trustee and Vice Chairman of the Financial Accounting Foundation.Foundation and as a member of the investment advisory board of Cleveland Clinic Innovations.

  

Qualifications: Mr. Kass has significant knowledge and expertise in financial and asset management, accounting processes, corporate governance and public policy that is derived from his diverse professional and public service experiences. He also has notable experience with the implementation and oversight of investment product lines, retail and institutional distribution capabilities and overall business operations. Mr. Kass brings to our Board valuable leadership experience in working with management teams and boards of directors, as well as extensive knowledge and insight in finance, mergers and acquisitions, capital management, governance and regulatory matters relevant to public company audit, compensation and benefits committees. Mr. Kass has also acquired financial sophistication by virtue of his business experience and professional background, including his past service as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Fiduciary Officer of two different companies. We believe that Mr. Kass’ overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 65 67

 

Director Since:: 2015

 

Current Board Committees::

NoneAudit

Compensation

 

 

 

14        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        13


   

JOSEPH A. LEVATO

 
   

Mr. Levato has been a director of the Company since September 2008 when the Company commenced its current business, the ownership and franchising of the Wendy’s restaurant system. He served as a director of the Company’s predecessor companies from June 1996.1996 until September 2008, when Wendy’s International, Inc. merged with Triarc Companies, Inc. Mr. Levato also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and certain of our subsidiaries from April 1993 to August 1996, when he retired from the Company. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trian Group, Limited Partnership from January 1992 to April 1993. From 1984 to December 1988, Mr. Levato served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Triangle Industries, Inc.

  

Qualifications: Mr. Levato has significant knowledge of industrial, financial and consumer-related businesses that is derived from his professional experiences, including several years of senior management and leadership experience with the Company. Mr. Levato brings to our Board an intimate knowledge of governance and regulatory matters relevant to public company audit and compensation committees. Mr. Levato has acquired financial sophistication by virtue of his business experience and background, including his past service as Chief Financial Officer of three different companies, and the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Levato qualifies as an audit“audit committee financial expertexpert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. We believe that Mr. Levato’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 75 77

 

Director Since:: 1996

 

Current Board Committees::

Audit (Chair)

Benefits and Investment

Compensation

Executive

Nominating and Corporate Social ResponsibilityGovernance

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        15


   

MICHELLE “MICH” J. MATHEWS-SPRADLIN

 
   

Ms. Mathews-Spradlin has been a director of the Company since February 2015. From 1993 until her retirement in 2011, Ms. Mathews-Spradlin worked at Microsoft Corporation, where she served as Chief Marketing Officer and Senior Vice President, Central Marketing Group from 2005held several other key leadership positions prior to 2011, Corporate Vice President, Marketing from 2001 to 2005, Vice President, Corporate Public Relations from 1999 to 2001, and head of the Corporate Public Relations function from 1993 to 1999.that time. Prior to her employment with Microsoft, Ms. Mathews-Spradlin worked in the United Kingdom as a communications consultant for Microsoft from 1989 to 1993. Prior to that, she held various roles at General Motors Co. from 1986 to 1989.

 

Ms. Mathews-Spradlin also serves as a board member forof several private companies, including Bitium, Inc., OANDA Global Corporation, The Bouqs Company and You & Mr Jones,Jones. She is also a member of the board of trustees of the California Institute of Technology and is a member of the executive board of the UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television. Ms. Mathews-Spradlin also guest teaches at the University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, where she served as an M{2e} Executive-in-Residence in February 2015.

  

Qualifications: Ms. Mathews-Spradlin possesses extensive experience in global brand management and a deep understanding of the technology industry attributable to her background as a senior executive at Microsoft Corporation, one of the world’s largest technology companies. In her role as Chief Marketing Officer, she oversaw the company’s global marketing function, managed a multi-billion dollar marketing budget and an organization of several thousand people, and built demand for the company’s technology brands, including Windows, Office, Xbox, Bing and Internet Explorer. Ms. Mathews-Spradlin provides the Board with substantial and unique insights into digital media and marketing strategies, as well as anin-depth understanding of consumer-facing technology, all of which are important to the Company’s business. We believe that Ms. Mathews-Spradlin’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 49 51

 

Director Since:: 2015

 

Current Board Committees::

Compensation

Corporate Social Responsibility

Technology

 

 

 

1416        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement


   

MATTHEW H. PELTZ

 
   

Mr. Peltz was elected ashas been a director of the Company insince December 2015. HeMr. Peltz is a Senior Analyst and Partner and has been a member of the Investment Team of Trian Partners since January 2008. As a senior member of the Investment Team, he sources and generates new investment ideas, leads due diligence on potential investments and focuses on portfolio construction, risk management and corporate governance matters. Prior to joining Trian Partners, Mr. Peltz was with Goldman Sachs & Co. from May 2006 to January 2008, where he worked as an investment banking analyst and subsequently joined Liberty Harbor, an affiliated multi-strategy hedge fund.

 

Following the separation of the water and electrical businesses of Pentair plc into two independent publicly traded companies, which is targeted to occur on April 30, 2018, Mr. Peltz attends meetingswill become a member of the board of directors and the compensation committee of Pentair plc. Since September 2015, Mr. Peltz has attended meetings of the Pentair plc board of directors in anon-voting,non-participating observer capacity. Mr. Peltz previously served as a director of ARG Holding Corporation, the former parent company of the Arby’s® restaurant brand, from September 2012 to December 2015.

 

Mr. Peltz is the son of Nelson Peltz, thenon-executive Chairman and a director of the Company.

  

Qualifications: Mr. Peltz’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his breadth of knowledge and experience in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, capital allocation and operational improvements attributable to his professional background, including his service as a senior member of Trian Partners’ Investment Team.Team where he focuses on, among other things, environmental, social and governance issues across the Trian Partners portfolio. Mr. Peltz also provides our Board with valuable experience and unique insight into the quick-service restaurant industry from his recent service as a director of ARG Holding Corporation. We believe that Mr. Peltz’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 33 35

 

Director Since:: 2015

 

Current Board Committees::

NoneCapital and Investment

Corporate Social Responsibility

Technology

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        17


   

TODD A. PENEGOR

 
   

Mr. Penegor has been a director of the Company since May 2016. He joined the Company in June 2013 and has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2016. Prior to that, he served as our President and Chief Financial Officer sincefrom January 2016 to May 2016. HeMr. Penegor also served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and International from December 2014 to January 2016 and as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2013 to December 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Penegor worked at Kellogg Company, a global leader in food products, from 2000 to 2013 where he held several key leadership positions, including Vice President of Kellogg Company and President of U.S. Snacks from 2009 to June 2013, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kellogg Europe from 2007 to 2009 and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kellogg USA and Kellogg Snacks from 2002 to 2007. Prior to joining Kellogg, Mr. Penegor worked for 12 years at Ford Motor Company in various positions, including strategy, mergers and acquisitions, the controller’s office and treasury.

 

Mr. Penegor alsois actively involved with various civic organizations and serves as a trusteeVice Chair of the board of trustees of the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption.Adoption and as a member of the Michigan State University Eli Broad College of Business financial advisory board.

  

Qualifications: In addition to serving as our President and Chief FinancialExecutive Officer, Mr. Penegor has extensive experience as an executive in the food products and consumer goods industries, including several years of senior management and leadership experience with Kellogg Company and Ford Motor Company. Mr. Penegor provides the Board with significant expertise in matters of corporate finance, business administration, investor relations, financial reporting, strategic planning, brand building and domestic and international operations, all of which are important to the Company’s business. We believe that Mr. Penegor’s overall experience and knowledge will benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 50 52

 

Director Since:: N/A 2016

 

Current Board Committees:: N/A

Capital and Investment

Executive

 

 

18        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        15


   

PETER H. ROTHSCHILD

 
   

Mr. Rothschild has been a director of the Company since May 2010. He served as a director of Wendy’s International from March 2006 until its merger with the Company in September 2008. Mr. Rothschild has been the Managing Member of Daroth Capital LLC, a financial services company, since its founding in 2001 and the President and CEO of itswholly-owned subsidiary, Daroth Capital Advisors LLC, a securities broker-dealer, since 2002. Prior to founding Daroth Capital LLC, Mr. Rothschild was a Managing Director and Co-Headco-head of the Leveraged Finance and Industrial Finance groups at Wasserstein Perella, the predecessor company to Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein and its predecessor Wasserstein Perella, an investment bank, where he worked from 1996 to 2001. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. Rothschild was a Senior Managing Director and Headhead of the Natural Resources Group at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and one of the founders of the firm’s Leveraged Finance and Financial Buyer Coverage groups. From 1984 to 1990, he was a Managing Director and Head of the Industrial Group at Drexel Burnham Lambert.

 

Mr. Rothschild previously served as a director of Deerfield Capital Corp., predecessor to CIFC Corp., from December 2004 to April 2011 and as Interim Chairman of Deerfield Capital’s board of directors from April 2007 to April 2011.

 

Mr. Rothschild is also actively involved with various civic organizations and serves a member of The Mount Sinai Medical Center Samuel Bronfman Department of Medicine advisory board, the Tufts University School of Engineering board of advisors and the Tufts University Gordon Institute Entrepreneurial Leadership Program advisory board.

  

Qualifications: Mr. Rothschild has been employed as an investment banker since 1981. He has served on the board of directors of numerous companies, including Wendy’s International and Deerfield Capital, where he served as Interim Chairman. As a result of his professional background, Mr. Rothschild brings to our Board a deep understanding of corporate governance principles and extensive knowledge and experience in finance, mergers and acquisitions, capital management, corporate restructurings and the quick-service restaurant industry, all of which are important to the Company’s business. We believe that Mr. Rothschild’s overall experience and knowledge benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 60 62

 

Director Since:: 2010

 

Current Board Committees::

Audit

Compensation (Chair)

Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        19


   

ARTHUR B. WINKLEBLACK

 
   

Mr. Winkleblack has been a director of the Company since May 2016. Mr. Winkleblack provides financial, strategic planning and capital markets consulting services for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers, a global leader in asset management and disposition and the world’s largest industrial auctioneer, where he has served as Senior Advisor to the CEO since June 2014. He retired in June 2013 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of H. J. Heinz Company, a global packaged food manufacturer, where he had been employed since 2002. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Winkleblack worked at Indigo Capital as Acting Chief Operating Officer of Perform.com and Chief Executive Officer of Freeride.com. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of C. Dean Metropoulos Group from 1998 to 1999, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Six Flags Entertainment Corporation from 1996 to 1998 and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Commercial Avionics Systems, a division of AlliedSignal, Inc., from 1994 to 1996. Previously, he held various finance, strategy and business planning roles at PepsiCo, Inc. from 1982 to 1994.

 

Mr. Winkleblack has served as a director of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. since January 2008 and Performance Food Group Company since March 2015. He previously served as a director of RTI International Metals, Inc. from December 2013 tountil the company was acquired by Alcoa Corporation in July 2015.

  

Qualifications: Mr. Winkleblack has substantial experience as a senior executive and director across a broad range of industries, giving him knowledgeable perspectives on bothfinancial and strategic planning andfor domestic and international operations. Mr. Winkleblack’s 12 years of experience as Chief Financial Officer of a large, multinational consumer goods company enables him to bring valuable insight to the Board on a number of topics, including performance management, executive compensation, business analytics, risk management, IT, investor relations, internal controls, financial reporting, information technology and financial reporting.mergers & acquisitions. His executive experience with Heinz and PepsiCo, as well as his board experience with Performance Food Group, Company, provides a unique perspective on product supply dynamics for thequick-service restaurant industry. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Winkleblack qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. We believe that Mr. Winkleblack’s overall experience and knowledge will benefit and contribute to the collective qualifications, skills and experience of our Board of Directors.

 

Age:: 58 60

 

Director Since:: N/A 2016

 

Current Board Committees:: N/A

Audit (Chair)

Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

 

16        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Required VoteREQUIRED VOTE

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of a director nominee is required to elect such nominee as a director at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be included in the tabulation of voting results for this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR

THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE 11 DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

 

20        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        17


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Leadership StructureBOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board of Directors is currently led by Nelson Peltz, the Company’snon-executive Chairman, and Mr. May, the Company’snon-executive Vice Chairman. Mr. Brolick,Penegor, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, also serves as a member of the Board. Meetings of the Board of Directors are called to order and led by the Chairman or, in his absence, the Vice Chairman, or in the absence of both, the Chief Executive Officer. In the absence of the Chairman, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a majority of the directors present may elect any director present as chairman of the meeting.Non-management directors generally meet in executive session without management present after each regularregularly scheduled Board meeting.

The Board of Directors separated the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in June 2007 when Mr. Peltz, after serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the predecessor of the Company from 1993 to June 2007, became ournon-executive Chairman. The positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer have remained separate since that time, with Mr. Peltz currently serving as ournon-executive Chairman and Mr. BrolickPenegor currently serving as our Chief Executive Officer.

The Board believes that separating these two positions allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on developing and implementing the Company’s business strategies and objectives and supervising the Company’s day-to-day business operations, and allowsenables our Chairman to lead the Board of Directors in its oversight and advisory roles.roles and allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on supervising the Company’sday-to-day business operations and developing and implementing the Company’s business strategies and objectives. Because of the many responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the significant time and effort required by each of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer to perform their respective duties, the Board believes that having separate persons in these roles enhances the ability of each to discharge those duties effectively and, as a result, enhances the Company’s prospects for success. The Board also believes that having theseparate positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer separated provides a clear delineation of responsibilities for each position and fosters greater accountability of management.

The Board of Directors has carefully considered and approved its current leadership structure and believes that this structure is appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, who benefit from the combined leadership, judgment, knowledge and experience of our Chairman, Mr. Peltz, and our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Brolick.Penegor.

Board Membership CriteriaBOARD MEMBERSHIP CRITERIAAND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

The Board of Directors has adopted general Board membership criteria, which are set forth in the Company’sCorporate Governance Guidelines (the “Corporate Governance Guidelines”). The.The Board seeks members from diverse professional and personal backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for integrity. The Board’s assessment of potential director candidates includes an individual’s qualification as independent, as well as consideration of diversity, age, educational background, other board experience and commitments, business and professional achievements, and skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Company does not have a stated policy regarding the diversity of nominees or Board members; rather, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board view diversity (whether based on concepts such as gender, race and national origin, or broader principles such as differences in backgrounds, skills, experiences and viewpoints) as one of many elements to be considered when evaluating a particular candidate for Board membership.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations regarding possible director candidates from any source, including stockholders. Stockholders may recommend director candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by giving written notice of the recommendation to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in care of the Corporate Secretary of the Company at our corporate offices at the Company’s principal executive offices.address provided under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices.” The notice must: (i) include the candidate’s name, age, business address, residence address and principal occupation; (ii) describe the qualifications, attributes, skills or other qualities possessed by the candidate; and (iii) be accompanied by a written statement from the candidate consenting to serve as a director, if elected. Candidates who have been recommended by stockholders will be evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the same manner as other potential candidates. Stockholders who wish to formally nominate a candidate for election to the Board may do so provided they comply with the applicable eligibility, notice, content, stock ownership and other proceduresrequirements set forth in our Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws, which are described below under the caption “Other Matters—Stockholder Proposals for 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

 

18        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        21


Director IndependenceDIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Under the rules and listing standards of NASDAQ, the Board of Directors must have a majority of directors who meet the criteria for independence required by NASDAQ. Pursuant to the ourCorporate Governance Guidelines, the Board is required to determine whether each director satisfies the criteria for independence based on all relevant facts and circumstances. No director qualifies as independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that such director has no relationship which,that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with his or her exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

In accordance with theCorporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has adopted director independence categorical standardstheDirector Independence Categorical Standards (the “Independence Standards”Independence Standards) to assist the Board in determining the independence of the Company’s directors. Copies of theCorporate Governance Guidelines and theIndependence Standards are available on the Company’sour website atwww.aboutwendys.comwww.wendys.com/who-we-are. Pursuant to theIndependence Standards, the following relationships will preclude a director from qualifying as independent:

 

  

The director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an employee of the Company, or an immediate family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the Company;

 

 

  

The director or an immediate family member of the director accepted, during any12-month period within the past three years, more than $120,000 in direct or indirect compensation from the Company, other thanthan: (i) compensation for Board or Board committee service,service; (ii) compensation paid to an immediate family member who is anon-executive employee of the CompanyCompany; or (iii) benefits under atax-qualified retirement plan, ornon-discretionary compensation;

 

 

  

The director or an immediate family member of the director (i) is a current partner of the Company’s outside auditor or (ii) was a partner or employee of the Company’s outside auditor who worked on the Company’s audit at any time during the past three years;

 

 

  

The director or an immediate family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the Company’s executive officers served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

 

 

  

The director or an immediate family member of the director is a partner in, or a controlling shareholderstockholder or an executive officer of, any organization (including anon-profit organization, foundation or university) to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments for property or services in the current fiscal year or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed the greater of $200,000 or 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, other than (i) payments arising solely from investments in the Company’s securities and (ii) payments undernon-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs.

 

In applying these objective disqualifiers, the Board of Directors will take into account any commentary, interpretations or other guidance provided by NASDAQ with respect to NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605. Under theIndependence Standards, any relationships or transactions not described above will preclude a director from qualifying as independent only if:

 

  

The director has a “direct or indirect material interest” in such relationship or transaction within the meaning of Item 404(a) of SEC RegulationS-K and the material terms of the relationship or transaction are materially more favorable to the director than those that would be offered at the time and in comparable circumstances to unaffiliated persons; or

 

 

  

The Board of Directors, in exercising its judgment in light of all relevant facts and circumstances, determines that the relationship or transaction interferes with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

 

TheIndependence Standards provide that a relationship between the Company and an entity for which a director serves solely as anon-management director is not by itself material.

In February 2016, theThe Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors considered and reviewed certain transactions and relationships identified through responses to annual questionnaires completed by the Company’s directors, as well as other information presented by management related to transactions and relationships during the past three years between the Company, on the one hand, and the directors (including their immediate family members and business, charitable and other affiliates), on the other hand. As a result of this review, in February 2016,these reviews, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, affirmatively determined that Mses. Hill and Mathews-Spradlin and Messrs. Kass, Levato, Lewis, Rothschild and Schwab qualified as independent directors under applicable NASDAQ rules and theIndependence Standards.

Standards, each of Mses. Dolan and Mathews-Spradlin and Messrs. Gilbert, Kass, Levato, May, Rothschild and Winkleblack qualified as an independent director.

 

22        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        19


In March 2016, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors considered the independence of Mr. Winkleblack in connection with his nomination for election as a director of the Company at the Annual Meeting. After reviewing all relevant information, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, affirmatively determined that, if elected to the Board, Mr. Winkleblack will qualify as an independent director under applicable NASDAQ rules and the Independence Standards.

In making its independence determinations with respect to Ms.Mses. Dolan and Mathews-Spradlin and Messrs. Gilbert, Kass, Levato Lewis,and Rothschild, and Schwab, the Board noted that these directors did not have any transactions or relationships with the Company during the past three years. In making its independence determinationdeterminations with respect to Ms. Hill and Messrs. KassMay and Winkleblack, the Board of Directors considered the following transactions and relationships, each of which was deemed by the Board not to interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director:

 

  

Ms. Hill serves as a non-management director of Dean Foods Company, one of the leading food and beverage companies in the United States. Wendy’s and its franchisees, through independent third-party distributors, purchase products from Dean Foods Company and its subsidiaries;

Ms. Hill serves as a non-management director of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., the general partner of The Carlyle Group L.P., a global alternative asset manager. The Carlyle Group L.P. holds a 42% equity stake in Alamar Foods, a former Wendy’s master franchisee. In January 2015, Alamar Foods sold its 17 Wendy’s restaurants in the United Arab Emirates and ceased operating as a Wendy’s franchisee;

Ms. Hill served as a non-management director of Sprint Nextel Corporation, a leading communications services company, until July 2013. During 2013, the Company and its subsidiaries made payments to Sprint Nextel Corporation for telecommunications services;

Mr. Kass serves as an advisory partner of Trian Partners, a management company for various investment funds and accounts. As of March 28, 2016, Trian Partners beneficially owned 15.2% of our outstanding Common Stock. Nelson Peltz is Chief Executive Officer and a founding partner of Trian Partners, Peter W. May is the President and a founding partner of Trian Partners, and Matthew H. Peltzwhich, as noted above, is a Partnersignificant and memberlong-term stockholder of the Investment Team of Trian Partners. The Company isand party to that certain transactions and relationshipsagreement with Trian Partners, including thosethe Company described below under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions;Transactions.Mr. May also served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the predecessor of the Company from April 1993 through June 2007. The Board of Directors considered the relationship of Trian Partners and its partners with the Company and the presence of Trian Partners representatives (including Nelson Peltz) on the board of directors of Sysco Corporation, which is one of the Company’s suppliers.

 

 

  

Mr. Winkleblack serves as anon-management director of Performance Food Group Company, a leading marketer and distributor of food and food-related products across the United States. Wendy’sThe Company and its franchisees purchasepurchased food, beverages and supplies from Performance Food Group Company.

 

One of the Company’s former directors, Jack G. Wasserman,Janet Hill, served on the Board of Directors until June 2015May 2017 when hisher term expired at the Company’s 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders. In February 2015,2017, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, affirmatively determined that Mr. WassermanMs. Hill qualified as an independent director under applicable NASDAQ rules and theIndependence Standards.Standards.

Board Meetings and Attendance

The Board of Directors held six meetings during 2015. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by the Board committees on which he or she served (in each case, held during the period such director served). In accordance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the Company’s annual meetings of stockholders. All of the Company’s directors who were then serving on the Board attended the Company’s 2015 annual meeting of stockholders.

Board CommitteesBOARD COMMITTEESAND RELATED MATTERS

The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Performance Compensation Subcommittee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of the Charter of the Audit Committee, Joint Charter of the Compensation Committee and of the Performance Compensation Subcommittee and Charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on the Company’sour website atwww.aboutwendys.comwww.wendys.com/who-we-are and are available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests them. The Board also has a standing Benefits and Investment Committee, Capital and Investment Committee, Corporate Social Responsibility Committee, Executive Committee and ExecutiveTechnology Committee.

20        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


The current members of each Board committee are identified in the table below. It is anticipated that, at the Board’s organizational meeting immediately following the Annual Meeting, the Board will designate the directors to serve on each of its committees until the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders.

 

 NAME

AUDIT

COMPENSATION

NOMINATING

AND CORPORATE 

GOVERNANCE

 CAPITALAND 

INVESTMENT

CORPORATE

SOCIAL
 RESPONSIBILITY 

 EXECUTIVE 

TECHNOLOGY

Nelson Peltz

Chair

Chair

Peter W. May*

Chair

Chair

Emil J. Brolick

NAME

Kristin A. Dolan*

AUDIT

COMPENSATION

NOMINATING

AND CORPORATE

GOVERNANCE

BENEFITSAND

INVESTMENT

CAPITALAND

INVESTMENT

CORPORATE SOCIAL

RESPONSIBILITY

EXECUTIVE

Kenneth W. Gilbert*

Dennis M. Kass*

 (1)

Nelson

Joseph A. Levato*

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin*

 (1)

Matthew H. Peltz

 

Chair

 

Chair

 

Todd A. Penegor

Peter H. Rothschild*

Chair (1)

Chair

Peter W. May

Arthur B. Winkleblack*

 

Chair

 

ü

 

ü

Emil J. Brolick

 

 *ü

ü

Janet Hill*

ü  (1)

Dennis M. Kass*

Joseph A. Levato*

Chair (2)

ü

ü

ü

J. Randolph Lewis* (3)

ü

ü

Chair

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin*

ü  (1)

Matthew H. Peltz

Peter H. Rothschild*

ü

ü

David E. Schwab II* (3)

ü

Chair (1)

Chair

ü

Independent Director.

 

*

Independent Director

(1)

Also serves as a member of the Performance Compensation Subcommittee.

 

(2)

Audit Committee Financial Expert.

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        23

(3)

Not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.


ATTENDANCEAT BOARDAND COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ANNUAL MEETING

The Board of Directors held nine meetings during 2017. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by the Board committees on which he or she served (in each case, held during the period such director served). In accordance with theCorporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the Company’s annual meetings of stockholders. Each of the Company’s directors who were then serving on the Board attended the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 Committee Members:

AUDIT COMMITTEECommittee Functions:

 Arthur B. Winkleblack* (Chair) 

 Dennis M. Kass

 Joseph A. Levato*

 Peter H. Rothschild

  *Audit Committee Financial Expert  

 Number of

Number of Meetings in 2017:5

As more fully described in 2015:  11

Committee Functions:  The Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s financial statements, and assists the Board in fulfilling its charter, the Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling the Board’s oversight responsibility relating to:

 

The integrity of the Company’s financial statements and financial reporting process, the Company’s systems of internal accounting and financial controls and other financial information provided by the Company;

 

The performance of the Company’s internal audit function;

 

The annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements, the engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;

 

The Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures; and

 

Discussing risk assessment and risk management policies, particularly those involving major financial risk exposures.

Independence and Financial Literacy:.  The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the independence and financial literacy requirements of NASDAQ and the independence requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board has also determined that at least one membertwo members of the Audit Committee, Mr.Messrs. Levato qualifiesand Winkleblack, each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” under applicable SEC rules and regulations and as a “financially sophisticated” audit committee member under applicable NASDAQ rules.

Audit Committee Report:.  The report of the Audit Committee with respect to 20152017 is provided below under the caption “Audit Committee Report.”

 

24        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION COMMITTEEAND PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION SUBCOMMITTEE

 Committee Members:

Committee Functions:

 Peter H. Rothschild* (Chair)

 Dennis M. Kass*

 Joseph A. Levato

 Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin* 

 Peter W. May

  *Subcommittee Member

 Number of

 Meetings in 2017:

 4 joint meetings

As more fully described in its charter, the primary purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s directors and executive officers, including administering any salary, compensation and incentive plans that the Committee is designated by the Board to administer. In carrying out its duties, the Compensation Committee:

•    Reviews and approves the goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and determines (or recommends to the Board for determination) the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer based on such evaluation;

•    Reviews and approves the compensation of our other executive officers, oversees an evaluation of the compensation program’s effectiveness for such officers and determines the compensation of such officers upon considering any other relevant matters, including any recommendations made by the Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee’s independent outside compensation consultant;

•    Reviews and approves the overall compensation philosophy, policies and procedures for the Company’s executive officers, including the use of employment agreements, severance plans and arrangements, deferred compensation plans and other executive benefits and perquisites;

•    Reviews and advises the Board with respect to executive officer incentive programs, compensation plans and equity-based plans, and administers such plans as the Board designates, which includes the determination of awards to be granted to executive officers and other employees under such plans and evaluation of achievements of established plan goals and objectives;

•    Reviews the competitiveness and appropriateness of ournon-employee director compensation program and approves (or makes recommendations to the Board) with respect tonon-employee director compensation and perquisites;

•    Reviews and discusses the Compensation Discussion and Analysis prepared by management and determines whether to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s proxy statement and annual report;

•    Reviews and evaluates with management whether the Company’s compensation policies and practices for executive officers and other employees create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company and reviews any related disclosure required by SEC rules and regulations to be included in the Company’s proxy statement;

•    Provides recommendations to the Board on compensation-related proposals to be considered at stockholder meetings (includingsay-on-pay andsay-on-frequency advisory votes), reviews the results of any stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation matters and considers whether to implement (or recommend to the Board the implementation of) any modifications to the Company’s compensation programs and policies in response to such voting results;

•    Performs certain settlor functions with respect to the Company’s 401(k) plan and other pension, profit sharing, thrift or other retirement plans and ERISA welfare benefit plans (collectively, the “ERISA Plans”);

•    Reviews, approves and adopts any new retirement plan, or any amendment to the Company’s 401(k) plan or other retirement plan, that would result in a material cost increase or material change in benefit levels, subject to applicable plan documents;

•    Appoints, monitors and removes (if necessary), members of the Investment Review Committee and Benefits Administrative Committee (two committees composed of Company employees responsible for oversight of our ERISA Plans), which includes conducting annual reviews of such committee and modifying such committees’ responsibilities as the Compensation Committee considers appropriate (such as the delegation of specific compliance monitoring, plan review or other ERISA plan-related responsibilities); and

•    Conducts an annual review of each ERISA Plan’s operations (except as otherwise specified in the applicable plan documents).

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        2125


COMPENSATION COMMITTEEAND PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION SUBCOMMITTEE

Number of Meetings in 2015Performance Compensation Subcommittee:.  6 joint meetings

Committee Functions:  The Compensation Committee assists the Board in discharging its responsibility relating to compensation of the Company’s directors and executive officers, including administering any salary, compensation and incentive plans that the Committee is designated by the Board to administer.

The Performance Compensation Subcommittee (the “Subcommittee”) was also established by the Board in 1997 to administer the Company’s compensation plans that are intended to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), including the Company’s 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, (asas amended the(the “2010 Omnibus Award Plan”), and any other salary, compensation and incentive plans that the Subcommittee is designated by the Board to administer.

The processes and procedures employed by the Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee in considering and determining executive and director compensation are described below under the caption “Compensation Committee—Responsibilities and Governance.

Independence:.The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee satisfies the independence requirements of NASDAQ. In addition, each member of the Subcommittee is an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and a “non-employee“non-employee director” for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Compensation Committee Report:.  The report of the Compensation Committee with respect to 20152017 is provided below under the caption “Compensation Committee Report.”

Additional information about the actions taken by the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee in 2017 with respect to the executive compensation of our NEOs is discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and under the caption “Compensation Committee Report.” The actions taken by the Compensation Committee in 2017 regarding the compensation of ournon-employee directors are discussed under the caption “Compensation of Directors.”

Authority to Delegate

The Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee each may delegate authority to subcommittees composed of one or more of its members, and also may delegate authority to its Chair when it deems appropriate, subject to the terms of its charter. The Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee also may delegate to one or more directors or officers the authority to make grants of equity-based compensation to eligible employees who are not executive officers, subject to the terms of the Company’s compensation plans and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Any director or officer to whom the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee grants such authority must regularly report any grants so made, and the Committee or the Subcommittee may revoke any delegation of authority at any time.

Role of Compensation Consultants in the Executive Compensation Process

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews and evaluates the components and competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program, using information drawn from a variety of sources, including information provided by outside compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors, as well as the Committee’s own experience in recruiting, retaining and compensating executives. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and oversee the work of outside compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors in connection with discharging its responsibilities, including the sole authority to determine such consultants’ or advisors’ fees and other retention terms. The Company provides such funding as the Compensation Committee determines to be necessary or appropriate for payment of compensation to consultants and advisors retained by the Committee.

Since December 2009, the Compensation Committee has engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) to serve as its independent outside compensation consultant. Representatives from FW Cook regularly attend Compensation Committee meetings and provide advice to the Committee on a variety of compensation-related matters. The Compensation Committee seeks input from FW Cook on competitive market practices, including evolving trends and best practices. During 2017, FW Cook assisted the Compensation Committee with respect to the design of the Company’s executive compensation program and determination of targeted compensation levels thereunder, including base salary levels, the 2017 annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive awards, and the overall mix of total direct compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives. FW Cook also advised the Compensation Committee in connection with its review and approval of compensation packages offered to executives, as well as the design of and modifications to the executive compensation program for 2018. At the request of the Compensation Committee, FW Cook periodically reviews the compensation components and levels of the Company’s executive officers and advises the Committee on the appropriateness of the Company’s executive compensation program in the context of its overall compensation philosophy. Under the terms of its engagement, FW Cook does not provide any other services to the Company and works with management only on matters for which the Compensation Committee has oversight responsibility. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules (including consideration of the six independence factors specified in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(d)(3)(D)) and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent FW Cook from serving as an independent compensation consultant to the Committee.

26        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


Management provides information and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee from time to time regarding the design of the Company’s executive compensation program. In formulating its recommendations, management reviews information from a variety of sources, including information provided by outside compensation consultants. During 2017, management engaged Willis Towers Watson to serve as management’s outside compensation consultant. Willis Towers Watson provided market data and other information to management in connection with the design of the Company’s executive compensation program, including a review of base salary, total cash compensation and total direct compensation levels for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives. Willis Towers Watson also advised management on potential voting recommendations by proxy advisory firms with respect to the Company’s executive compensation program. Certain of the market data and other information provided by Willis Towers Watson was also made available to the Compensation Committee and its independent outside compensation consultant, FW Cook.

Management’s Role in the Executive Compensation Process

The Company’s executive officers provide support and assistance to the Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee on a variety of compensation-related matters. Each year, the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives provide input to the Subcommittee regarding the design of the Company’s annual cash incentive plan and annual long-term equity incentive plan, including proposed performance goals and objectives and a list of participants eligible to receive awards. The Subcommittee then determines the structure and components of the annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive awards after considering management’s recommendations, as well as input from the Subcommittee’s independent outside compensation consultant. With respect to performance-based awards, following the completion of each performance period, the Chief Financial Officer provides the Subcommittee with a certification of the Company’s actual performance relative to the stated performance goals and the resulting payouts to participants based on such performance. Under the terms of the annual cash incentive plan, payouts to executives other than the Chief Executive Officer can be adjusted by the Subcommittee by up to+/-25% (subject to the maximum incentive award opportunities established by the Subcommittee for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code) at the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, based on his assessment of each executive’s individual performance. The Subcommittee then determines the actual incentive payouts to eligible participants after taking into account Company and individual performance and any other relevant facts and circumstances.

The Chief Executive Officer and other executives with expertise in compensation, benefits, tax, accounting and legal matters provide information and make recommendations to the Compensation Committee from time to time on compensation-related matters, including proposed employment, retention, relocation, severance and other compensatory arrangements, base salary levels, annual cash incentive plans, long-term equity incentive awards, annual compensation risk assessments and evolving trends and best practices in executive compensation. Executives also present information to the Compensation Committee regarding the Company’s business and financial performance, strategic initiatives, legal and regulatory developments and other relevant matters. In accordance with applicable NASDAQ rules, the Chief Executive Officer may not be present during any voting or deliberations by the Compensation Committee or Subcommittee with respect to his compensation.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Sixnon-management directors served on the Compensation Committee during 2017: Ms. Hill (until her retirement from the Board in May 2017), Ms. Mathews-Spradlin and Messrs. Kass, Levato, May (upon his appointment to the Compensation Committee in May 2017) and Rothschild.

During 2017: (i) no member of the Compensation Committee had ever served as an officer or employee of the Company, except that Mr. Levato served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 1993 to August 1996 and Mr. May served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the predecessor of the Company from April 1993 to June 2007; (ii) no member of the Compensation Committee was party to any related person transaction or other relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of SEC RegulationS-K, except that, as previously noted above, Mr. May is the President and a founding partner and Principal of Trian Partners, which is a significant and long-term stockholder of the Company and party to that certain agreement with the Company described under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions;” and (iii) none of the Company’s executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee, or a similar committee, of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee.

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        27


NOMINATINGAND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

 

 Committee Members:     

NOMINATINGAND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEECommittee Functions:

Number of Meetings in 2015:  7

Committee Functions:  The Peter H. Rothschild (Chair)     

 Joseph A. Levato     

 Arthur B. Winkleblack     

 Number of      

 Meetings in 2017:12

As more fully described in its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board by:

 

Identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with any approved guidelines and criteria approved by the Board;

 

Considering and recommending director nominees for the Board to select in connection with each annual meeting of stockholders;

 

Considering and recommending nominees for election to fill any vacancies on the Board and to address related matters;

 

    Recommending to the Board the committee assignments of directors;

•    Developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance principles applicable to the Company; and

 

Overseeing an annual evaluation of the Board’s performance.

Independence:.  The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee satisfies the independence requirements of NASDAQ.

OTHER BOARD COMMITTEES

Benefits and Investment Committee.  The Benefits and Investment Committee (formerly known as the ERISA Committee) is the plan administrator of the Company’s 401(k) plan, and has general oversight responsibility with respect to the operation of the Company’s pension, profit sharing, thrift or other retirement plans and ERISA welfare benefit plans.

Capital and Investment Committee.The Capital and Investment Committee is responsible for approving the investment of the Company’s excess funds (i.e., funds not currently required for operations or acquisitions) and exercising approval authority for certain transactions (such as capital expenditures, acquisitions, dispositions and borrowings) within amounts specified by the Board.

Corporate Social Responsibility Committee.The Corporate Social Responsibility Committee meets at least once annually and oversees and reviews the Company’s various social responsibility initiatives, as well as related risks and opportunities. The Corporate Social Responsibility Committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving the Company’s charitable contributions (subject to review and approval by the Audit Committee of any proposed charitable contribution that would constitute a related person transaction) and recommending to the Board any changes to the maximum amount of charitable contributions that may be made by the Company in any fiscal year.

22        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Executive Committee.During intervals between meetings of the Board, the Executive Committee may exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the Company, including, without limitation, all such powers and authority as may be permitted under Section 141(c)(2) of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Executive Sessions ofTechnology Committee.In November 2017, the Board established the Technology Committee to assist the Board in discharging the Board’s oversight responsibilities relating to information technology and cybersecurity matters involving the Company’s digital customer engagement initiatives, including restaurantpoint-of-sale systems, digital ordering tools (such as kiosks, online ordering capabilities and mobile ordering applications) and digital and mobile customer loyalty programs. To the extent practicable, the Technology Committee will also review with management any supply chain-related technology matters.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONSOFTHE BOARD

The Board of Directors holds regularly scheduled executive sessions in whichnon-management directors meet without any members of management present. The Chairman or, in his absence, the Vice Chairman, presides over these executive sessions. The Board also meets at least twice a year in executive session with only independent directors present. The ChairmanAnnually, the Chair of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee rotate presiding over these executive sessions, with Mr. SchwabRothschild presiding in 2015.2017.

Board’s Role in Risk OversightBOARDS ROLEIN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board of Directors provides oversight with respect to the Company’s risk assessment and risk management activities, which are designed to identify, prioritize, assess, monitor and mitigate material risks to the Company, including financial, operational, compliance and strategic risks. While the Board has primary responsibility for risk

28        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


oversight, the Board’s standing committees support the Board by regularly addressing various risks in their respective areas of responsibility. The Audit Committee focuses on financial risks, including reviewing with management, the Company’s internal auditors and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the Company’s major risk exposures (with particular emphasis on financial risk exposures), the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s accounting and financial controls and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. The Compensation Committee considers risks presented by the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its executive officers and other employees, as discussed below under the caption “Compensation Risk Assessment.” The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews risks related to the Company’s corporate governance structure and processes, including director qualifications and independence, stockholder proposals related to governance, succession planning and the effectiveness of ourCorporate Governance Guidelines. TheGuidelines.The Board’s risk oversight function is also supported by a Risk Oversight Committee composed of members of senior management. The Risk Oversight Committee is exclusively devoted to prioritizing and assessing all categories of enterprise risk, including risks delegated by the Board of Directors to the Board committees, as well as other operational, compliance and strategic risks facing the Company. Each of these committees reports directly to the Board.

The Board believes that its current leadership structure supports the risk oversight function of the Board. Having the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board filled by separate individuals allows the Chief Executive Officer to lead senior management in its supervision of the Company’sday-to-day business operations, including the identification, assessment and mitigation of material risks, and allows the Chairman to lead the Board in its oversight of the Company’s risk assessment and risk management activities.

Compensation Risk AssessmentCOMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT

As part of the Board’s risk oversight function, the Compensation Committee conducts an annual review ofcompensation-related risk. In February 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee and its independent advisors met with management to review management’s conclusion that the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Management reviewed with the Compensation Committee the various factors underlying management’s conclusion, including the performance objectives and target levels used in connection with the Company’s incentive awards, as well as the features of the Company’s compensation plans that are designed to mitigate compensation-related risk, including the following:

 

  

Plan and award metrics are tied directly to overall profitability;

 

 

  

Various methods for delivering compensation are utilized, including cash-based and equity-based incentives with different time horizons that provide a balanced mix of both short-term and long-term incentives;

 

 

  

Performance-based awards have fixed maximum payouts;

 

 

  

The Company has the right to reduce or eliminate payouts under incentive awards through the use of negative discretion, including if a participant’s behavior is in conflict with the Company’sCode of Business Conduct and Ethics or any other Company policy or procedure;

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        23


  

Annual incentive payouts are not made until the Company’s financial statements are audited by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and plan results are certified by the Chief Financial Officer; and

 

 

  

All incentive awards granted under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan contain “clawback”clawback provisions in favor of the Company in the event the Company is required to materially restate its financial statements or a court determines that a participant has engaged in a “detrimental activity” (as defined in the plan)2010 Omnibus Award Plan).

 

With respect to the Company’s compensation program for executive officers, the Compensation Committee believesconcluded that this program is appropriately designed to support the Company’s business objectives by linking executive compensation to individual performance, the Company’s attainment of annual and multi-year operating and financial goals and the creation of long-term stockholder value. The executive compensation program includes the following features whichthat are designed to prevent risk-taking that could have a material adverse effect on the Company:

 

  

Base salaries represent a sufficient component of executives’ total cash compensation so that excessive risk-taking that maymight be associated with performance-based compensation is mitigated;

 

 

  

Performance goals and metrics under the Company’s annual cash incentive plan are based upon realistic operating levels that can be attained without taking inappropriate risks or deviating from normal operations or approved strategies;

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        29


  

Long-term equity incentive awards are based in part upon the Company’s performance over a multi-year period, which mitigates against the taking of short-term risk;

 

 

  

Incentive compensation plan design allows for adjustment of performance metrics for non-recurringnonrecurring and other special items so that executives are rewarded based on the Company’s actual operating results;

 

 

  

Equity-based awards represent a significant portion of executives’ total compensation, which links executive compensation to the long-term value of our Common Stock; and

 

 

  

The Board of Directors has adopted theStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executive Officers and Directors that require significant stock ownership by executives, which further aligns the interests of executives with the interests of stockholders.

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Related Governance PoliciesCODEOF BUSINESS CONDUCTAND ETHICSAND RELATED GOVERNANCE POLICIES

The Board of Directors has adopted several governance policies to support its risk oversight function, including a ourCode of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “CodeCode of Ethics”Ethics), a Securities Trading Policy and a Public Disclosure Policy.Policy.

Code of Ethics.TheCode of Ethics is designed to ensure that the Company’s business is conducted with integrity. TheCode of Ethics sets forth the Company’s standards and expectations regarding business relationships, franchisee relations, compliance with law, business conduct, conflicts of interest, use of Company assets, confidential information and recording and reporting information. The OurCode of Ethics applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of theCode of Ethics is available on the Company’sour website atwww.aboutwendys.comwww.wendys.com/who-we-are. Any amendments to or waivers from theCode of Ethics that are required to be disclosed by applicable SEC rules will also be posted on the Company’s website.

Securities Trading Policy.TheSecurities Trading Policy is intended to assist the Company and its directors, officers and employees in complying with federal and state securities laws and avoiding even the appearance of questionable or improper conduct in connection with securities transactions. Under the ourSecurities Trading Policy, covered persons:

 

  

May not trade in Company securities if they are aware of material nonpublic information;

 

 

  

May not trade in the securities of another company if they are aware of material nonpublic information about that company which was obtained during the course of their employment with the Company;

 

 

  

May not speculate in Company securities through engaging in puts, calls or short positions;

 

 

  

May not engage in any other hedging transactions withoutpre-clearance from the Company’s legal department;

 

 

  

May not share material nonpublic information with others or recommend to anyone the purchase or sale of any securities when they are aware of material, undisclosed information; and

 

 

  

Must comply with certainpre-clearance and blackout procedures described in the policy.

 

24        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Public Disclosure Policy.ThePublic Disclosure Policy is intended to support the Company’s commitment to providing timely, transparent, consistent and credible information to the investing public, consistent with legal and regulatory requirements, including the SEC’s Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure). Regulation FD prohibits the Company or persons acting on its behalf from disclosing material nonpublic information to securities market professionals or stockholders before disclosing the information to the general public. ThePublic Disclosure Policy covers all directors, officers and employees of the Company and sets forth certain procedures and requirements that are applicable to:

 

  

Disclosures in documents filed with the SEC;

 

 

  

Statements made in annual, quarterly and current reports, press releases, communications with analysts, investors and the media, speeches and presentations; and

 

 

  

Information contained on the Company’s website.

 

Board’s Role in Succession PlanningBOARDS ROLEIN SUCCESSION PLANNING

As reflected in ourCorporate Governance Guidelines, one of the key responsibilities of the Board of Directors is planning for Chief Executive Officer succession. Succession planning addresses both contingency planning for emergencies (such as death or disability) and succession in the ordinary course of business (such as retirement). The Board’s goal is to ensure senior leadership continuity by overseeing the development of executive talent and planning for the efficient succession of the Chief Executive Officer. The Board has delegated oversight responsibility for succession planning to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which periodically reviews succession plans and makes recommendations to the Board in the event of an emergency or the retirement of the Chief Executive Officer.

30        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


The Board of Directors, with input from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, conducts a periodic review of senior leadership succession plans. During this review, the Board discusses with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief People Officer organizational needs, competitive challenges, candidates for senior leadership positions, succession timing for those positions and development plans for high-potential candidates.

During 2015, the Board of Directors was actively engaged in succession planning. In October 2015, the Company announced that Mr. Brolick planned to retire from management duties with the Company in May 2016. As part of the succession plan approved by the Board, Mr. Penegor was appointed President of the Company effective January 4, 2016, and Mr. Penegor is expected to succeed Mr. Brolick in the Chief Executive Officer role after a transition period that began in the first quarter of 2016. Mr. Brolick is expected to continue to serve on the Board of Directors upon his retirement to ensure continuity of leadership and strategic focus for the Company.

Board and Committee EvaluationsBOARDAND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS

Pursuant to ourCorporate Governance Guidelines, the Board of Directors and its committees conduct annualself-evaluations under the direction of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The evaluations are intended to provide the Board and its committees with an opportunity to evaluate their performance for the purpose of improving Board and committee processes and effectiveness. As part of the Board’s self-evaluation, directors consider and provide feedback on a range of issues, including interactions with and information flow from management, nature and scope of agenda items, adequacy and efficiency of meetings, Board structure and composition, committee composition and responsibilities, processes to ensure open communication and timely action, the effectiveness of executive sessions and consideration of stockholder value and interests. Committee self-evaluations are led by the committee chairs and include, among other topics, a review of the roleroles and responsibilities set forth in the committee charters, interactions with and information flow from management, nature and scope of agenda items, adequacy and efficiency of meetings, committee structure and composition, committee resources and the role of outside consultants and advisers.advisors. The results of the committee self-evaluations are discussed with the full Board.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        2531


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE—RESPONSIBILITIES AND GOVERNANCE

Scope of Authority and Responsibilities

The primary purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in discharging its responsibility relating to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers and directors. In carrying out its duties, the Compensation Committee:

Reviews and approves the goals and objectives relevant to compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of those goals and objectives and determines, or recommends to the Board for determination, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer based on such evaluation;

Reviews and approves the goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Company’s other executive officers, oversees an evaluation of the effectiveness of the compensation program for such officers and determines the compensation of such officers taking into consideration any matters it deems relevant, including any recommendations made by the Chief Executive Officer and the Committee’s independent outside compensation consultant;

Reviews and approves the overall compensation philosophy, policies and practices for the Company’s executive officers, including the use of employment agreements, severance plans and arrangements, deferred compensation plans and other executive benefits and perquisites;

Reviews and advises the Board with respect to executive officer incentive programs, compensation plans and equity-based plans, and administers such plans as the Board designates, including determining awards to be granted to executive officers and other employees under such plans and evaluating the achievement of goals and objectives established under such plans;

Reviews the competitiveness and appropriateness of the compensation program for the Company’snon-management directors, and approves or makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to director compensation;

Reviews and discusses the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” prepared by management and determines whether to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s proxy statement and annual report;

Reviews and evaluates with management whether the Company’s compensation policies and practices for executive officers and other employees create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, and reviews any related disclosure required by SEC rules and regulations to be included in the Company’s proxy statement; and

Provides recommendations to the Board on compensation-related proposals to be considered at stockholder meetings, including “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency” advisory votes, reviews the results of any stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation matters and considers whether to implement, or recommend to the Board the implementation of, any modifications to the Company’s compensation programs and policies in response to such voting results.

Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors

The actions taken by the Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee during 2015 with respect to the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers are discussed below under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The actions taken by the Compensation Committee during 2015 with respect to the compensation of the Company’s non-management directors are discussed below under the caption “Compensation of Directors.”

Authority to Delegate

The Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee each may delegate authority to subcommittees composed of one or more of its members, and also may delegate authority to its Chairman when it deems appropriate, subject to the terms of its charter. The Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee also may delegate to one or more directors or officers the authority to make grants of equity-based compensation to eligible employees who are not executive officers, subject to the terms of the Company’s compensation plans and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Any director or officer to whom the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee grants such authority must regularly report any grants so made, and the Committee or the Subcommittee may revoke any delegation of authority at any time.

26        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Role of Compensation Consultants and Other Advisers

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews and evaluates the components and competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program, using information drawn from a variety of sources, including information provided by outside compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisers, as well as the Committee’s own experience in recruiting, retaining and compensating executives. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and oversee the work of outside compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisers in connection with discharging its responsibilities, including the sole authority to determine such consultants’ or advisers’ fees and other retention terms. The Company provides such funding as the Compensation Committee determines to be necessary or appropriate for payment of compensation to consultants and advisers retained by the Committee.

Since December 2009, the Compensation Committee has engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook & Co.”) to serve as its independent outside compensation consultant. Representatives from Cook & Co. regularly attend Compensation Committee meetings and provide advice to the Committee on a variety of compensation-related matters. The Compensation Committee seeks input from Cook & Co. on competitive market practices, including evolving trends and best practices and external survey data. During 2015, Cook & Co. assisted the Compensation Committee with respect to the design of the Company’s executive compensation program, including base salary levels, the 2015 cash incentive plan and the 2015 long-term equity incentive awards for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives. Cook & Co. also advised the Compensation Committee in connection with its review and approval of compensation packages offered to new executives hired by the Company, one-time equity incentive awards granted to certain key executives, compensation decisions related to the transition of the President and Chief Executive Officer roles and enhancements to the executive compensation program for 2016. At the request of the Compensation Committee, Cook & Co. periodically reviews the compensation components and levels of the Company’s executive officers and advises the Committee on the appropriateness of the Company’s executive compensation program in the context of its overall compensation philosophy. Under the terms of its engagement, Cook & Co. does not provide any other services to the Company and works with management only on matters for which the Compensation Committee has oversight responsibility. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Cook & Co. pursuant to applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules (including consideration of the six independence factors specified in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(d)(3)(D)) and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Cook & Co. from serving as an independent compensation consultant to the Committee.

Management provides information and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee from time to time regarding the design of the Company’s executive compensation program. In formulating its recommendations, management reviews information from a variety of sources, including information provided by outside compensation consultants. During 2015, management engaged Willis Towers Watson to serve as management’s outside compensation consultant. Willis Towers Watson provided market data and other information to management in connection with the design of the Company’s executive compensation program, including a review of base salary, total cash compensation and total direct compensation levels for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives. Willis Towers Watson also advised management on potential voting recommendations by proxy advisory firms with respect to the Company’s executive compensation program and amendments to the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan. Certain of the market data and other information provided by Towers Willis Watson was also made available to the Compensation Committee and its independent outside compensation consultant, Cook & Co.

Role of Executive Officers

The Company’s executive officers provide support and assistance to the Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee on a variety of compensation-related matters. Each year, the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives provide input to the Subcommittee regarding the design of the Company’s annual cash incentive plan and annual long-term equity incentive plan, including proposed performance goals and objectives and a list of participants eligible to receive awards. The Subcommittee then determines the structure and components of the annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive awards after considering management’s recommendations, as well as input from the Subcommittee’s independent outside compensation consultant. With respect to performance-based awards, following the completion of each performance period, the Chief Financial Officer provides the Subcommittee with a certification of the Company’s actual performance relative to the stated performance goals and the resulting payouts to participants based on such performance. Under the terms of the annual cash incentive plan, payouts to executives other than the Chief Executive Officer can be adjusted by the Subcommittee by up to +/-25% (subject to the maximum incentive award opportunities established by the Subcommittee for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code) at the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, based on his assessment of each executive’s individual performance. The Subcommittee then determines the actual incentive payouts to eligible participants after taking into account Company and individual performance and any other relevant facts and circumstances.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        27


The Chief Executive Officer and other executives with expertise in compensation, benefits, tax, accounting and legal matters provide information and make recommendations to the Compensation Committee from time to time on compensation-related matters, including proposed employment, retention, relocation, severance and other compensatory arrangements, base salary levels, annual cash incentive plans, long-term equity incentive awards, annual compensation risk assessments and evolving trends and best practices in executive compensation. Executives also present information to the Compensation Committee regarding the Company’s business and financial performance, strategic initiatives, legal and regulatory developments and other relevant matters. In accordance with applicable NASDAQ rules, the Chief Executive Officer may not be present during any voting or deliberations by the Compensation Committee or Subcommittee with respect to his compensation.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Five non-management directors served on the Compensation Committee during 2015: Mr. Schwab (Chair), Ms. Hill, Mr. Levato, Ms. Mathews-Spradlin (upon her appointment to the Committee on June 1, 2015) and Mr. Wasserman (until his retirement from the Board on June 1, 2015).

During 2015: (i) no member of the Compensation Committee had ever served as an officer or employee of the Company, except that, from 1993 to 1996, Mr. Levato served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; (ii) no member of the Compensation Committee was party to any related person transaction or other relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K; and (iii) none of the Company’s executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee, or a similar committee, of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee.

28        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT*

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company’s management and, based on such review and discussions, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.December 31, 2017.

The Compensation Committee:

David E. Schwab II,Peter H. Rothschild, Chair

Janet HillDennis M. Kass

Joseph A. Levato

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin

Peter W. May

 

 *

This Compensation Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Compensation Committee Report by reference into such other filing.

 

 

32        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        29


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the Company’s executive compensation objectives, philosophy and practices and discusses the compensation that was awarded during 20152017 to the individuals identified below (collectively, the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”as our Named Executive Officers.

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (NEOS).

 

             NAME

    

                     POSITION

Emil J. Brolick

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Todd A. Penegor

 

   

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

Gunther Plosch

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Robert D. Wright

 

   

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer and International

 

 

R. Scott Toop

Former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary(through January 17, 2016)

ScottKurt A. WeisbergKane

 

   

 

Chief PeopleConcept & Marketing Officer

 

 

Darrell G. van LigtenE. J. Wunsch

 

   

 

Former Senior Vice President – President, International(through June 8, 2015)

Craig S. Bahner

Former Chief MarketingLegal Officer(through April 2, 2015) and Secretary

 

Compensation Discussion2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In 2017, the Company reported another year of strong performance and Analysis – At a Glance

SECTIONPAGE

2015 Executive Summary

30

A Philosophy of Pay for Performance

32

Objectives of the Executive Compensation Program

32

Emphasis on Variable Compensation

32

Strong Pay-for-Performance Alignment

33

Elements of Executive Compensation

34

How Executive Compensation is Determined

34

Compensation Decisions for 2015

35

Base Salary

35

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

35

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

37

Additional Compensation Decisions

38

Vesting of 2012 Performance Unit Awards

38

Transition of President and Chief Executive Officer Roles

39

Changes to the Executive Compensation Program for 2016

39

Compensation Governance Matters

40

2015 Executive Summary

By nearly every measure, 2015 wasglobal growth, with our North America and International restaurants contributing to our continued strategic and financial progress. We achieved 20 consecutive quarters of positive North America same-restaurant sales, global systemwide sales eclipsed $10 billion for the first time in Company history, North America average unit volumes reached an extraordinary year for Wendy’s, being both a periodall-time high of transformative change$1.61 million, and senior leadership transition.we recorded our highest global net new restaurant growth since 2004. The Company achieved strongsignificantly increased cash flows, and our overall operating and financial results demonstrate the vitality of the Wendy’s brand and continuedvalidate our successful transition to execute our brand vision to Delight Every CustomerTM by providing a Deliciously DifferentTM restaurant experience.predominantly franchised business model. During 2015, the Company2017, we drove significant improvements in both our corporate and restaurant-level economic model, accelerated the transformation of the Wendy’s brand, continued to strengthen the Wendy’s franchise system and created significant value for stockholders. Looking forward, the Company is poised to achieve our 2020 global growth goals by building upon the Company’s current operating momentum, growing the customer base of our restaurants, expanding brand access, enhancing restaurant-level profitability and achieving savings through continued execution of our general and administrative cost savings plan.

The Company’s key operating and financial results for 20152017, along with a summary of key strategic achievements, are highlighted below.Please refer toAnnex A for a reconciliation of thenon-GAAP financial measures (adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted earnings per share and free cash flow) referred to below and in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

 

  

Improving the Core Economic Model

 

 

 Ø

Generated $406.2 million of adjusted EBITDA, a 3.7% increase year-over-year, despite the loss of approximately $57.0 million of adjusted EBITDA attributed to the ownership of 295 fewer Company-operated restaurants. An increase in franchise net rental income, royalties and fees and significant general and administrative cost savings contributed to the improvement.

Improved adjusted EBITDA margin1 by 590 basis points to 33.2%.

Achieved North America system same-restaurant sales growth of 2.0% (3.6% on atwo-year basis).

Improved cash flows from operations by 33.2% to $251.6 million.

Attained positive year-over-year free cash flow2 of $169.9 million, with year-over-year growth of $131.0 million.

 

Delivered adjusted EBITDA growth of 10% to $392 million and adjusted earnings per share growth of 14%7.5% to $0.33 (see$0.43.

1

The Company calculates adjusted EBITDA margin by dividing adjusted EBITDA by total revenues. (SeeAnnex A for the calculation of adjusted EBITDA margin for 2017.)

2

The Company defines “free cash flow” as cash flows from operations minus capital expenditures, both as reported under GAAP. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that is used by the Company as an internal measure of liquidity. (SeeAnnex A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures)measures.)

 

 

Ø

Achieved Company-operated same restaurant sales growth of 2.6% (4.9% on a two-year basis)

Ø

Improved Company-operated restaurant margins by 190 basis points to 17.7%

Ø

Increased average annual unit sales volumes for Company-operated restaurants by 3% to arecord-high $1.64 million

Ø

Completed an attractive fixed-rate debt refinancing through a $2.275 billion whole business securitization

30        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        33


  

Transforming the Wendy’s Brand through “Image Activation”Global Restaurant Development and Image Activation

 

 

 Ø 

Accelerated the enhancement of Wendy’s brand image by reimaging 450 system restaurants and building 70 new system restaurants with innovative interior and exterior designs through our “Image Activation” program

Ø

On track to have 60%+ of Wendy’s North America system restaurants on our Image Activation design by 2020

Ø

Image Activation restaurants continueContinued to contemporize and elevate the restaurant experience and drive increased customer traffic and higher sustained sales through our global growth strategy, driven by new restaurant development and image activation.

Achieved 1.5% global net new restaurant growth, our highest growth rate since 2004, with North America contributing 0.5% and International contributing 14.8% net new restaurant growth in 2017. We opened 174 total new restaurants and 97 net new restaurants globally in 2017.

Accelerated the enhancement of the Wendy’s brand image by reimaging 551 North America restaurants in 2017, an increase from the 521 reimages completed in 2016. At the end of 2017, 43% of Wendy’s global system restaurants were image activated, ahead of prior Company expectations.

 

 

  

Strengthening the Wendy’s System through “System Optimization”

 

 

 Ø 

Sold 327 Company-operated restaurants inRemained focused on recording strong 2017 results and fortifying the U.S. and Canada to new and existing franchisees with a commitment to high operating standards, Image Activation reimaging andWendy’s brand under our predominantly franchised business model, which facilitated our successful attainment of 20 consecutive quarters of positive North America same-restaurant sales, two consecutive years of positive global net new restaurant development as partgrowth andall-time high North America average unit volumes (AUVs) of our “System Optimization” initiative$1.61 million.

 

 

 Ø 

On track to reduce Company-operated restaurant ownership to approximately 5% of the totalFurther optimized our system in 2016

Ø

System Optimization continues to strengthenby strengthening our franchisee base generate improved earnings quality through increased royaltythe facilitation offranchisee-to-franchisee transfers of 540 restaurants in 2017 to new and rental incomeexisting franchisees who are well-capitalized and serve as a catalyst for our brand transformation andcommitted to long-term growth, high operating standards and our global growth strategy.

 

 

  

Creating Significant Value for Stockholders

 

 

 Ø 

Returned $1.1 billionapproximately $196.0 million in cash to stockholders through $127.4 million in share repurchases reducing our shares outstanding by 26%and $68.3 million in dividends.

 

 

 Ø

Deliveredone-, three- and five-year total stockholder return of 24%, 96% and 289%, respectively.

 

Increased our quarterly dividend rate by 9% and returned $72 million8% to 7.0 cents per share in cashthe first quarter of 2017, then subsequently announced in February 2018 an additional 21% increase from 7.0 cents per share to stockholders through dividends8.5 cents per share.

 

 

 Ø 

Delivered one-year and three-year total stockholder returnAnnounced a new $175 million share repurchase authorization from our Board of 21% and 144%Directors in February 2018, which is a 17% increase compared to the prior authorization.

 

The following graph below illustrates our total stockholder return over the past three years relative to the S&P MidCap 400® index, assuming an initial investment of $100 and reinvestment of all dividends when received.

 

LOGO

2015 was also highlighted by the implementation of thoughtful succession planning, as the Company announced that Mr. Brolick planned to retire from management duties with the Company in May 2016. As part of the succession plan, Mr. Penegor was appointed President of the Company effective January 4, 2016, and Mr. Penegor is expected to succeed Mr. Brolick in the Chief Executive Officer role after a transition period that began in the first quarter of 2016. Mr. Brolick is expected to continue to serve on the Board of Directors upon his retirement to ensure continuity of leadership and strategic focus for the Company.

LOGO

 

34        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        31

TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN The Wendy’s Company vs. S&P Midcap 400®


The Company’s strongfavorable performance in 20152017 was reflected in the compensation delivered to our senior executives, as described in this CD&ACompensation Discussion and Analysis and set forth inunder the “2015“2017 Summary Compensation Table” and the related compensation tables, notes and narrativesnarrative that follow. Our significant year-over-year improvements in same restaurantNorth America system same-restaurant sales and adjusted EBITDA supportedperformance resulted in an annual cash incentive payout at 152.6%109.0% of target, prior to adjustment for individual performance.performance (other than for the Chief Executive Officer). In addition, performance unit awards that were granted to senior executives in 2012 vested at 157% of targetFebruary 2015 were based on the Company’stwo equally weighted performance measures, relative total stockholder return of 169% forand the Company’s cumulative adjusted earnings per share performance over the three-year performance period that began on July 2, 2012beginning December 29, 2014 and ended on June 28, 2015.ending December 31, 2017, and resulted in an overall weighted attainment of 167.9% of target.

Notwithstanding strong stockholderOur stockholders expressed positive support of our compensation governance through their 2017 annual “say-on-pay”say-on-pay advisory vote, and the Compensation Committee continued to evaluate ways to further strengthen our commitmentremains committed to best practices in compensation governance. For 2016, we increased the weighting ofgovernance consistent with our key growth metric – same restaurant sales – in our annual cash incentive compensation plan and eliminated the individual performance multiplier for the Chief Executive Officer. We also increased the weighting of the performance unit component of our long-term equity incentive compensation plan from 40% to 50%, with a corresponding decrease in the stock option component.pay-for-performance philosophy. The following table below highlights key features of our executive compensation program that demonstrate the Company’s ongoing commitment to protecting stockholder interests through sound compensation governance practices.

 

 

WHAT WE DO

 

   

 

WHAT WE DO NOT DO

 

ü

 

Hold an annual “say-on-pay”say-on-pay advisory vote for stockholdersstockholders.

  

LOGOLOGO    Provide annual or multi-year incentive guaranteesguarantees.

 

LOGOLOGO    Provide excessive perquisites or benefits to executivesexecutives.

 

LOGOLOGO    Grant equity awards at less than fair market valuevalue.

 

LOGOLOGO    Offer pension or SERP benefits to executivesexecutives.

 

LOGOLOGO    Pay dividends on equity awards that are not earned or vestedvested.

 

LOGOLOGO   Gross-up excise taxes upon a change in controlcontrol.

 

LOGOLOGO    Reprice underwater stock optionsoptions.

 

LOGOLOGO    Permit speculative trading, hedging or derivative transactions in our Common StockStock.

ü

Use an appropriate mix of cash andnon-cash compensation,
with an emphasis on variable(at-risk) compensation.

 

Engage independent outside compensation consultants and utilize market and industry data to ensure we compensate fairly and competitively, but not excessivelyexcessively.

  

ü

Set meaningful performance goals at the beginning of annual
and multi-year performance periods.

 

Balance short-term and long-term compensation to discourage short-term risk taking at the expense of long-term resultsresults.

  

ü

Set meaningful performance goals at the beginning of annual and multi-year performance periods

ü

 

Mitigate undue risk takingrisk-taking by utilizing multiple performance metrics, imposing caps on individual payouts, employing a “clawback”
clawback policy for equity awards and performing an annual compensation risk assessmentassessment.

  

ü

Use an appropriate mix of cash and non-cash compensation, with an emphasis on variable (“at risk”) compensation

ü

 

Limit accelerated vesting of equity awards by requiring a “double
“double trigger” upon a change in controlcontrol.

  

ü

 

Set significant stock ownership and retention guidelines for the Chief Executive Officer and other executivesexecutives.

 

  

A Philosophy of Pay for PerformancePHILOSOPHYOF PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE

Objectives of the Executive Compensation Program

The compensation program for the Company’s senior executives is designed to support the Company’s business objectives by linking executive compensation to individual performance, the Company’s attainment of annual andmulti-year operating and financial goals and the creation of long-term stockholder value. The primary objectives of the executive compensation program are to:

 

  

AttractMotivate achievement of the Company’s performance and retain highly-qualified executives;strategic business goals;

 

 

  

MotivateAttract and rewardretain highly qualified executives for achieving individual and Companyby paying competitive compensation levels if performance goals;commensurate to peers is achieved; and

 

 

  

Align the interests of executives with those of the interests ofCompany’s stockholders.

 

Emphasis on Variable Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of the total compensation for senior executives should be variable (i.e., “at risk”)at-risk) and tied to Company performance. Variable compensation is dependent on our financial and operational success and the achievement of strategic business objectives that create value for our stockholders. Thispay-for-performance philosophy aligns executive pay with the Company’s business objectives and ensures that executives are responsive and accountable to stockholder interests.

 

32        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        35


Total direct compensation for senior executives is composed of three elements: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash incentive compensation;incentives; and (iii) long-term equity incentive compensation.incentives. The charts below illustrate how base salary, annual cash incentive awards (at targeted levels of performance) and long-term equity incentive awardsthese three components (at targeted levels of performance) were allocated for 20152017 to create the overall pay mix for the Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs as a group (excluding Messrs. van Ligten and Bahner, who left the Company during 2015 and did not receive a full-year equity award).group.

 

LOGO

LOGO

As reflected by the charts, performance-based incentives constitute the most significant portion of total direct compensation for senior executives, consistent with the Company’spay-for-performance philosophy. By utilizing a high proportion ofat-risk compensation, the executive compensation program offers senior executives an opportunity for increased compensation in the event of successful Company performance, matched with the prospect of reduced compensation in the event Company performance goals are not achieved.

Strong Pay-for-Performance Alignment of CEO Compensation and Company Performance

The chart below illustrates our pay-for-performance alignment by comparingOur annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives are designed to motivate and reward executive performance based on the Company’s sales and financial results to Mr. Brolick’s total reported compensation overachievements under the past three years. As reflected by the chart, from 2013 to 2015, the Company achieved significant improvements in itsfour key performance metrics – North America Company-operated same restaurant sales growth, adjusted EBITDAof our 2017 annual and adjusted earnings per share – that outpacedlong-term incentive plans.3 Highlighting the increase in Mr. Brolick’salignment between our executive pay and Company performance, the charts below show the total reporteddirect compensation over that time. The increase in Mr. Brolick’s compensation from 2014of our Chief Executive Officer as compared to 2015 was driven by the Company’s improved same restaurant sales and adjusted EBITDA performance which resulted in an above-target cash incentive payout for 2015, compared to a below-target cash incentive payout for 2014.

LOGOunder these four metrics.

 

LOGO

CEO COMPENSATION

This chart indicates the total direct compensation of our Chief Executive Officer for each of 2015, 2016 and 2017, as reported in the “2017 Summary Compensation Table.” Mr. Brolick’s compensation is shown for 2015 when he served as our Chief Executive Officer, and the amounts shown for 2016 and 2017 reflect only Mr. Penegor’s compensation. (Mr. Brolick retired from management duties in May 2016. As part of the Chief Executive Officer succession plan, Mr. Penegor became our President in January 2016 and then succeeded Mr. Brolick as Chief Executive Officer effective in May 2016.)

13 

SeeAnnex A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures. The Company’s 2013 and 20142015 adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share have been reclassified to conform to the 20152016 presentation to reflect (i) the Company’s sale of its bakery operations in May 2015 and presentation of its bakery results as discontinued operations and (ii) changes to the Company’s presentation of its System Optimization initiative in its statements of operations beginning in 2015. The Company has provided reclassified statements of operations and updated reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures on theInvestors section of its website under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

 

36        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement

CEO Pay Mix Performance-Based (At Risk) Compensation: 83% Other NEO Pay Mix Performance-Based (At Risk) Compensation: 71% CEO Compensation


LOGO

SAME-RESTAURANT SALES

On aone- andtwo-year basis, the Company experienced positive same-restaurant sales growth that was achieved by our focus on driving profitable customer counts supported by a balanced marketing strategy. As a result of our efforts, in fourth quarter 2017, we recorded 20 consecutive quarters of positive same-restaurant sales in North America.

LOGO

ADJUSTED EBITDA

The Company’s continued brand transformation and aim to generate higher quality of earnings resulted in a favorable increase in adjusted EBITDA margin from 21.0% in 2015 to 33.2% in 2017. Our adjusted EBITDA remained resilient and increased from $392 million in 2015 to $406 million in 2017, despite a significant reduction in ownership of Company-operated restaurants during that three-year period.

LOGO

ADJUSTED EARNINGSPER SHARE

The strength of the Company’s business model has generated consistent adjusted earnings per share accretion that creates value for our stockholders, as demonstrated by the increase in our adjusted earnings per share from $0.29 at the end of 2014 to $0.43 at the end of 2017, a 48% increase over this three-year period.

LOGO

TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN

Our stockholders were rewarded by the Company’s continued growth in our stock price and dividends, including an increase in the market price of our stock from $8.92 on the last trading day of 2014 to $16.42 on the last trading day of 2017, an 84% increase over this three-year period. We also increased our quarterly cash dividend rate from 5.5 cents per share in first quarter 2015 to 7.0 cents per share in fourth quarter 2017, which was a 27.3% increase over this three-year period.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        3337

Same-Restaurant Sales Growth 20 Consecutive Quarters of Positive SRS in North America Adjusted EBITDA Strong Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA Margin Growth Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA Margin Adjusted Earnings Per Share Solid and Consistent Earnings Growth Total Stockholder Return Delivered Significant 3-Year TSR of 96%


As discussed under the “Emphasis on Variable Compensation” caption above, a substantial portion of our NEO compensation isat-risk compensation. This correlation between executive compensation and Company performance and business results is an important component of our executive compensation strategy, which has been effective in establishing a strong alignment between the Company’s executive compensation and the interests of our stockholders, as well as our ability to attract, motivate and retain executive talent. Thispay-for-performance strategy has resulted in Chief Executive Officer compensation that is reasonable and directly aligned with the Company’s business objectives.

Elements of Executive CompensationELEMENTSOF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The primary components of the executive compensation program are described in the table below.following table.

 

  

COMPONENT

 

PURPOSE

  
 

Base Salary

 

• Attract and retain highly-qualifiedhighly qualified executives by providing an appropriatea competitive level of fixed cash compensation that reflects the experience, responsibilities and performance of each executiveexecutive.

 
 

Annual Cash Incentive CompensationIncentives

 

• Align executive pay with individual and Company performance by motivating and rewarding executives over aone-year time frame period based on the achievement of strategic business objectives and individual performance goalsobjectives.

 
 

Long-Term Equity Incentive CompensationIncentives

 

• Align the interests of executives with the interests of stockholders and retain highly-highly qualified executives by motivating and rewarding executives to achieve multi-year strategic business objectivesobjectives.

 

• Create a direct link between executive pay and the long-term performance of our Common StockStock.

 
 

Perquisites and Benefits

 

• Provide limited perquisites and benefits, consistent with competitive market practicepractice.

 

How Executive Compensation is DeterminedHOW EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONIS DETERMINED

On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews the effectiveness of our executive compensation philosophy, evaluates the performance of our senior executives and establishes the executive compensation program for the currentthen-current year. In determining the appropriate compensation package for senior executives, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its independent outside compensation consultant, FW Cook, & Co., considers a number of factors, including: (i) individual and Company performance; (ii) scope of responsibilities and relative importance of each role; (iii) qualifications and experience; (iv) competitive market practice; (v) internal pay equity; (vi) alignment with stockholder interests; and (vii) creation of long-term stockholder value.

For 2015,2017, consistent with prior years, the Compensation Committee utilized the following approach to guide the Committee in making executive compensation decisions:

 

  

Targeted Compensation Levels.Compensation levels (basefor base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives)incentives are targeted at thea competitive range (i.e., +/-15%) of market median on average,(i.e.,+/-10% for base salary,+/-15% for target total cash compensation and+/-20% for target total direct compensation), with realized actual compensation above or below that median range based on individual and Company performance. Individual executive compensation levels may be set above or below the competitivemedian range depending on unique situations, such as recruiting considerations for new hires, sustained high sustained performance and the degree to which the Company position has greater or lesser responsibilities than the comparable market or industry position.

 

 

  

Competitive Market ReferenceReference.. Data from companies ofwith comparable revenuesrevenue size included in theWillis Towers Watson U.S. CDB General Industry Executive Compensation Survey Report (“General Industry Data”) is used as a reference point to supportevaluate the overall competitiveness of our executive compensation levels, withlevels.

38        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


Also, data from theChain Restaurant Total Rewards Association Executive and Management Compensation Survey Report (“Restaurant Industry Data”) is used as a secondary reference for relevant positions.24

 

 

  

Annual Cash IncentivesIncentives.. The performance measures utilized for annual cash incentive awardsincentives are focused on our key performance metrics that measure earnings and growth, metrics, with adjustments (+of up to+/-25%) to actualcalculated payouts possible based on individual performance.performance for executives other than the Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

  

Long-Term Equity IncentivesIncentives.. Long-term equity incentive awards consist of (i) performance units that are tied to the Company’s achievement of two key financialperformance metrics that measure stockholder value creation and market performance over a three-year performance period and (ii) stock options that vest over three years.

 

The Compensation Committee believes this approach continues to be effective in maintaining a strong link between executive compensation and Company performance, as reflected by the Company’s strong earnings and sales growth in 2015,2017, the continued acceleration in the transformation of the Wendy’s brand and the Company’s ability to attract and retain a highly-qualifiedhighly qualified and motivated leadership team.

Incentive Compensation Performance Metrics

In determining the appropriate incentive compensation award levels for our senior executives, the Subcommittee (i.e., the Performance Compensation Subcommittee) considers the Company’s achievement ofpre-established performance targets focused on a balanced mix of value-driving performance metrics. For the 2017 incentive compensation program, the Subcommittee approved four key performance metrics to measure earnings, growth, stockholder value creation and market performance for purposes of calculating components of our incentive compensation, as shown in the following table.

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTPERFORMANCE METRICS (MEASURES)

Annual Cash Incentives

• Adjusted EBITDA (earnings).

• North America Same-Restaurant Sales (growth).

Performance Units—
Long-Term Equity Incentives

• Adjusted Earnings per Share, Cumulative Three-Year (stockholder value creation).

• Total Stockholder Return Relative to S&P MidCap 400 (market performance).

These four performance metrics and the framework of our executive compensation program are further discussed below under the caption “Compensation Decisions for 2017.” The Subcommittee determined that for 2017, the performance metrics were appropriate and consistent with our executive compensation philosophy because the metrics (i) align with earnings and growth expectations of our stockholders, (ii) serve as key indicators of our business operating performance, growth and profitability and (iii) hold our executives accountable for growth results and operational, relative total stockholder return and market performance against annual and long-term business objectives. The key performance metrics of our 2018 executive compensation program are further discussed below under the caption “Changes to the Executive Compensation Program for 2018.”

 

 24 

With respect to the Compensation Committee’s review of General Industry Data (approximately 465507 companies) and Restaurant Industry Data (approximately 9592 companies): (i) the Committee does not select the companies that provide information for the surveys; (ii) the aggregate survey data is size-adjusted prior to being provided to the Committee; and (iii) the Committee does not link information back to particular companies as the aggregate survey data is reported by executive position and not by company. The Compensation Committee utilizes this broad-based, third-party survey data to gain a general understanding of the current compensation practices and trends in the market and the restaurant industry. As described above, competitive market practice is only one of several factors considered by the Compensation Committee when approving the elements and amounts of compensation awarded to senior executives.

 

 

34        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        39


2017Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The Company used adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share for the 2017 key performance metrics, each of which arenon-GAAP financial measures, as internal measures of the Company’s business operating performance and as performance measures for benchmarking against our peers and competitors (seeAnnex A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP financial measures). The Compensation Decisions for 2015Committee determined that using these measures (i) provides our stockholders with a meaningful perspective of how our executive incentive compensation links to the underlying operating performance of our current business and (ii) enables our stockholders to better understand and evaluate our historical and prospective operating performance as it relates to executive incentive compensation awards. The Compensation Committee believes that adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share are important supplemental measures of the Company’s operating performance because these metrics eliminate items that vary from period to period without correlation to our core operating performance, as well as highlight trends in our business that might not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on GAAP financial measures.

COMPENSATION DECISIONSFOR 2017

Base Salary

In February 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries for the Company’s senior executives, taking into account individual and Company performance and the other factors described above under the caption “How Executive Compensation is Determined.” After consulting with its independent outside compensation consultant, FW Cook, & Co., and considering recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer with respect to the other members of the senior executive leadership team, the Compensation Committee approved base salary increases for certain executives, including Mr. Penegor ($30,000), Mr. Plosch ($25,000), Mr. Wright ($10,000)22,000), Mr. ToopKane ($25,000)15,000) and Mr. WeisbergWunsch ($10,000). In approving these increases, the Compensation Committee noted that the base salaries of the senior executives remained within thea competitive range of market median, on average,in the aggregate, consistent with the Company’s executive compensation philosophy. Mr. Brolick’s base salary was established in June 2014 as part of an amendment to his employment agreement,

Guiding Principles for Annual and remained unchanged for 2015.

Annual CashLong-Term Incentive CompensationPlans

In February 2015,2017, the Subcommittee approved the 20152017 annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive compensation framework for senior executives. Consistent with prior years,The design of the 20152017 annual and long-term incentive plans was guided by four key principles:

Growth must be achieved for any payment.Growth over the prior year is required for incentive payouts, even at threshold levels of performance.

Reward executives consistent with external stockholder guidance.Target payout levels were designed to motivate and reward performance that is equal to or greater than the Company’s external stockholder guidance range to align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Align executive compensation with Company performance relative to restaurant industry competitors.Performance goals werepre-established taking into consideration the historic performance of the Company’s peers as well as stockholder expectations.

Establish challenging and appropriate incentive performance goals.Incentive design and payouts should support achievement of the Company’s growth goals and align with the Company’s annual operating plan, with achievement of performance targets resulting in target incentive payouts and outperformance of business goals providing for additional compensation opportunities.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

The 2017 annual incentive plan was based on the achievement of two key performance metrics – metrics—adjusted EBITDA and same restaurantsame-restaurant sales. Adjusted EBITDA is a keymeasures earnings metric thatand reflects the Company’s focus on increasing operating profitability, while same restaurantsame-restaurant sales is a keymeasures growth metric thatand represents a fundamental operating performance measure for the Company’s business. In selecting these metrics, the Subcommittee noted that adjusted EBITDA and same restaurantsame-restaurant sales are prevalent restaurant industry measures, and management’s ability to attain thepre-established goals for these metrics was critical to achieving the Company’s operating and financial goalsbusiness objectives for 20152017 and driving long-term stockholder value.

40        The design of the 2015 executive incentive plan was guided by four key principles:Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement

Growth must be achieved for any payment. Even at threshold performance payout levels, the Company must achieve adjusted EBITDA growth over the prior year and positive same restaurant sales growth.

Reward executives consistent with external stockholder guidance. Target payout levels were established for performance at the low-end of the Company’s external stockholder guidance, with an acceleration of the payout curve to incentivize management to achieve the high-end of guidance.

Align executive compensation with Company performance. Target payout levels were set to provide median pay for median performance relative to competitors within the restaurant industry, while performance above (or below) target would result in payouts above (or below) median levels of pay.

Reward individual performance. Cash incentive payouts can be adjusted by up to +/-25% based on an assessment of each executive’s individual performance. In no event may an executive’s payout exceed the maximum incentive award opportunity established for that individual.


The following table below identifies the performance metrics, incentive opportunities and actual results achieved under the 2015 executive2017 annual incentive plan.

Design of 2015 Executive Incentive Plan (Corporate Incentive Grid)DESIGNOF 2017 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

 

PERFORMANCE METRIC WEIGHT 

THRESHOLD

(50% PAYOUT)

  

TARGET

(100% PAYOUT)

  

MAXIMUM

(200% PAYOUT)

  

2015 ACTUAL

ACHIEVEMENT

  

2015 ACTUAL

PAYOUT %

  

WEIGHTED

PAYOUT %

 

Adjusted EBITDA3

 70%        $372M          $391M          $415M          $408.5M          172.9%    121.0%  

Same Restaurant Sales4

 30%  +0.5%    +2.5%          +3.5%    +2.6%    105.2%    31.6%  
       

 

 

 

2015 Total Payout %

        152.6%  
       

 

 

 

  PERFORMANCE METRIC

 

 

WEIGHT

 

 

THRESHOLD

(50% PAYOUT)

 

 

TARGET

(100% PAYOUT)

 

 

MAXIMUM

(200% PAYOUT)

 

 

2017 ACTUAL

ACHIEVEMENT

 

 

2017 ACTUAL

PAYOUT %

 

 

WEIGHTED

PAYOUT %

 

 

 

  Adjusted EBITDA5

 

 60%

 

 $375.0M

 

 $400.0M

 

 $430.0M

 

 $406.2M

 

 121.0%

 

  

 

72.6%

 

 

 

 

  Same-Restaurant Sales6

 40% +0.50% +2.30% +4.25% +2.02% 91.0%  36.4% 
       

 

 

 

 

 

  2017 Total Payout %

       

 

 

 

109.0%

 

 

       

 

 

 

The following table shows the target opportunities and actual payouts for the NEOs under the 2017 annual incentive plan. The target payout levels are expressed as a percentage of base salary in effect as of the end of 2017. Annual cash incentive payouts can be adjusted upward or downward by 25% based on an assessment of each executive’s individual performance for all NEOs other than the Chief Executive Officer. In no event may an executive’s payout exceed the maximum incentive award opportunity established for that individual. Our Chief Executive Officer is not eligible for individual performance adjustments because the Compensation Committee determined that Chief Executive Officer performance is reflected in the aggregate results of our senior executive leadership team and the Company’s overall short- and long-term financial results. In approving the target payout levels, the Subcommittee noted that the 2017 target total cash compensation for the Company’s senior executives fell within a competitive range of market median, in the aggregate, consistent with the Company’s executive compensation philosophy. The actual payouts for the NEOs were approved by the Subcommittee in February 2018 based on the Company’s 2017 adjusted EBITDA and same-restaurant sales results and the application of individual performance multipliers for each NEO other than our Chief Executive Officer.

TARGET PAYOUT LEVELSAND ACTUAL PAYOUTSUNDER 2017 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN7

 

PARTICIPANT

 

ANNUAL

 SALARY ($) 

 

INCENTIVE

TARGET AS
 % OF SALARY 

 

ANNUAL

INCENTIVE

TARGET ($)

 

 WEIGHTED PAYOUT 

% ACHIEVED

FOR 2017

 

 

INDIVIDUAL

 PERFORMANCE 

MULTIPLIER

 

TOTAL 2017

 ANNUAL INCENTIVE 

PAYOUT ($)

 

 

Todd A. Penegor

 

 

 

930,000

 

 

125%

 

 

 

1,162,500

 

 

109%

 

 

 

 

1,267,125

 

 

 

Gunther Plosch

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

75%

 

 

 

375,000

 

 

109%

 

115%

 

 

 

470,000

 

 

 

Robert D. Wright

 

 

 

552,000

 

 

75%

 

 

 

414,000

 

 

109%

 

109%

 

 

 

490,000

 

 

 

Kurt A. Kane

 

 

 

450,000

 

 

75%

 

 

 

337,500

 

 

109%

 

110%

 

 

 

405,000

 

 

 

E. J. Wunsch

 

 

 

410,000

 

 

75%

 

 

 

307,500

 

 

109%

 

112%

 

 

 

375,000

 

 

The individual performance multipliers for Messrs. Plosch, Wright, Kane and Wunsch reflect Mr. Penegor’s assessment of each executive’s performance during 2017 as measured againstpre-established performance goals set at the beginning of

 

35 

Adjusted EBITDAEBITDA” is defined as earnings for fiscal 20152017 before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted (i) within the “Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA from Continuing Operations to Net Income”EBITDA” non-GAAP reconciliation table (or similarly titled non-GAAP reconciliation table) as presented in the Company’s fiscal 20152017 earnings release and (ii) to exclude the impact of specific non-recurring and unusual items or other adjustments, to the extent approved by the Subcommittee. TheFor purposes of the 2017 annual incentive plan, the specific adjustments applied in calculating adjusted EBITDA for purposes of the 2015 executive incentive plan from the Company’s reported 20152017 financial results are shown inAnnex A. The difference between the 2015 executive incentive plan adjusted EBITDA of $408.5 million and the Company’s reported 2015 adjusted EBITDA of $392.4 million was attributable to the sale of the Company’s bakery operations in May 2015, as further described inAnnex A.

 

46 

Same restaurant sales“Same-restaurant sales” is defined as same restaurantNorth America system same-restaurant sales for North America Company-operated restaurants and franchised restaurants located in the U.S. and Canada, excluding the impact of currency translation. Same restaurantSame-restaurant sales are reported for new restaurants that have been open for at least 15 continuous months and for remodeledreimaged restaurants that have been reopened for three continuous months.as soon as they reopen.

 

7

In conjunction with establishing the 2017 annual incentive plan, the Subcommittee approved an Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)-compliant plan with a threshold performance goal for 2017 of net operating profit (before taxes) of $180.5 million, excluding: (i) all asset write-downs (including asset impairment and goodwill impairment charges); (ii) reorganization and realignment costs; and (iii) “System optimization gains, net” as reported by the Company on its financial statements. Achievement of this performance goal (which was $20.8 million higher than the 2016 performance goal) allowed for the funding of an annual incentive pool with maximum incentive award opportunities for eligible participants. Based on 2017 results, the Subcommittee certified that the Company satisfied such threshold performance goal. The Subcommittee then approved incentive payouts to senior executives under the 2017 annual incentive plan based on the Company’s achievement of the performance metrics under that plan (i.e., adjusted EBITDA and same-restaurant sales), as adjusted for individual performance, which resulted in payouts below the maximum incentive award opportunities established for purposes of Section 162(m).

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        3541


The table below shows the target annual cash incentive opportunities and actual payouts for the NEOs under the 2015 executive incentive plan. The target payout levels were established as part of the NEOs’ overall employment terms with the Company, and are expressed as a percentage of base salary in effect as of the end of 2015. In approving the target payout levels, the Subcommittee noted that the 2015 target total cash compensation for the Company’s senior executives fell within the competitive range of market median, on average, consistent with the Company’s executive compensation philosophy. The actual payouts for the NEOs were approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2016 based on the Company’s adjusted EBITDA and same restaurant sales results and the application of individual performance multipliers.

Target Payout Levels and Actual Payouts under 2015 Executive Incentive Plan5

PARTICIPANT 

ANNUAL

SALARY ($)

  

INCENTIVE TARGET

AS %OF SALARY

  

ANNUAL INCENTIVE

TARGET ($)

  

WEIGHTED PAYOUT %

ACHIEVEDFOR2015

  

INDIVIDUAL

PERFORMANCE

MULTIPLIER

  

TOTAL 2015 ANNUAL

INCENTIVE PAYOUT ($)6

 

Emil J. Brolick

  1,150,000    150  1,725,000    152.6  125  3,290,438  

Todd A. Penegor

  675,000    75  506,250    152.6  125  965,672  

Robert D. Wright

  485,000    75  363,750    152.6  115  638,345  

R. Scott Toop

  490,000    75  367,500    152.6  N/A    560,805  

Scott A. Weisberg

  415,000    75  311,250    152.6  115  546,213  

Darrell G. van Ligten

  425,000    75  318,750    85.8%7   N/A    119,136  

Craig S. Bahner

  475,000    75  356,250    152.6  N/A    137,026  

The Subcommittee determined the individual performance multiplier for Mr. Brolick based on his performance during 2015 in consideration of: (i) the Company’s strong operating and financial results, including year-over-year growth in same restaurant sales, average unit sales volumes, restaurant margins, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share; (ii) the accelerated transformation of the Wendy’s brand through new restaurant development, Image Activation reimaging and investment in consumer-facing technology; (iii) the continued execution of the Company’s System Optimization initiative, along with the strategic disposition of the Company’s bakery operations; and (iv) the significant value created for stockholders through the Company’s debt refinancing, share repurchase programs and increased dividends. The Subcommittee also took into account Mr. Brolick’s leadership and commitment to investing in and growing the Wendy’s brand, building a highly-qualified executive team, implementing senior leadership succession plans and delivering “A Cut Above” restaurant experience to our customers.

The individual performance multipliers for Messrs. Penegor, Wright and Weisberg reflect Mr. Brolick’s assessment of each executive’s performance during 2015.fiscal year. The Subcommittee determined that positive adjustments were appropriate to reward these executives’ contributions to the Company’s strong financial performance and successful execution of itsour strategic initiatives in 2015.2017.

5

In conjunction with establishing the 2015 executive incentive plan, the Subcommittee approved an Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)-compliant plan with a threshold performance goal for 2015 of net operating profit (before taxes) of $134.3 million, excluding: (i) asset write-downs (including asset impairment and goodwill impairment charges); (ii) reorganization and realignment costs; and (iii) costs associated with the Company’s System Optimization initiative. Achievement of this performance goal (which was $4.4 million higher than the 2014 performance goal) allowed for the funding of an annual incentive pool with maximum incentive award opportunities for eligible participants. Based on 2015 results, the Subcommittee certified that the Company satisfied the threshold performance goal through its achievement of adjusted net operating profit of $247.4 million. The Subcommittee then approved incentive payouts to senior executives under the 2015 executive incentive plan based on the Company’s achievement of the performance metrics under that plan (i.e., adjusted EBITDA and same restaurant sales), as adjusted for individual performance, which resulted in payouts below the maximum incentive award opportunities established for purposes of Section 162(m).

6

Under the terms of the 2015 executive incentive plan, Messrs. Toop, van Ligten and Bahner were not eligible for payment of their cash incentive awards because their employment was terminated prior to the incentive award payment date. However, pursuant to the terms of their respective employment and separation agreements, Messrs. Toop, van Ligten and Bahner received certain payments and benefits in connection with their termination, including payments in respect of their 2015 cash incentive awards. For more information regarding these payments and benefits, see “Employment Agreements” below.

7

In his role as President, International, Mr. van Ligten received 25% of his incentive award opportunity according to the Corporate Incentive Grid described above and 75% according to an International Incentive Grid based on three performance metrics – International adjusted EBITDA (30%), International system sales growth (40%) and International new units opened (30%).

36        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

In February 2015,2017, the Subcommittee approved the 20152017 long-term equity incentive compensation framework for senior executives. Consistent with the prior years, the 2015year, 2017 long-term equity incentive awards were comprised of equally weighted performance units and stock options, as summarized in the table below.following table.

Design of 2015 Long-Term Equity Incentive AwardsDESIGNOF 2017 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

 

COMPONENT

 

WEIGHT

 

VESTING

 

TIMINGOF GRANT8

 

RATIONALE

Performance Units

 40%50% 

3-year•   Three-year cliff vesting, subject to the Company’s achievement ofof pre-determined, objective
performance metricsmetrics.

 

First•   Granted first quarter (February 2015)2017)

 

•   Performance metrics are aligned withestablished at the beginning of the Company’s full fiscal years during thethree-year performance periodperiod.

 

•   Value is dependent on the Company’s achievement ofmulti-year strategic business objectives and the price of our Common StockStock.

 

•   Cliff vesting requires executives to remain with the Company through the vesting dateperformance period to realize the full value of the awardaward.

Stock
Options

 60%50% 

3-year•  Three-year ratable vestingvesting.

 

Third•   Granted third quarter (August 2015)2017)

 

•   Consistent with historical practice and the timing of long-term equity awards to other eligible employeesemployees.

 

•   Delivers value only if the price of our Common Stock increasesincreases.

 

•   Aligns the interests of executives with the long-term interests of stockholdersstockholders.

Payout2017 Performance Unit Awards.The extent of the 2015vesting and payout of the 2017 performance unit awards is based on the Company’s achievement of the performance goals under two equally-weighted performance metrics – cumulative adjusted earnings per share and relative total stockholder return – over a three-year performance period (December 29, 2014(January 2, 2017 through December 31, 2017)29, 2019), as described in the table below.following table.

Performance Metrics for 2015 Performance Unit AwardsPERFORMANCE METRICSFOR 2017 PERFORMANCE UNIT AWARDS

 

PERFORMANCE METRIC

 

THRESHOLD

(37.5%PAYOUT)

 

TARGET

(100%PAYOUT)

 

MAXIMUM

(200%PAYOUT)

 

RATIONALE

Adjusted Earnings Per Share9

 

(Compounded Annual Growth Rate)

 5% 10% 20% 

•  Motivates executives to achieve consistent, long-term earnings growth

 

•  Rewards executives based on an internal operating measure with clear line of sight

Relative Total Stockholder Return

 

(Ranking vs. S&P MidCap 400)

 25th
Percentile
 50th
Percentile
 ³ 90th
Percentile
 

•  Motivates executives to drive superior, long-term growth in share price and dividends

 

•  Rewards executives based on the Company’s relative performance compared to a broad market index

In selecting the performance metrics for the 2015 performance units, the Subcommittee considered that the 2014 performance unit awards had been based on a single performance metric – adjusted earnings per share. For 2015, the Subcommittee, in consultation with its independent outside compensation consultant, Cook & Co., decided to add a second performance metric – relative total stockholder return – to the performance unit awards. The Subcommittee added this second metric in recognition of evolving marketplace trends to utilize multiple performance metrics in incentive plan design and because the Subcommittee believes that relative total stockholder return is an important indicator of the Company’s financial performance compared to the market. The Subcommittee concluded that the design of the 2015 performance units was consistent with market and industry practice and intended to align with stockholder interests and the creation of long-term stockholder value.

PERFORMANCE METRIC 

THRESHOLD

(37.5% PAYOUT)

 

TARGET

(100% PAYOUT)

 

MAXIMUM

(200% PAYOUT)

 RATIONALE

Adjusted Earnings Per Share,

Cumulative Three-Year9

 $1.40 $1.54 $1.90 

•   Motivates executives to achieve consistent, long-term earnings growth.

(Compounded Annual Growth Rate)

 8% 13% 25% 

•   Rewards executives based on an internal operating measure with clear line of sight.

 

Relative Total Stockholder Return

(Ranking vs. S&P MidCap 400)

 25th

Percentile

 50th

Percentile

 ³ 90th

Percentile

 

•   Motivates executives to drive superior, long-term growth in share price and dividends.

 

•   Rewards executives based on the Company’s relative performance compared to a broad market index.

 

 

 

8 

The Subcommittee has not adopted any formal policy to time the grant of equity awards with the release ofnon-public information and retains discretion to determine the grant dates for annual and special equity awards taking into account all relevant factors. All of the performance unit awards and stock options granted to senior executives during 20152017 were issued during open trading windows established under the Company’s Securities Trading Policy.

 

9 

Adjusted Earnings Per Shareearnings per share” is defined as diluted net income per share (after taxes) as reported on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, as adjusted (i) within the “Reconciliation of Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share to Adjusted Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations to Net Income and Diluted Earnings Perper Share”non-GAAP reconciliation table (or similarly titlednon-GAAP reconciliation table) as presented in the Company’s fiscal 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 earnings releases and (ii) to exclude theafter-tax impact of any other extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring events as described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable fiscal year.

 

 

42        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        37


The Subcommittee considered both cumulative adjusted earnings per share and relative total stockholder return to be important indicators of Company performance compared to the market. Further, the Subcommittee selected these two performance metrics in recognition of compensation governance best practices and marketplace trends to utilize multiple performance metrics in long-term incentive plan design. The Subcommittee concluded that the design of the 2017 performance unit awards was consistent with market and industry practice and intended to align with stockholder interests and the creation of long-term stockholder value.

Following the end of the performance period, the Subcommittee will review the extent to which the performance metrics have been achieved under the 2017 long-term incentive plan and will determine the number of shares of Common Stock that are issuable to each participant. Under the terms of the awards, there is no vesting of performance units if actual performance falls below threshold levels of performance. Consistent with prior year awards, the performance units include dividend equivalent rights, representing the right to receive additional performance units in lieu of cash dividends paid with respect to the shares of Common Stock actually earned, if any, at the completion of the performance period.

Grant Date Target Value of 2017 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards.The Subcommittee determined the grant date target value of the 20152017 long-term equity incentive awards for senior executives by assessing the impact of the value of these awards on each executive’s target total target direct compensation, competitive market practices and considering the performance of the Company and each executive during 2014.executive.

In determining the grant date target value of Mr. Brolick’s 2015Penegor’s 2017 long-term equity incentive award, the Subcommittee discussed Mr. Penegor’s 2017 performance objectives and 2016 performance results, including certain quantitative and qualitative measures, and gave particular consideration to Mr. Brolick’sPenegor’s leadership role in driving improved Company performance during 2014, including: (i) enhancing stockholder value by returning $374 million2016 and his contributions to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases; (ii) transforming the Wendy’s brand and contemporizing the restaurant experience through new restaurant development, Image Activation reimaging and investment in consumer-facing technology; (iii) improving the quality of earnings by selling over 250 Company-operated restaurants to franchisees as part of System Optimization, resulting in a more predictable earnings stream from a higher percentage of royalty and rental income; and (iv) strengthening the Company’s economic model through reductionssuccess since he became Chief Executive Officer in general and administrative expense, improvements in restaurant margins and growth in same restaurant sales, average unit sales volumes, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share. After considering all relevant factors, includingMay 2016. The Subcommittee also discussed competitive market compensation data and information provided by itsthe Subcommittee’s independent outside compensation consultant, Cook & Co.,FW Cook. After considering the foregoing and all other relevant factors, the Subcommittee determined that a 20152017 long-term equity incentive award valued at $3,750,000with a grant date target value of $3,250,000 (which placed Mr. Brolick’sPenegor’s target total direct compensation for 20152017 at approximately the high-endlower end of thea competitive range of market median) was appropriate in light of Mr. Brolick’sPenegor’s recent promotion to Chief Executive Officer in May 2016 and experience relative to the market. This compares to his 2016 long-term equity incentive award with a grant date target value of $2,750,000, with the increase reflective of competitive practice, as well as Mr. Penegor’s exceptional leadership and the continued momentum in the Company’s performance, strategic direction and brand relevance and strategic direction.economic relevance.

The values of the 20152017 long-term equity incentive awards for Messrs. Penegor,Plosch, Wright, ToopKane and WeisbergWunsch were determined by the Subcommittee after consideration of several factors, including individual and Company performance, the value of prior year awards, competitive market practice, internal pay equity, the terms of individual employment agreementsarrangements (if applicable) and recommendations from Mr. Brolick.Penegor. In approving these awards, the Subcommittee noted that the 20152017 target total direct compensation for senior executives other than Mr. Brolick fell within thea competitive range of market median, on average,in the aggregate, consistent with the Company’s executive compensation philosophy.

Retention Long-Term Equity Incentive Award for Mr. Kane.To reinforce the retention and engagement of Mr. Kane in his current leadership role, in August 2017, the Compensation Committee approved aone-time retention long-term equity incentive award for Mr. Kane. This retention award was provided in addition to the equity incentive award granted to Mr. Kane under our 2017 long-term incentive plan for senior executives. The retention award was valued at $250,000, consisted of restricted stock units and is subject to a three-year cliff vesting period that requires Mr. Kane to remain with the Company until the vesting date to realize the full value of the award.

Additional Compensation DecisionsADDITIONAL COMPENSATION DECISIONS

Vesting of 20122014 Performance Unit Awards

In July 2012,February 2014, the Subcommittee awarded performance units to the Company’s senior executives, including Messrs. Brolick, ToopPenegor and Weisberg,Wright, as part of the Company’s 20122014 executive compensation program. The performance units vested atand became payable upon the endconclusion of athe three-year performance period that began on July 2, 2012 and ended on June 28, 2015,(December 30, 2013 through January 1, 2017), based on the Company’s total stockholder return compared to a peer groupachievement of 19 restaurant companies, asadjusted earnings per share growth over such performance period. The performance goal, actual achievement and payout levels are described in the table below.following table.

 

PERFORMANCE

COMPANY TSR RANKINGVS. PEER  GROUP

PAYOUTAS % OF TARGET

Maximum Level

³ 90th Percentile200%

Actual Achievement (169% TSR)

72.8th Percentile157%

Target Level

50th Percentile100%

Threshold Level

25th Percentile37.5%

Below Threshold Level

< 25th Percentile0%

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        43


   

 

ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE10

PERFORMANCE

 

  

VALUE

 

  

 

COMPOUNDED

GROWTH RATE

 

  

 

PAYOUT AS 

OF TARGET    

 

 

Below Threshold Level

 

  

< $0.32

 

  

 

  

0.0%

 

 

Threshold Level

 

  

$0.32

 

  

2.0%

 

  

37.5%

 

 

Above Threshold

 

  

$0.35

 

  

5.0%

 

  

75.0%

 

 

Target Level

 

  

$0.40

 

  

10.0%

 

  

100.0%

 

 

Above Target

 

  

$0.45

 

  

14.0%

 

  

150.0%

 

 

Maximum Level

 

  

$0.50

 

  

19.0%

 

  

200.0%

 

 

Actual Achievement

 

  

$0.41

 

  

10.8%

 

  

110.0%

 

In July 2015,February 2017, the Subcommittee certified the Company’s achievement of the relative total stockholder returnadjusted earnings per share performance goal, determined the number of shares of Common Stock that were issuable in respect of outstanding awardsgoals and approved share payouts equal to 110% of the performance unit awards to Mr. Brolick (419,155 shares), Mr. Toop (83,827Penegor (53,206 shares) and Mr. Weisberg (69,856 shares)Wright (19,346) without exercising negative discretion.

38        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Transition of President and Chief Executive Officer Roles

In October 2015, the Company announced that Mr. Brolick, our Chief Executive Officer, planned to retire from management duties with the Company in May 2016, and that Mr. Penegor, our Chief Financial Officer, was expected to succeed Mr. Brolick in the President and Chief Executive Officer role after a transition period beginning in the first quarter of 2016. As part of the succession plan, Mr. Penegor was appointed President of the Company effective January 4, 2016.

In December 2015, the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee, in consultation with their independent outside compensation consultant, Cook & Co., discussed the transition plan and approved the following changes to Mr. Penegor’s compensation effective upon his assumption of the duties of President: (i) an annual base salary of $900,000; (ii) an annual target cash incentive opportunity beginning in 2016 of 125% of his annual base salary; and (iii) a long-term equity incentive compensation award value for 2016 within the range of $2,200,000 to $3,500,000. In approving these changes, the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee reviewed all components of Mr. Penegor’s compensation, discussed Mr. Penegor’s performance and contributions to the Company’s strong financial results and stockholder returns, considered the compensation paid in prior years to Mr. Brolick as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and noted that Mr.  Penegor’s target total direct compensation for 2016 fell within the competitive range of market median.

Changes to the Executive Compensation Program for 20162018

In December 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy. As part of that review, the Compensation Committeephilosophy and determined that the executive compensation program hadhas been effective in attracting and retaining top talent, wasis strongly aligned with the interests of stockholders and providedprovides a significant linkagelink between executive paycompensation and Company performance. Following discussionsAccordingly, the Compensation Committee, after consultation with their independent outsideFW Cook, decided to continue the current executive compensation consultant, Cook & Co., and management,program, subject to certain enhancements as approved by the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee approved certain enhancements todescribed in the following table. The Compensation Committee determined that the framework of the 2018 executive compensation program for 2016, as described inreinforces ourpay-for-performance philosophy and aligns with the table below.Company’s business strategies and our stockholders’ interests.

 

  G2018 EUIDELINEXECUTIVE/COMPONENTOMPENSATION PROGRAM

  

MRODIFICATIONATIONALE

 

RATIONALE

Targeted Compensation Levels Annual Cash Incentives

  

•  Maintained a 40% weighting and focus on growth metrics:

¡   Introduced global systemwide sales, weighted at 20%, as an additional key growth performance metric.

¡   With the addition of the new global systemwide sales measure, decreased the weighting of the same-restaurant sales key growth performance metric from 40% to 20%.

•  Retained adjusted EBITDA, weighted at 60%, as a key earnings performance metric.

•  Consistent with the Company’s objectives to drive global unit growth and organic growth of existing restaurants through increased sales and customer visits.

•  Recognizes the Company’s transition to a predominantly franchised business model.

(Table continued on the following page.)

10

With respect to the 2014 performance unit awards only, “adjusted earnings per share” was defined as diluted net income (loss) per share (after taxes) attributable to The Wendy’s Company as reported on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable fiscal year, as adjusted to exclude the after-tax impact of certain adjustments detailed in the performance unit award agreement. In determining whether an executive’sFebruary 2017, the Subcommittee also determined that the Company’s sale of its bakery operations in May 2015 and presentation of its bakery results as discontinued operations fell within the provisions of the 2014 performance unit award agreements that allowed reported earnings per share adjustments for, among other things, extraordinary, unusual or non-recurring events. This determination resulted in the exclusion of the bakery’s earnings per share impact of $0.01 from the performance results. (This treatment was consistent with the computation of adjusted earnings per share that was applied to the vesting of the 2013 performance unit awards.)

44        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

RATIONALE

 Performance Units —Long-Term
Equity Incentives

•  Added cumulative three-year free cash flow, weighted at 50%, as a key earnings performance metric, which replaced cumulative three-year adjusted earnings per share, weighted at 50%.

•  Retained relative total stockholder return, weighted at 50%, as a key market performance metric.

•  Aligns with the Company’s long-term business goals and increased investor focus on free cash flow.

•  Reinforces the strong link between executive compensation is competitive,and Company performance.

•  Further aligns our executive compensation program with our long-term growth strategies and strengthens ourpay-for-performance philosophy.

 Peer Group Utilization

•  The Compensation Committee will continue utilizing General Industry Data for all NEOs and restaurant industry survey data for all NEOs other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

•  For Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer compensation, the Compensation Committee will view the “competitive range”utilize an industry peer group as a secondary compensation benchmark, in lieu of market median as follows:

O   Base salary: +/-10%

O   Target total cash compensation: +/-15%

O   Target total direct compensation: +/-20%

(Previously, the competitive range was viewed as +/-15% of market median for all components of compensation)restaurant industry survey data.

 

  

•  Aligns with recommended best practice and provides a more meaningful market comparison for senior executive roles, given the Company’s high percentage of performance-based compensation

Annual Cash Incentive

Compensationroles.

 

•    Increased the weighting of the same restaurant sales performance metric from 30% to 40% (with a corresponding decrease in the weighting of the adjusted EBITDA performance metric from 70% to 60%)

•    Transitioned the basis for measuring North America same restaurant sales growth from Company-operated restaurants to system restaurants

•    Discontinued the individual performance multiplier of +/-25% for the Chief Executive Officer

•    Consistent with the Company’s increased emphasis on achieving organic growth through increased sales and customer visits

•    Recognizes the Company’s ongoing transition to a predominantly franchised business model

•    Reinforces the strong link between Company performance and CEO compensation

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation  

•    Increased the weighting of the performance unit component from 40% to 50% of the total award value (with a corresponding decrease in the weighting of the stock option component from 60% to 50%)

•    Further aligns the executive compensation program with our long-term growth strategies and strengthens our pay-for-performance philosophy

2018Non-GAAP Financial Measures.The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        39will use adjusted EBITDA, global systemwide sales and free cash flow for the 2018 key performance metrics, each of which arenon-GAAP financial measures, as internal measures of the Company’s business operating performance and as performance measures for benchmarking against our peers and competitors (seeAnnex A for a reconciliation of 2017non-GAAP financial measures). The Compensation Committee determined that utilization of adjusted EBITDA and global systemwide sales (i) provides our stockholders with a meaningful perspective of how our executive incentive compensation links to the underlying operating performance of our current business and (ii) enables our stockholders to better understand and evaluate our historical and prospective operating performance as it relates to executive incentive compensation awards. The Compensation Committee also determined that free cash flow, which we define as cash flows from operations minus capital expenditures (both as reported under GAAP), is an important liquidity measure that communicates how much cash flow is available for working capital needs or for repurchasing shares, paying dividends, repaying or refinancing debt, financing possible acquisitions or investments, or other uses of cash. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee considers these threenon-GAAP measures to be important supplemental measures of the Company’s operating performance because these metrics eliminate items that vary from period to period without correlation to our core operating performance, as well as highlight trends in our business that might not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on GAAP financial measures.


Compensation Governance MattersCOMPENSATION GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Clawback Provisions in Equity Awards

All of the equity awards granted to senior executives and other eligible participants during 20152017 contain “clawback”clawback provisions in favor of the Company, as described below.

 

  

In the event of a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Compensation Committee will review the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement (including any potential wrongdoing by the participant) and may, in its sole discretion, direct the Company to recover all or a portion of the award or any gain realized on the vesting, exercise or settlement of the award.

 

 

  

If a court determines that a participant has engaged in any “detrimental activity” (as defined in the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan), the Company may cancel the award and require the participant to return the award or any gain realized on the vesting, exercise or settlement of the award.

 

 

  

If the Company is required by law to include an additional clawback or forfeiture provision in an outstanding award, then such provision will apply to the award as if it had been included in the award on its grant date.

 

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted theStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executive Officers and Directors (the “Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines”) that require executive officers and directors to own a specified number of shares of Common Stock based on the executive’s annual base salary or the director’s annual cash retainer for serving

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        45


on the Board. The guidelines, which are described below under the caption “Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executive Officers and Directors,” are intended to encourage executives and directors to maintain a long-term equity stake in the Company, align the interests of executives and directors with the interests of stockholders and promote the Company’s commitment to sound corporate governance.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The Board of Directors has adopted a Securities Trading Policy to assist the Company’s employees and directors in complying with securities laws and avoiding even the appearance of improper conduct. Under this policy, executives and directors are prohibited from engaging in speculative transactions or transactions that are intended to hedge or offset the value of Company securities they already own. Specifically, executives and directors: (i) may not sell Company securities that are not then owned; (ii) may not engage in transactions in publicly traded options of Company securities; (iii) may not engage in any other hedging transactions withoutpre-clearance from the Company’s legal department; (iv) may not sell Company securities within six months of their purchase; and (v) are discouraged from pledging or hypothecating Company securities. AsFurthermore, Company securities held in a margin account or otherwise pledged as collateral for a loan do not count toward satisfaction of the applicable Common Stock ownership requirement under the Company’sStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines.As of the date of this Proxy Statement, none of the Company’s executive officers or directors has pledged any shares of Common Stock.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Repeal of Section 162(m) Performance-Based Compensation Exemption.In evaluating our executive compensation program for 2017, the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee considered the potential impact on the Company of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposesCode. As effective in 2017, Section 162(m) imposed a $1.0 million limit on the deduction thatamount the Company may claimcould deduct for compensation paid in any tax year with respect to compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the three most-highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. CertainOfficer (“covered executives”). At the time the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee made its compensation decisions with respect to the compensation awarded to covered executives in 2017, certain types of “performance-based compensation” arewere exempt from the $1$1.0 million limit including(including income from stock options, performance-based restricted stock and certain formula-driven compensation that meets the requirements of Section 162(m).) if, among other requirements, such compensation was subject to certain performance goals under a plan established by the Subcommittee and approved by our stockholders.

TheIn making executive compensation decisions in 2017 and prior years, the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee seeksought to structure Section 162(m) compliant incentive compensation for seniorcovered executives in a manner that complies with Section 162(m) in order to maximize the deductibility of such compensation. At the same time, the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee believed that it was important to retain discretion and maximum flexibility in designing appropriate executive compensation programs and establishing compensation levels that were in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, as there may bemight have been circumstances in which the Compensation Committee or Subcommittee determines,determined, in the exercise of its independent judgment and after its review of all relevant factors,to the extent consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, that it iswas in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders to provideapprove compensation to one or more executives that maywas not befully deductible. With respect to the compensation awarded to the NEOs during 2015,2017, all of the cash incentive awards, stock options and performance unit awards were designed to satisfy thethen-applicable requirements for deductible compensation.

In recognitionThe “performance-based compensation” exemption from Section 162(m) was repealed in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of the limitation imposed by Section 162(m), the Company’s employment agreement with Mr. Brolick requires2017, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that all amounts of base salarycompensation paid to our covered executives in excess of $1.0 million will not be deferred underdeductible unless the termscompensation qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of a special executive deferredNovember 2, 2017. The Company cannot give any assurance that any annual and long-term incentive awards outstanding after December 31, 2017 that the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee intended to satisfy the Section 162(m) “performance-based compensation” exemption requirements will in fact do so because of uncertainties regarding the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and related issued regulations, including the uncertain scope of the abovementioned transition relief. Our Compensation Committee and Subcommittee reserve the right to modify compensation plan. The terms of Mr. Brolick’s deferred compensation planthat was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) if the Compensation Committee or Subcommittee determines that such modifications are described inconsistent with the “2015Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” table below.

Company’s business needs.

40        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Accounting Costs Related to Long-Term Equity Awards.The Compensation Committee and Subcommittee also take into consideration the accounting costs associated with long-term equity incentive awards granted to senior executives and other eligible employees. Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), grants of stock options, performance units and other share-based awards result in an accounting charge for the Company. In designing the

46        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee and Subcommittee consider the accounting implications of equity awards, including the estimated cost for financial reporting purposes and the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Effective January 1, 2017, the Company introduced the Wendy’s International, LLC Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). We offer participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan to key managerial and highly compensated employees because their 401(k) plan contributions are limited under federal income tax rules applicable to highly compensated employees. Our Deferred Compensation Plan provides these key leaders with similar means of saving for retirement by contributing additional amounts on atax-deferred basis, subject to the provisions of the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan provisions also allow the Company to make discretionary contribution credits for a plan year; however, to date, we have elected not to make any such contributions. Although each NEO is eligible for participation, none of our NEOs participated in our Deferred Compensation Plan in 2017.

Consideration and Frequency of Annual StockholderSay-on-Pay Vote

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the Company provides stockholders with the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote to approve the compensation of the NEOs (i.e., an annual “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” vote)., as discussed under the caption “Proposal 3—Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation.” At the Company’s 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 85%96% of the votes cast on thesay-on-pay resolution were voted in favor of the compensation of theour named executive officers for fiscal 20142016, as disclosed in the Company’s 20152017 proxy statement. In July 2015,August 2017, the Compensation Committee considered those voting results and believes that our stockholders generally support our executive compensation program and therefore determined that no changes to the Company’s executive compensation program were warranted at that time. In December 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and approved certain modifications tothe existing framework for the executive compensation program for 2016, as2018, subject to the modifications described above under the caption “—Additional“Additional Compensation Decisions—Changes to the Executive Compensation Program for 2016.2018.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company also asked stockholders to vote on whether future advisorysay-on-pay votes on executive compensation should occur every year, every two years or every three years (i.e., a“say-on-frequency” vote). In February 2017, after careful consideration, our Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, determined that holding asay-on-pay vote every year is appropriate and allows our stockholders to express their collective views and provide timely, direct input on the Company’s executive compensation program and practices. At the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 91% of the votes cast on thesay-on-frequency resolution were voted in favor of holding annualsay-on-pay votes. We have conducted an annualsay-on-pay vote every year since 2011, consistent with the Board’s recommendations and the preferences expressed by our stockholders.

The Compensation Committee will continue to review the design of the executive compensation program in light of future “say-on-pay”say-on-pay votes, developments in executive compensation and the Company’spay-for-performance philosophy to ensure that the executive compensation program continues to serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        4147


20152017 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The 2015This 2017 Summary Compensation Table sets forth the salary, bonus, equitycash incentive awards, cashequity incentive awards and all other compensation that was earned by, or paid or awarded to, the following individuals (collectively, the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”)NEOs for 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013:2015:

 

  

The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer,Emil J. BrolickTodd A. Penegor;

 

 

  

The Company’s President and Chief Financial Officer,Todd A. PenegorGunther Plosch;

 

 

  

The Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers during 2015, other2017 (other than Messrs. BrolickPenegor and Penegor,Plosch) who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2015:2017:

 

 

 O  

Robert D. Wright, Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer;Officer and International;

 

 

 O  

R. Scott ToopKurt A. Kane, former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary;Chief Concept & Marketing Officer; and

 

 

 O  

Scott A. WeisbergE. J. Wunsch, Chief People Officer;Legal Officer and Secretary.

 

 

Two additional individuals who served as executive officers during 2015 but whose employment was terminated prior to the end of 2015:

O

Darrell G. van Ligten, former Senior Vice President – President, International; and

O

Craig S. Bahner, former Chief Marketing Officer.

NAMEAND        

PRINCIPAL POSITION        

  

 YEAR 

   

 SALARY 

($) (1)

   

 BONUS 

($)

   

STOCK

 AWARDS 

($) (2)

   

OPTION

 AWARDS 

($) (3)

   

NON-EQUITY

INCENTIVE PLAN

COMPENSATION

($) (4)

   

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION

($) (5)

   

TOTAL

($)

 

Emil J. Brolick

(CEO)

   2015     1,168,904          1,499,991     2,249,998     3,290,438     68,915     8,278,246  
   2014     1,137,500          1,799,992     2,699,998     1,435,000     91,708     7,164,198  
   2013     1,100,000          1,399,993     2,186,124     2,854,500     66,613     7,607,230  

Todd A. Penegor

(President and CFO)

   2015     679,863          399,993     599,998     965,672     30,200     2,675,726  
   2014     643,750          1,439,988     659,999     395,000     30,359     3,169,096  
   2013     360,577     250,000     1,649,981     723,375     725,000     87,857     3,796,790  

Robert D. Wright (6)

(EVP, COO)

   2015     490,479          359,992     539,999     638,345     30,200     2,059,015  
   2014     385,962     200,000     1,159,990     239,998     285,000     30,000     2,300,950  

R. Scott Toop (7)

(Former SVP, GC and Secretary)

   2015     491,822          263,986     395,998     560,805     30,200     1,742,811  
   2014     460,000          275,997     414,000     300,000     27,200     1,477,197  
   2013     440,000          259,993     405,993     520,000     144,225     1,770,210  

Scott A. Weisberg (8)

(CPO)

   2015     419,329          219,992     330,000     546,213     30,200     1,545,734  

Darrell G. van Ligten (9)

(Former SVP – President, Int’l)

   2015     188,630          1,081,701     708,024     119,136     1,690,379     3,787,870  

Craig S. Bahner (10)

(Former CMO)

   2015     123,630          835,063     807,112     137,026     469,139     2,371,970  
   2014     471,250          285,995     428,999     257,569     42,847     1,486,660  
   2013     431,058     15,000     259,993     405,993     530,000     27,000     1,669,043  

NAMEAND        

PRINCIPAL POSITION        

 YEAR 

 SALARY 

($)

 BONUS 

($)

STOCK

 AWARDS 

($) (1)

OPTION

 AWARDS 

($) (2)

NON-EQUITY

INCENTIVE PLAN

COMPENSATION

($) (3)

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION

($) (4)

TOTAL

($)

 

Todd A. Penegor

(President and CEO)

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

919,973

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,624,988

 

 

 

 

1,624,997

 

 

 

 

1,267,125

 

 

 

 

35,910

 

 

 

 

5,472,993

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

897,534

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,374,993

 

 

 

 

1,374,998

 

 

 

 

1,395,000

 

 

 

 

75,259

 

 

 

 

5,117,784

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

679,863

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

399,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

599,998

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

965,672

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,675,726

 

 

 

 

Gunther Plosch (5)

(CFO)

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

492,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

387,488

 

 

 

 

387,497

 

 

 

 

470,000

 

 

 

 

27,600

 

 

 

 

1,764,982

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

318,836

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

150,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

974,997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

374,998

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

323,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

122,483

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,265,264

 

 

 

 

Robert D. Wright

(EVP, COO and Int’l)

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

545,003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

487,486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

487,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

490,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,610

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,040,596

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

513,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

449,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

524,999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

566,835

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,085,520

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

490,479

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

359,992

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

539,999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

638,345

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,059,015

 

 

 

 

Kurt A. Kane (6)

(CCMO)

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

445,027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

599,983

 

 

 

 

349,998

 

 

 

 

405,000

 

 

 

 

30,400

 

 

 

 

1,830,408

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

431,315

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

324,987

 

 

 

 

325,000

 

 

 

 

424,778

 

 

 

 

30,200

 

 

 

 

1,536,279

 

 

 

E. J. Wunsch (7)

(CLO and Secretary)

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

406,384

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

274,983

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

274,997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

152,458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,483,822

 

 

 

 

 (1)

For 2015, the salaries received by Messrs. Brolick, Penegor, Wright, Toop and Weisberg reflect the impact of a 53rd week.

(2)

The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards made to the NEOs in the year shown, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding any estimates of forfeitures related to performance-based vesting conditions. See Note 1615 (Share-Based Compensation) to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the 20152017 Form10-K for the assumptions made in determining these values.

 

 

     

The amounts shown for 20152017 reflect, among other items, the target grant date fair values of performance unit awards granted to the NEOs in February 20152017 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan which awardsthat are subject to the Company’s achievement of performance goals established by the Subcommittee for the performance period

42        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


beginning December 29, 2014January 2, 2017 and ending December 31, 2017,29, 2019, as follows: $1,499,991 for Mr. Brolick; $399,993 forPenegor, $1,624,988; Mr. Penegor; $359,992 forPlosch, $387,488; Mr. Wright; $263,986 forWright, $487,486; Mr. Toop; $219,992 forKane, $349,988; and Mr. Weisberg; and $219,992 for Mr. van Ligten.Wunsch, $274,983. At maximum achievement levels, the grant date fair values of these awards would be as follows: $2,999,981 for Mr. Brolick; $799,987 forPenegor, $3,249,976; Mr. Penegor; $719,985 forPlosch $774,975; Mr. Wright; $527,973 forWright, $974,972; Mr. Toop; $439,983 forKane, $699,976; and Mr. Weisberg; and $439,983 for Mr. van Ligten.Wunsch, $549,966. For more information regarding the performance goals and potential payouts with respect to the 20152017 performance unit awards granted to the NEOs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2015—2017—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”Compensation” above.

 

 

 (3)

The 2017 amount shown for Mr. Kane also reflects a restricted stock unit award granted on August 11, 2017 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan to reinforce the retention and engagement of Mr. Kane in his current leadership role. The restricted stock units will vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to Mr. Kane’s continued employment with the Company on the vesting date. The restricted stock units include dividend equivalent rights, representing the right to receive additional restricted stock units in lieu of cash dividends paid with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying the award (if and when the award vests).

48        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


(2)

The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards made to the NEOs in the year shown, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 1615 (Share-Based Compensation) to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the 20152017 Form10-K for the assumptions made in determining these values. For more information regarding the stock options granted to the NEOs in 2015,2017, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2015—2017—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”Compensation” above.

 

 

 (4)(3)

The amounts shown represent the annual cash incentive payouts earned by the NEOs under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan for the year shown based on the Company’s achievement of annual performance goals established by the Subcommittee, as adjusted for individual performance. For more information regarding the performance goals and potential payouts with respect to the 20152017 cash incentive awards granted to the NEOs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2015—2017—Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.”Compensation” above.

 

 

 (5)(4)

The following table sets forth the details of the “All Other Compensation” paid to the NEOs for 2015.2017:

 

 

          NAME  

COMPANY
CONTRIBUTIONS

 TO 401(K) PLAN 

($) (a)

   

 AUTOMOBILE 
ALLOWANCE

($)

   

 USE OF
COMPANY 

AIRCRAFT

($) (b)

   

 PAYMENTS/ACCRUALS 

IN CONNECTIONWITH
TERMINATIONOF
EMPLOYMENT

($) (c)

   

 OTHER
PERQUISITES 

OR PERSONAL

BENEFITS

($) (d)

   

TOTAL

($)

 

Emil J. Brolick

   10,600     19,200     35,945          3,170     68,915  

Todd A. Penegor

   10,600     16,800               2,800     30,200  

Robert D. Wright

   10,600     16,800               2,800     30,200  

R. Scott Toop

   10,600     16,800               2,800     30,200  

Scott A. Weisberg

   10,600     16,800               2,800     30,200  

Darrell G. van Ligten

   10,600     7,754          1,671,136     889     1,690,379  

Craig S. Bahner

   10,600     4,846          453,693          469,139  

          NAME

 

COMPANY

CONTRIBUTIONS

     TO 401(K) PLAN     

($) (a)

 

     AUTOMOBILE     

ALLOWANCE

($)

 

RELOCATION

   REIMBURSEMENTS   

($) (b)

 

OTHER

PERQUISITES OR

  PERSONAL BENEFITS  

($) (c)

 

     TOTAL     

($)

 

 

Todd A. Penegor

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

19,200

 

 

 

        —

 

 

 

5,910

 

 

 

  35,910  

 

 

 

Gunther Plosch

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

16,800

 

 

 

        —

 

 

 

    —

 

 

 

  27,600  

 

 

 

Robert D. Wright

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

16,800

 

 

 

        —

 

 

 

3,010

 

 

 

  30,610  

 

 

 

Kurt A. Kane

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

16,800

 

 

 

        —

 

 

 

2,800

 

 

 

  30,400  

 

 

 

E. J. Wunsch

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

16,800

 

 

 

121,781

 

 

 

3,077

 

 

 

152,458  

 

 

 (a)

The amounts shown reflect matching contributions made by the Company to the NEOs’ respective 401(k) plan accounts.

 

 

 (b)

During 2015,The Company maintains a relocation policy that provides for the Company owned fractional interestsreimbursement of reasonable relocation expenses incurred by eligible employees who are hired, promoted or transferred at the Company’s request. Under the relocation policy, an employee’s taxable relocation expenses are generallytax-assisted, meaning that the reimbursed expenses are increased to offset the impact of applicable taxes. The relocation policy also provides eligible employees with financial, marketing and other assistance in corporate aircraft to enable its executives to safelyconnection with selling their existing home and efficiently travel for business purposes. The aircraft were operatedbuying a new home, including reimbursement of real estate commissions and customary closing costs. Under the relocation policy, eligible employees also may participate in a guaranteed home sale program administered by NetJets, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., pursuant to fractional program agreements. During 2015, none of the NEOs, other than Mr. Brolick, used the aircraft solely for personal purposes.third-party relocation firm, where a minimum sales price is determined by independent, licensed relocation appraisers.

 

 

     

The amount shown for Mr. Brolick reflects the aggregate incremental cost toWunsch includes (i) relocation assistance covered by the Company of personal flights bythrough its third-party provider under the Company’s relocation policy in connection with his relocation to Dublin, Ohio, which was provided to Mr. Brolick during 2015. Aggregate incremental cost is based on the variable operating costs toWunsch under his employment terms with the Company, associatedand (ii) a tax assistance payment of $1,700 made by the Company in accordance with such flights, including the hourly fees and fuel costs provided for in the fractional program agreements and other trip-related costs. Fixed costs, which do not change based on usageterms of the aircraft, such as monthly management fees and general maintenance costs, are excluded from this calculation.

On certain occasions, an executive’s spouse or other family members may accompany the executive on the aircraft when the aircraft is already going to a specific destination for a business purpose and has available seating. In those cases, the aggregate incremental cost to the Company is a de minimis amount.relocation policy.

 

 

 (c)

The amounts shown reflect the value of severance payments and benefits received or accrued during 2015 by Messrs. Bahner and van Ligten in connection with the termination of their employment. For more information regarding these payments and benefits, see “Employment Agreements” below.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        43


(d)

The amounts shown for Messrs. Brolick, Penegor, Wright, Toop, WeisbergKane and van Ligten reflectWunsch include the Company’s reimbursement of $2,800 for medical expenses incurred by the NEOsrespective NEO under the Company’s executive physical examination program. The Company adopted this program in 2013 to encourage executive officers to have routine medicalcheck-ups in an effort to maintain good health, identify health issues and drive productivity.

The amounts shown for Messrs. Penegor, Wright and Wunsch also include the Company’s reimbursement of commercial travel expenses for each individual’s respective spouse. On certain occasions, an executive officer’s spouse may accompany the executive on a trip for a specific business-related purpose. In those cases, the executive officer is reimbursed for their spouse’s commercial travel expenses only with the prior permission of our Chief Executive Officer.

The amount shown for Mr. BrolickPenegor also includes the Company’s payment of certain residential security costs whichthat were approved by the Compensation Committee following the Company’s review of potential security concerns related to Mr. Brolick’sPenegor’s service as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The amount shown for Mr. Penegor also includes a related tax assistance payment of $912 made by the Company.

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        49


(5)

Mr. Plosch was not a Named Executive Officer in 2015 and, therefore, his compensation information for that year has not been provided.

 

 

 (6)

Mr. WrightKane was not a named executive officerNamed Executive Officer in 20132015 and, therefore, his compensation information for that year is omitted.has not been provided.

 

 

 (7)

Mr. Toop retired from the Company on January 17, 2016 following the expiration of the employment term under his employment agreement.

(8)

Mr. WeisbergWunsch was not a named executive officerNamed Executive Officer in 20142015 or 20132016 and, therefore, his compensation information for those years has not been provided.

 

 

(9)

Mr. van Ligten was not a named executive officer in 2014 or 2013 and, therefore, his compensation information for those years has not been provided. Mr. van Ligten left the Company on June 8, 2015 and served as a consultant to the Company from June 9, 2015 to December 4, 2015. In connection with his departure from the Company, Mr. van Ligten received certain severance payments and benefits, as described below under the caption “Employment Agreements.” For 2015, the amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns include the incremental fair value associated with the accelerated vesting of outstanding performance unit awards and stock option awards held by Mr. van Ligten on his last day of employment, computed in accordance with FASB Topic 718.

(10)

Mr. Bahner left the Company on April 2, 2015 following the expiration of the employment term under his employment agreement. In connection with his departure from the Company, Mr. Bahner received certain severance payments and benefits, as described below under the caption “Employment Agreements.” For 2015, the amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns represent the incremental fair value associated with the accelerated vesting of outstanding performance unit awards and stock option awards held by Mr. Bahner on his last day of employment, computed in accordance with FASB Topic 718.

4450        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement


20152017 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table provides information concerning the annual cash incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards granted to the named executive officersNEOs in 2015.2017.

 

        NAME GRANT
DATE
 APPROVAL
DATE
 

 

ESTIMATED POSSIBLE
PAYOUTS UNDER  NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (1)

 

 

ESTIMATED FUTURE

PAYOUTS UNDER EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN  AWARDS (2)

 ALL  OTHER

STOCK
AWARDS:

NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK OR UNITS

(#) (3)
 ALL  OTHER
OPTION

AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
OPTIONS
(#) (4)
 EXERCISE OR
BASE  PRICE
OF OPTION

AWARDS
($/Sh)
 CLOSING
MARKET
PRICE ON
DATE OF

GRANT
($/Sh)
 GRANT
DATE FAIR
VALUEOF
STOCK AND
OPTION
AWARDS
($) (5)
         
         
   THRESHOLD
($)
 TARGET
($)
 MAXIMUM
($)
 THRESHOLD
(#)
 TARGET
(#)
 MAXIMUM
(#)
     

Emil J. Brolick

       862,500    1,725,000    3,450,000                 
   2/18/15    2/18/15          41,692    111,181    222,362            1,499,991 
   8/7/15    7/30/15                  989,271    9.86    9.82    2,249,998 

Todd A. Penegor

       253,125    506,250    1,012,500                 
   2/18/15    2/18/15          11,118    29,648    59,296            399,993 
   8/7/15    7/30/15                  263,805    9.86    9.82    599,998 

Robert D. Wright

       181,875    363,750    727,500                 
   2/18/15    2/18/15          10,006    26,683    53,366            359,992 
   8/7/15    7/30/15                  237,425    9.86    9.82    539,999 

R. Scott Toop

       183,750    367,500    735,000                 
   2/18/15    2/18/15          7,337    19,567    39,134            263,986 
   8/7/15    7/30/15                  174,111    9.86    9.82    395,998 

Scott A. Weisberg

       155,500    311,000    622,000                 
   2/18/15    2/18/15          6,114    16,306    32,612            219,992 
   8/7/15    7/30/15                  145,093    9.86    9.82    330,000 

Darrell G. van Ligten

       159,375    318,750    637,500                 
   2/18/15    2/18/15          6,114    16,306    32,612            219,992 
   6/8/15    12/11/14                  3,379    4.68    11.28    21,575 
   6/8/15    12/11/14                  80,372    7.92    11.28    259,907 
   6/8/15    12/11/14                  143,207    8.22    11.28    426,542 
   6/8/15    12/11/14                44,665          503,149 
   6/8/15    12/11/14                20,106          226,494 
   6/8/15    12/11/14                9,860          111,073 
   6/8/15    12/11/14                1,863          20,992 

Craig S. Bahner

       178,125    356,250    712,500                 
   4/2/15    12/11/14                  99,508    7.92    10.93    289,021 
   4/2/15    12/11/14                  195,035    8.22    10.93    518,091 
   4/2/15    12/11/14                42,192          460,098 
   4/2/15    12/11/14                22,633          246,817 
   4/2/15    12/11/14                11,751          128,147 
          NAME       

 

ESTIMATED POSSIBLE
PAYOUTS UNDER NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (1)

     

 

ESTIMATED FUTURE

PAYOUTS UNDER EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (2)

  

 

ALL OTHER

STOCK

AWARDS:

NUMBER OF

SHARESOF

STOCK

OR UNITS

(#) (3)

  

ALL OTHER
OPTION

AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
OPTIONS

(#) (4)

  

EXERCISE OR
BASE PRICE
OF  OPTION

AWARDS

($/Sh)

  

CLOSING
MARKET

PRICE ON

DATEOF

GRANT

($/Sh)

  

GRANT
DATE FAIR
VALUEOF
STOCK AND
OPTION
AWARDS

($) (5)

 
 

GRANT
DATE

 

  

APPROVAL
DATE

 

  

THRESHOLD
($)

 

  

TARGET
($)

 

  

MAXIMUM
($)

 

     

THRESHOLD
(#)

 

  

TARGET
(#)

 

  

MAXIMUM
(#)

 

      

  Todd A. Penegor

 

    

 

581,250

 

 

 

  

 

1,162,500

 

 

 

  

 

2,325,000

 

 

 

         
  

 

2/28/17

 

 

 

       

 

40,103

 

 

 

  

 

106,942

 

 

 

  

 

213,884

 

 

 

      

 

1,624,988

 

 

 

  

 

8/11/17

 

 

 

  

 

8/3/17

 

 

 

          

 

520,099

 

 

 

  

 

15.355

 

 

 

  

 

15.39

 

 

 

  

 

1,624,997

 

 

 

  Gunther Plosch

 

    

 

187,500

 

 

 

  

 

375,000

 

 

 

  

 

750,000

 

 

 

         
  

 

2/28/17

 

 

 

       

 

9,562

 

 

 

  

 

25,501

 

 

 

  

 

51,002

 

 

 

      

 

387,488

 

 

 

  

 

8/11/17

 

 

 

  

 

8/3/17

 

 

 

          

 

124,023

 

 

 

  

 

15.355

 

 

 

  

 

15.39

 

 

 

  

 

387,497

 

 

 

  Robert D. Wright

 

    

 

207,000

 

 

 

  

 

414,000

 

 

 

  

 

828,000

 

 

 

         
  

 

2/28/17

 

 

 

       

 

12,030

 

 

 

  

 

32,082

 

 

 

  

 

64,164

 

 

 

      

 

487,486

 

 

 

  

 

8/11/17

 

 

 

  

 

8/3/17

 

 

 

          

 

156,029

 

 

 

  

 

15.355

 

 

 

  

 

15.39

 

 

 

  

 

487,497

 

 

 

  Kurt A. Kane

 

    

 

168,750

 

 

 

  

 

337,500

 

 

 

  

 

675,000

 

 

 

         
  

 

2/28/17

 

 

 

       

 

8,637

 

 

 

  

 

23,033

 

 

 

  

 

46,066

 

 

 

      

 

349,988

 

 

 

  

 

8/11/17

 

 

 

  

 

8/3/17

 

 

 

          

 

112,021

 

 

 

  

 

15.355

 

 

 

  

 

15.39

 

 

 

  

 

349,998

 

 

 

  

 

8/11/17

 

 

 

  

 

8/3/17

 

 

 

         16,281      249,995 

  E. J. Wunsch

 

    

 

153,750

 

 

 

  

 

307,500

 

 

 

  

 

615,000

 

 

 

         
  

 

2/28/17

 

 

 

       

 

6,786

 

 

 

  

 

18,097

 

 

 

  

 

36,194

 

 

 

      

 

274,983

 

 

 

  

 

8/11/17

 

 

 

  

 

8/3/17

 

 

 

          

 

88,016

 

 

 

  

 

15.355

 

 

 

  

 

15.39

 

 

 

  

 

274,997

 

 

 

 

 (1)

Represents threshold, target and maximum payout levels based on 20152017 performance for the annual cash incentive awards granted to the NEOs under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan. For more information regarding the performance goals and potential payouts with respect to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2015—2017—Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.”Compensation” above. The actual amounts paid to the NEOs pursuant to such awards based on Company and individual performance during 20152017 were as follows: $3,290,438 for Mr. Brolick; $965,672 forPenegor, $1,267,125; Mr. Penegor; $638,345 forPlosch, $470,000; Mr. Wright; $560,805 forWright, $490,000; Mr. Toop; $546,213 forKane, $405,000; and Mr. Weisberg; $119,136 for Mr. van Ligten; and $137,026 for Mr. Bahner. Wunsch, $375,000.

Such amounts are included in the “Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “2015“2017 Summary Compensation Table.”Table” above.

 

 

 (2)

Represents threshold, target and maximum payout levels based on Company performance over a three-year period for performance unit awards granted to the NEOs under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan. For more information regarding the performance goals and potential payouts with respect to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2015—2017—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”Compensation” above. The performance units include dividend equivalent rights, representing the right to receive additional performance units in lieu of cash dividends paid with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying the award (if and when the award vests).

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        45


 (3)

For Mr. van Ligten,Kane, reflects a restricted stock unit award granted to Mr. Kane under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan on August 11, 2017 to reinforce the retention and engagement of Mr. Kane in his current leadership role. The restricted stock units will vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to Mr. Kane’s continued employment with the Company on the vesting date. The restricted stock units include dividend equivalent rights, representing the right to receive additional restricted stock units in lieu of cash dividends paid with respect to the shares of Common Stock received uponunderlying the accelerated vesting of outstanding performance unit awards held by Mr. van Ligten on June 8, 2015, his last day of employment. The Subcommittee approvedaward (if and when the vesting schedule applicable to Mr. van Ligten’s outstanding equity awards on December 11, 2014 as part of his overall severance terms.award vests).

 

For Mr. Bahner, reflects shares of Common Stock received upon the accelerated vesting of outstanding performance unit awards held by Mr. Bahner on April 2, 2015, his last day of employment. The Subcommittee approved the vesting schedule applicable to Mr. Bahner’s outstanding equity awards on December 11, 2014 as part of his overall severance terms.

 

 (4)

For Messrs. Brolick, Penegor, Wright, Toop and Weisberg, reflectsReflects stock options granted to the NEOs under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, each having an exercise price equal to the “fair market value” (i.e.(i.e., the average of the high and low per share sales price) of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the grant date and expiring ten years from the grant date, unless sooner exercised or forfeited. All of the stock

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        51


options vest and become exercisable in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date.

 

For Mr. van Ligten, reflects the accelerated vesting of outstanding stock option awards held by Mr. van Ligten on June 8, 2015, his last day of employment. The Subcommittee approved the vesting schedule applicable to Mr. van Ligten’s outstanding equity awards on December 11, 2014 as part of his overall severance terms.

For Mr. Bahner, reflects the accelerated vesting of outstanding stock option awards held by Mr. Bahner on April 2, 2015, his last day of employment. The Subcommittee approved the vesting schedule applicable to Mr. Bahner’s outstanding equity awards on December 11, 2014 as part of his overall severance terms.

 

 (5)

Represents the grant date fair value of equity awards granted to the NEOs, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding any estimates of forfeitures related to performance-based vesting conditions. The grant date fair value of the performance unit awards granted to Messrs. Penegor, Plosch, Wright, Kane and Wunsch on February 18, 201528, 2017 is based on achieving target levels of performance. See Note 1615 (Share-Based Compensation) to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the 20152017 Form10-K for the assumptions made in determining those values.

 

For Messrs. van Ligten and Bahner, also includes the incremental fair value associated with the accelerated vesting of outstanding performance unit awards and stock option awards held by Messrs. van Ligten and Bahner on their last day of employment, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

4652        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2015 2017YEAR-END

The following table provides information concerning the unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock unit and performance unit awards held by the named executive officersNEOs as of the end of 2015.2017.

 

  OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
        NAME 

NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS

(#)

EXERCISABLE

 

NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS

(#)

UNEXERCISABLE (1)

 

OPTION

EXERCISE

PRICE

($)

 

OPTION

EXPIRATION

DATE (2)

 

NUMBER OF

SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK  THAT
HAVE NOT

VESTED

(#)

 

MARKET

VALUE OF

SHARES OR

UNITS OF

STOCK THAT

HAVE NOT

VESTED

($) (3)

 

EQUITY INCENTIVE

PLAN AWARDS:

NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS OR

OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED

(#)

 

EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:

MARKET OR

PAYOUT VALUE

OF UNEARNED

SHARES, UNITS OR

OTHER RIGHTS

THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED

($) (3)

Emil J. Brolick

   540,540        4.82    9/12/21         
   833,333        4.68    7/2/22         
   535,814    267,908    7.92    8/9/23         
   294,985    589,970    8.22    8/11/24         
       989,271    9.86    8/7/25         
               374,198 (4)   4,030,112 
               193,482 (5)   2,083,801 
               227,202 (6)   2,446,966 

Todd A. Penegor

   43,720    21,860    5.91    6/3/23         
   145,435    72,718    7.92    8/9/23         
   100,018    200,036    8.22    8/11/24         
       263,805    9.86    8/7/25         
           77,017 (7)     829,473     
           119,400 (8)     1,285,938     
               101,562 (4)   1,093,823 
               47,295 (5)   509,367 
               60,586 (6)   652,511 

Robert D. Wright

   36,370    72,740    8.22    8/11/24         
       237,425    9.86    8/7/25         
           119,400 (8)     1,285,938     
               17,198 (5)   185,222 
               54,526 (6)   587,245 

R. Scott Toop

   140,000        5.35    1/17/22         
   166,666        4.68    7/2/22         
   99,508    49,754    7.92    8/9/23         
   62,738    125,478    8.22    8/11/24         
       174,111    9.86    8/7/25         
               69,490 (4)   748,407 
               29,667 (5)   319,514 
               39,984 (6)   430,628 

Scott A. Weisberg

   80,372    40,186    7.92    8/9/23         
   50,009    100,018    8.22    8/11/24         
       145,093    9.86    8/7/25         
               56,128 (4)   604,499 
               23,647 (5)   254,678 
               33,320 (6)   358,856 

Darrell G. van Ligten

                

Craig S. Bahner

                
 

 

 

 

 

OPTION AWARDS

 

 

 

 

   

 

STOCK AWARDS

 

 

 

        NAME  




NUMBEROF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS

(#)

EXERCISABLE

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

  




NUMBEROF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS

(#)

UNEXERCISABLE (1)

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

  

OPTION

EXERCISE

PRICE

($)

 

 

 

 

  

OPTION

 EXPIRATION 

DATE (2)

 

 

 

   



NUMBER OF

SHARESOR

UNITSOF

STOCK THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED

(#)

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

  



MARKET

VALUEOF

SHARESOR

UNITSOF

STOCK

THAT
HAVENOT
VESTED

($) (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

  





EQUITY INCENTIVE

PLAN AWARDS:

NUMBEROF
UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS
OR OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE

NOT VESTED

(#)

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:

MARKETOR

PAYOUT VALUE

OF UNEARNED

SHARES, UNITS

  OR OTHER RIGHTS  

THAT HAVE

NOT VESTED

($) (3)

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Todd A. Penegor

  65,580     —           5.9050   6/3/23          
 

 

 

 

218,153  

 

 

  —           7.9225   8/9/23          
 

 

 

 

300,054  

 

 

  —           8.2225   8/11/24          
 

 

 

 

175,870  

 

 

  87,935           9.8575   8/7/25          
 

 

 

 

216,542  

 

 

  433,084           10.0875   8/12/26          
 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

  520,099           15.3550   8/11/27          
      

 

 

 

62,212 (7)  

 

 

  1,021,521   
        

 

 

 

63,134 (4)  

 

 

  1,036,660       
        

 

 

 

291,550 (5)  

 

 

  4,787,251       
        

 

 

 

 

217,924 (6)  

 

 

 

 

  

 

3,578,312      

 

 

 

 

 

  Gunther Plosch

  59,056     118,114           10.0875   8/12/26          
 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

  124,023           15.3550   8/11/27          
      

 

 

 

90,858 (8)  

 

 

  1,491,888   
        

 

 

 

 

51,964 (6)  

 

 

 

 

  

 

853,249      

 

 

 

 

 

  Robert D. Wright

  109,110     —           8.2225   8/11/24          
 

 

 

 

158,283  

 

 

  79,142           9.8575   8/7/25          
 

 

 

 

82,679  

 

 

  165,360           10.0875   8/12/26          
 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

  156,029           15.3550   8/11/27          
      

 

 

 

62,212 (7)  

 

 

  1,021,521   
        

 

 

 

56,820 (4)  

 

 

  932,984       
        

 

 

 

95,414 (5)  

 

 

  1,566,698       
        

 

 

 

 

65,376 (6)  

 

 

 

 

  

 

1,073,474      

 

 

 

 

 

  Kurt A. Kane

  102,590     51,296           9.8575   8/7/25          
 

 

 

 

51,182  

 

 

  102,366           10.0875   8/12/26          
 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

  112,021           15.3550   8/11/27          
      

 

 

 

25,607 (9)  

 

 

  420,467   
      

 

 

 

16,426 (10)

 

 

  269,715   
        

 

 

 

68,906 (5)  

 

 

  1,131,437       
        

 

 

 

 

46,934 (6)  

 

 

 

 

  

 

770,656      

 

 

 

 

 

  E. J. Wunsch

  —     88,016           15.3550   8/11/27          
      

 

 

 

47,514 (11)

 

 

  780,180   
        

 

 

 

 

36,876 (6)  

 

 

 

 

  

 

605,504      

 

 

 

 

 (1)

All stock options vest and become exercisable in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date.

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        47


 (2)

All stock options expire ten years from the grant date, unless sooner exercised or forfeited.

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        53


 (3)

Based on $10.77$16.42 per share, which was the per share closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2015,29, 2017, the last trading day of 2015.2017.

 

 

 (4)

Represents payout levels based on achieving maximum performance levels over a two and one-half-year period (July 1, 2013 through January 3, 2016) for performance unit awards granted on August 9, 2013 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2015. Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of two performance goals based on adjusted earnings per share and restaurant openings and remodels during the performance period. For more information regarding the performance goals and potential payouts with respect to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders filed with the SEC on April 11, 2014. The performance unit awards vested on February 25, 2016 following the Subcommittee’s determination of the Company’s level of achievement of the performance goals. The number of shares of Common Stock received by Messrs. Brolick, Penegor, Toop and Weisberg upon the vesting of the awards was as follows: 306,841 shares for Mr. Brolick; 83,280 shares for Mr. Penegor; 56,981 shares for Mr. Toop; and 46,024 shares for Mr. Weisberg.

(5)

Represents payout levels based on achieving target performance levels over a three-year period (December 30, 2013 through January 1, 2017) for performance unit awards granted on February 20, 2014 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2015. Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of a performance goal based on adjusted earnings per share during the performance period. For more information regarding the performance goal and potential payouts with respect to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2014—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders filed with the SEC on April 17, 2015.

(6)

Represents payout levels based on achieving maximum performance levels over a three-year period (December 29, 2014 through December 31, 2017) for performance unit awards granted on February 18, 2015 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2015.2017. Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of two performance goals based on adjusted earnings per share and relative total stockholder return during the performance period. For more information regarding the performance goals and potential payouts with respect to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2015—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”Compensation” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders filed with the SEC on April 11, 2016.

 

 

 (7)(5)

Reflects unvested restricted stock unitsRepresents payout levels based on achieving maximum performance levels over a three-year period (January 4, 2016 through December 30, 2018) for performance unit awards granted to Mr. Penegor on June 3, 2013February 25, 2016 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2015. The restricted stock units vest on June 3, 2016,2017. Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to Mr. Penegor’s continued employmentthe Company’s achievement of two performance goals based on adjusted earnings per share and relative total stockholder return during the vesting date.performance period. For more information regarding the performance goals and potential payouts with respect to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2016—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders filed with the SEC on April 11, 2017.

 

 

 (8)(6)

Represents payout levels based on achieving target performance levels over a three-year period (January 2, 2017 through December 29, 2019) for performance unit awards granted on February 28, 2017 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2017. Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of a performance goal based on adjusted earnings per share during the performance period. For more information regarding the performance goal and potential payouts with respect to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions for 2017—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation” above.

(7)

Reflects unvested restricted stock units granted to Messrs. Penegor and Wright on December 17, 2014 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan.Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2017. The restricted stock units vest in two equal installments on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date. The first installment of each individual’s respective award (including the related dividend equivalent units) vested in full on December 17, 2017.

 

(8)

Reflects unvested restricted stock units granted to Mr. Plosch on May 2, 2016 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2017. The restricted stock units vest on May 2, 2019, subject to Mr. Plosch’s continued employment on the vesting date.

(9)

Reflects unvested restricted stock units granted to Mr. Kane on May 4, 2015 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2017. The restricted stock units vest on May 4, 2018, subject to Mr. Kane’s continued employment on the vesting date.

(10)

Reflects unvested restricted stock units granted to Mr. Kane on August 11, 2017 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2017, to reinforce the retention and engagement of Mr. Kane in his current leadership role. The restricted stock units vest on August 11, 2020, subject to Mr. Kane’s continued employment on the vesting date.

(11)

Reflects unvested restricted stock units granted to Mr. Wunsch on October 3, 2016 under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, plus dividends accrued thereon as of the end of 2017. The restricted stock units vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to Mr. Wunsch’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date. The first installment (including the related dividend equivalent units) vested in full on October 3, 2017.

 

4854        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement


OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING 20152017

The following table provides information for 20152017 concerning the exercise of stock options and vesting of stock awards granted to the named executive officersNEOs in prior years.

 

  OPTION AWARDS      STOCK AWARDS 
       NAME 

NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON  EXERCISE

(#)

   

VALUE REALIZED

ON EXERCISE

($) (1)

      

NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON  VESTING

(#)

  

VALUE REALIZED

ON VESTING

($) (2)

 

Emil J. Brolick

��

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

  

 

     

 

419,155 

 

(3) 

 

  

 

4,306,818

 

  

 

Todd A. Penegor

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

  

 

     75,389 (4)   

 

867,916

 

  

 

Robert D. Wright

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

  

 

     

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

R. Scott Toop

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

  

 

     

 

83,827 

 

(3) 

 

  

 

861,322

 

  

 

Scott A. Weisberg

 

  

 

138,888

 

  

 

   

 

825,689

 

  

 

     

 

69,856 

 

(3) 

 

  

 

717,770

 

  

 

Darrell G. van Ligten (5)

 

  

 

756,321

 

  

 

   

 

4,165,296

 

  

 

     

 

81,304 

 

  

 

  

 

915,751

 

  

 

Craig S. Bahner (6)

 

  

 

544,297

 

  

 

   

 

2,394,485

 

  

 

     

 

80,801 

 

  

 

  

 

880,731

 

  

 

OPTION AWARDSSTOCK AWARDS
        NAME

NUMBEROF SHARES
ACQUIREDON EXERCISE

(#)

VALUE REALIZED

ON EXERCISE

($) (1)

NUMBEROF SHARES
ACQUIREDON VESTING

(#)

VALUE REALIZED

ON VESTING

($) (2)

Todd A. Penegor

115,417 (3)

1,705,238

Gunther Plosch

Robert D. Wright

81,557 (3)

1,235,769

Kurt A. Kane

E. J. Wunsch

23,650 (4)

363,146

 

 (1)

Based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the market price of our Common Stock at the time of exercise.

 

 

 (2)

Based on the average of the high and low per share sales price of our Common Stock on the applicable vesting date.

 

 

 (3)

RepresentsThis number includes the number of shares of Common Stock earned with respect to performance unit awards granted on July 2, 2012February 20, 2014 for the three-year performance period that began on July 2, 2012December 30, 2013 and ended on June 28, 2015.January 1, 2017. The performance unit awards vested on July 30, 2015February 28, 2017 following the Subcommittee’s determination of the Company’s level of achievement of athe adjusted earnings per share performance goal basedgoal. Regarding such awards, the number of shares of Common Stock actually received by each individual was reduced by the withholding of shares (18,453 shares withheld by Mr. Penegor and 6,478 shares by Mr. Wright) to pay the income taxes associated with the value realized upon vesting.

This number also includes the number of shares of Common Stock received on relative stockholder return.December 17, 2017 from the pro rata vesting of each individual’s respective restricted stock unit award granted on December 17, 2014. Regarding such awards, the number of shares of Common Stock actually received by each individual was reduced by the withholding of 30,804 shares, respectively, to pay the income taxes associated with the value realized upon vesting.

 

 

 (4)

Representsone-third of the restricted stock units (plus dividends accrued thereon) granted on October 3, 2016 and which vested on October 3, 2017. The number of shares of Common Stock actually received on June 3, 2015 fromby Mr. Wunsch was reduced by the pro rata vestingwithholding of a restricted stock unit award granted on June 3, 2013.7,770 shares to pay the income taxes associated with the value realized upon vesting.

 

(5)

Mr. van Ligten left the Company on June 8, 2015. In connection with his departure: (i) all outstanding stock options held by Mr. van Ligten vested in full; (ii) the expiration date of all outstanding stock options held by Mr. van Ligten was accelerated to June 8, 2016 (one year following his departure); (iii) all outstanding performance units held by Mr. van Ligten vested on a pro rata basis on the assumed achievement of target performance; and (iv) all outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. van Ligten vested on a pro rata basis.

(6)

Mr. Bahner left the Company on April 2, 2015 following the expiration of the employment term under his employment agreement. In connection with his departure: (i) all outstanding stock options held by Mr. Bahner vested in full; (ii) the expiration date of all outstanding stock options held by Mr. Bahner was accelerated to April 2, 2016 (one year following his departure); and (iii) all outstanding performance units held by Mr. Bahner vested on a pro rata basis based on the assumed achievement of target performance.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        4955


2015 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Brolick is required to defer all amounts of base salary in excess of $1,000,000 under a special executive deferred compensation plan established by the Company. The following table provides information concerning Mr. Brolick’s account under the deferred compensation plan for 2015. Except for Mr. Brolick’s deferred compensation plan, the Company did not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation or defined contribution plans for the named executive officers during 2015.

         NAME  

EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FISCAL  YEAR

($)

  

REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FISCAL  YEAR

($)

   

AGGREGATE
EARNINGS
IN LAST FISCAL  YEAR

($)

  

AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/

DISTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

($)

   

AGGREGATE
BALANCE
AT LAST FISCAL  YEAR

($)

 

Emil J. Brolick

 

   

 

168,904 

 

(1) 

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

13,580 

 

(2) 

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

537,213 

 

(3) 

 

Todd A. Penegor

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

Robert D. Wright

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

R. Scott Toop

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

Scott A. Weisberg

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

Darrell G. van Ligten

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

Craig S. Bahner

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

(1)

The amount shown is reported as compensation to Mr. Brolick for 2015 and is included in the “Salary” column of the 2015 Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

Because Mr. Brolick’s deferred compensation plan does not provide for “above-market” or “preferential” earnings on his account, the amount shown is not reported in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table.

(3)

Of the amount shown: (i) $100,000 was previously reported as compensation to Mr. Brolick for 2012; (ii) $100,000 was previously reported as compensation to Mr. Brolick for 2013; and (iii) $137,500 was previously reported as compensation to Mr. Brolick for 2014. Such amounts were included in the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.

All amounts deferred by Mr. Brolick under the deferred compensation plan will: (i) be vested and nonforfeitable at all times; (ii) be distributed to Mr. Brolick in a single lump-sum payment on the first day of the seventh month following his retirement, subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and (iii) bear interest (compounded quarterly) at a rate equal to the three-month LIBOR, plus 500 basis points, not to exceed 120% of the applicable U.S. federal long-term rate. For 2015, interest was credited to Mr. Brolick’s account on a quarterly basis using the following interest rates: 3.17% for the first quarter; 2.93% for the second quarter; 3.52% for the third quarter; and 3.06% for the fourth quarter.

50        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTSARRANGEMENTS AND

A summary of the key terms and provisions of the named executive officers’ employment agreements with the Company is set forth below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the employment agreements, copies of which have been filed with the SEC. The severance and termination provisions included in the employment agreements for Messrs. Brolick, Penegor, Wright and Weisberg are described below under the caption “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

EMIL J. BROLICK

Effective September 12, 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Brolick, as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement provided that Mr. Brolick was to be appointed to the Board of Directors as of his date of hire, and the Company will cause Mr. Brolick to be nominated for re-election to the Board each year during his term of employment. The employment agreement stated that the term of Mr. Brolick’s employment would run through September 12, 2014, provided that the parties could agree to a one-year extension of the term on mutually satisfactory terms. On June 2, 2014, the Company and Mr. Brolick entered into an amendment to the employment agreement which extended the term of Mr. Brolick’s employment to September 12, 2015, subject to automatic renewal for additional one-year periods unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 90 days prior to the expiration of thethen-current term. Under the employment agreement, as amended, Mr. Brolick’s annual base salary was set at $1,150,000, with all amounts in excess of $1,000,000 to be deferred under a special executive deferred compensation plan. Mr. Brolick’s annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 150% of his base salary and his annual maximum cash incentive opportunity was set at 300% of his base salary. The employment agreement, as amended, provides that Mr. Brolick will be eligible to receive equity awards under the Company’s annual long-term equity incentive award program in effect for other senior executives, with an aggregate guideline award value of $3,000,000. The actual grant date value of Mr. Brolick’s equity awards may be above or below the $3,000,000 guideline, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion after taking into account the Company’s and Mr. Brolick’s performance and other relevant factors.

In October 2015, the Company announced that Mr. Brolick planned to retire from management duties with the Company in May 2016, and that Mr. Penegor was expected to succeed Mr. Brolick in the President and Chief Executive Officer role after a transition period beginning in the first quarter of 2016. As part of the succession plan, Mr. Penegor assumed the role of President effective January 4, 2016. Mr. Brolick is expected to continue as Chief Executive Officer until the transition of Mr. Penegor’s duties as Chief Financial Officer has occurred, which is expected by May 2016.

TODD A. PENEGOR

The Company and Mr. Penegor entered into an employment letter dated May 8, 2013 pursuant to which Mr. Penegor joined the Company on June 3, 2013 and assumed the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective September 1, 2013. Mr. Penegor was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and International effective December 17, 2014. Under the employment letter, Mr. Penegor’s initial annual base salary was set at $625,000 and his annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 75% of his base salary. The employment letter also provides that Mr. Penegor will be eligible to receive equity awards under the Company’s annual long-term incentive award program in effect for other senior executives.

Effective January 4, 2016, Mr. Penegor was promoted to President and Chief Financial Officer as part of the Company’s succession plan. Mr. Penegor is expected to succeed Mr. Brolick as Chief Executive Officer once the transition of Mr. Penegor’s duties as Chief Financial Officer has occurred, which is expected to occur by May 2016. Upon assuming the role of President, Mr. Penegor’s annual base salary was set at $900,000, his annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 125% of his base salary and his long-term equity incentive compensation award for 2016 will be within a range of $2,200,000 to $3,500,000, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion after taking into account the Company’s and Mr. Penegor’s performance and other relevant factors.

ROBERT D. WRIGHT

The Company and Mr. Wright entered into an employment letter dated November 1, 2013 pursuant to which Mr. Wright joined the Company on December 2, 2013 and assumed the position of Chief Operations Officer effective March 10, 2014. Mr. Wright was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer effective December 17, 2014. Under the employment letter, Mr. Wright’s initial base salary was set at $375,000 (currently set at $485,000) and his annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 75% of his base salary. The employment letter also provides that Mr. Wright will be eligible to receive equity awards under the Company’s annual long-term incentive award program in effect for other senior executives.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        51


SCOTT A. WEISBERG

Effective April 30, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Weisberg, as the Company’s Chief People Officer. The employment agreement stated that the term of Mr. Weisberg’s employment would run through April 30, 2014, subject to automatic renewal for additional one-year periods unless either party provides a notice of non-renewal at least 120 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Weisberg’s initial annual base salary was set at $375,000 (currently set at $415,000) and his annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 75% of his base salary. The employment agreement also provides that Mr. Weisberg will be eligible to receive equity awards under the Company’s annual long-term incentive award program in effect for other senior executives.

R. SCOTT TOOP

Effective January 17, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Toop, as the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. The employment agreement stated that the term of Mr. Toop’s employment would run through January 17, 2014, subject to automatic renewal for additional one-year periods unless either party gave notice of non-renewal at least 120 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Toop’s initial annual base salary was set at $425,000 (set at $490,000 at the time of his retirement from the Company) and his annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 75% of his base salary. The employment agreement also provided that Mr. Toop would be eligible to receive equity awards under the Company’s annual long-term incentive award program in effect for other senior executives.

Mr. Toop retired from the Company on January 17, 2016 following the expiration of the employment term under his employment agreement. In connection with his retirement, Mr. Toop received (or became entitled to receive) the following payments and benefits:

His full annual cash incentive award for 2015, based on actual Company performance, payable in a lump sum on the date annual incentives are paid to other executives ($560,805);

All outstanding stock options held by Mr. Toop vested pro rata ($72,188) and remain exercisable for a period of one year following his retirement;

Outstanding performance units awarded to Mr. Toop in 2013 vested on February 25, 2016 based on actual performance through the end of the performance period ($535,621); and

Outstanding performance units awarded to Mr. Toop in 2014 and 2015 will vest on a pro rata basis based on actual performance through the end of the applicable performance period.

The value shown above with respect to the vesting of Mr. Toop’s stock options was estimated assuming the immediate exercise and sale of all vested stock options, based on the closing price of our Common Stock on January 15, 2016 ($9.63). The value shown above with respect to the vesting of Mr. Toop’s 2013 performance units was estimated assuming the immediate sale of all vested performance units, based on the closing price of our Common Stock on February 25, 2016 ($9.40).

Prior to receiving any of the severance payments and benefits described above, Mr. Toop was required to sign a general release and covenant not to sue in favor of the Company. In addition, Mr. Toop remains subject to certain(i) non-compete and non-solicitation covenants for 12 months following his retirement and (ii) confidentiality andnon-disparagement covenants for four years following his retirement.

DARRELL G.VAN LIGTEN

Effective February 2, 2009, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. van Ligten, as the Company’s Senior Vice President – Strategic Development. The employment agreement stated that the term of Mr. van Ligten’s employment would run through February 2, 2011, subject to automatic renewal for additional one-year periods unless either party gave notice of non-renewal at least 120 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. van Ligten’s initial annual base salary was set at $325,000 (set at $425,000 at the time of his departure from the Company) and his annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 75% of his base salary. On March 23, 2012, the Company and Mr. van Ligten entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which Mr. van Ligten agreed to remain employed by the Company following the relocation of his position from Atlanta, Georgia to the Company’s headquarters in Dublin, Ohio, notwithstanding the occurrence of certain “triggering events” under the terms of his employment agreement. Effective May 23, 2013, Mr. van Ligten was appointed Senior Vice President – President, International.

52        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Mr. van Ligten left the Company on June 8, 2015. In connection with his departure, Mr. van Ligten received (or became entitled to receive) the following payments and benefits:

A cash payment equal to the sum of his then-current base salary and actual cash incentive award paid for 2014, payable in semi-monthly installments for a period of 12 months ($662,000);

A cash payment equal to his then-current base salary for an additional period of 12 months, payable in semi-monthly installments commencing 12 months after termination, offset by any compensation earned from subsequent employment ($425,000);

A lump sum cash payment of $27,500;

A pro rata portion of his annual cash incentive award for 2015, based on actual Company performance, payable in a lump sum on the date annual incentives are paid to other executives ($119,136);

All outstanding stock options held by Mr. van Ligten vested in full ($1,725,971) and remain exercisable for a period of one year following his termination;

All outstanding performance units held by Mr. van Ligten vested on a pro rata basis based on the assumed achievement of target performance ($910,725); and

All outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. van Ligten vested on a pro rata basis ($902).

The Company and Mr. van Ligten entered into a consulting agreement dated June 9, 2015 pursuant to which Mr. van Ligten provided consulting services to the Company through December 4, 2015. In consideration for his services, Mr. van Ligten received a monthly consulting fee of $70,000 ($437,500).

The values shown above with respect to the vesting of Mr. van Ligten’s equity awards were estimated assuming the immediate exercise and sale of all vested stock options and the immediate sale of all vested performance units and restricted stock units, in each case based on the closing price of our Common Stock on June 8, 2015 ($11.28).

Prior to receiving any of the severance payments and benefits described above, Mr. van Ligten was required to sign a general release and covenant not to sue in favor of the Company. In addition, Mr. van Ligten remains subject to certain (i) non-compete and non-solicitation covenants for 12 months following his departure and (ii) confidentiality andnon-disparagement covenants for four years following his departure.

CRAIG S. BAHNER

Effective April 2, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Bahner, as the Company’s Chief Marketing Officer. The employment agreement provided that the term of Mr. Bahner’s employment would run through April 2, 2014, subject to automatic renewal for additional one-year periods unless either party gave notice ofnon-renewal at least 120 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Bahner’s initial annual base salary was set at $425,000 (set at $475,000 at the time of his departure from the Company) and his annual target cash incentive opportunity was set at 75% of his base salary. The employment agreement also provided that Mr. Bahner would be eligible to receive equity awards under the Company’s annuallong-term incentive award program in effect for other senior executives.

Mr. Bahner left the Company on April 2, 2015 following the expiration of the employment term under his employment agreement. In connection with his departure, Mr. Bahner received the following payments and benefits:

A cash payment equal to eight months of his then-current base salary, payable in semi-monthly installments ($316,667);

A pro rata portion of his annual cash incentive award for 2015, based on actual Company performance, payable in a lump sum on the date annual incentives are paid to other executives ($137,026);

All outstanding stock options held by Mr. Bahner vested in full ($827,328) and remain exercisable for a period of one year following his termination; and

All outstanding performance units held by Mr. Bahner vested on a pro rata basis based on the assumed achievement of target performance ($883,155).

The values shown above with respect to the vesting of Mr. Bahner’s equity awards were estimated assuming the immediate exercise and sale of all vested stock options and the immediate sale of all vested performance units, in each case based on the closing price of our Common Stock on April 2, 2015 ($10.93).

Prior to receiving any of the severance payments and benefits described above, Mr. Bahner was required to sign a general release and covenant not to sue in favor of the Company. In addition, Mr. Bahner was subject to certainnon-compete and non-solicitation covenants for eight months following his departure, and he remains subject to certain confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants for four years following his departure.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        53


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Following careful consideration and consultation with its executive compensation advisors, beginning in 2013, the Company adopted a philosophy to discontinue the use of formal employment agreements. The Company believes this practice is a responsible approach aligned with stockholder interests and best practice. Employment arrangements for our NEOs are governed by the terms of their individual employment offers, as well as anExecutive Severance Pay Policy adopted by the Compensation Committee in December 2015 (the “Executive Severance Policy”). The key provisions related to termination of employment for the NEOs are summarized in the tables below.

The named executive officers are parties to employment agreements with the Company that provide for certain severance payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination event. The named executive officersNEOs also have received equity awards under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, which provides for the accelerated vesting of certain awards in connection with a qualifying termination event. Awards granted under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan are subject to “double-trigger” vesting requirements in connection with a “change in control” of the Company. This means that, in order for an outstanding award to be accelerated and become vested, a “change in control” must occur and the participant must be terminated without “cause” or for “good reason” following the change in control.

The Company considers these limited severance and change in control benefits to be an important part of the executive compensation program and consistent with competitive market practice. The Company believes that providing appropriate severance benefits helps to attract and retain highly-qualifiedhighly qualified executives by mitigating the risks associated with leaving a previous employer and accepting a new position with the Company, and by providing income continuity following an unexpected termination. These arrangements also allow the Company to protect its interests through corresponding confidentiality,non-compete and other restrictive covenants in the event of an executive’s termination.

A summary of the key severance provisions in effect as of the end of 20152017 for Messrs. Brolick, Penegor, Plosch, Wright, Kane and WeisbergWunsch is set forth below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of their respectivethe employment agreementsarrangement documents for the NEOs, theExecutive Severance Policy and the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, copies of which have been filed with the SEC. The actual severance payments and benefits received by Messrs. Toop, van Ligten and Bahner in connection with their departure from the Company are described above under the caption “Employment Agreements.”

Employment Agreements – Key Severance ProvisionsEMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS—KEY SEVERANCE PROVISIONS

 

EMIL J. BROLICK

Termination event:

•   Termination due to “retirement” (i.e., termination for any reason other than death or for “cause”)

Severance payments:

•   A pro rata portion of Mr. Brolick’s annual cash incentive award for 2015, based on actual Company performance, payable in a lump sum on the date annual incentives are paid to other executives ($3,290,438)

Treatment of equity awards:

•   Continued vesting through the end of the applicable vesting periods of all equity awards outstanding on the retirement date as if Mr. Brolick had not experienced a termination of employment (with immediate vesting of such awards in the event a “change of control” occurs following his termination)

TODD A. PENEGORAND ROBERT D. WRIGHT

 

Termination event:

 

 

Termination without “cause”“cause.”

Severance payments:

 

A cash payment equal to the sum of the executive’s then-current base salary and actual cash incentive award paid for 2014,2016, payable in biweekly installments for a period of 12 months (Mr. Penegor: $1,070,000; andPenegor, $2,325,000; Mr. Wright: $770,000)Wright, $1,118,835).

 

A cash payment equal to the executive’s then-current base salary for an additional period of 12 months, payable in biweekly installments commencing 12 months after termination, offset by any compensation earned from subsequent employment (Mr. Penegor: $675,000; andPenegor, $930,000; Mr. Wright: $485,000)Wright, $552,000).

 

A lump sum cash payment of $30,000$30,000.

 

A pro rata portion of the executive’s annual cash incentive award for 2015,2017, based on actual Company performance, payable in a lump sum on the date annual incentives are paid to other executives (Mr. Penegor: $965,672; andPenegor, $1,267,125; Mr. Wright: $638,345)Wright, $490,000).

Treatment of equity awards:

 

In the event of a termination without “cause,” all outstanding stock options and restricted stock units will vest pro rata (on a monthly basis) through the date of termination (Mr. Penegor: $1,648,775; andPenegor, $2,858,389; Mr. Wright: $535,076)

Wright, $1,957,465).

 

54        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


SGCOTTUNTHER PLOSCH, KURT A. KANEAND E. J. WEISBERGUNSCH

 

Termination event:

 

 

Termination without “cause” or termination due to a “triggering event”change in control.

Severance payments:

 

   A

If termination without “cause” occurs, a cash payment equal to the executive’s then-current base salary, payable in biweekly installments for a period of 18 months (Mr. Plosch, $750,000; Mr. Kane, $675,000; Mr. Wunsch, $615,000).

56        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


If termination without “cause” occurs within 12 months following a change in control, a cash payment equal to the sum of Mr. Weisberg’sthe executive’s then-current base salary and actualtarget annual cash incentive award paid for 2014,2017, payable in semi-monthlybiweekly installments for a salary continuation period of 1218 months ($656,000)(Mr. Plosch, $1,125,000; Mr. Kane, $1,012,500; Mr. Wunsch, $922,500).

 

   A cash payment equal to Mr. Weisberg’s then-current base salary for an additional period of 12 months, payable in semi-annual installments commencing 12 months after termination, offset by any compensation earned from subsequent employment ($415,000)

 

•   A lump sum cash payment of $27,500

•   AIn either case, a pro rata portion of Mr. Weisberg’sthe executive’s annual cash incentive award for 2015,2017, based on actual Company performance, payable in a lump sum on the date annual incentives are paid to other executives ($546,213)(Mr. Plosch, $470,000; Mr. Kane, $405,000; Mr. Wunsch, $375,000).

Treatment of equity awards:

 

•   In the event of a termination due to disability,without “cause”:

Continued vesting of all outstanding stock options during the18-month salary continuation period. Any unvested stock options remaining outstanding as of the conclusion of the18-month salary continuation period will fully vest ($501,623)be forfeited.

Termination at or following expiration of employment term:

 

•   InAccelerated vesting, as of the eventtermination date, of a termination byoutstanding restricted stock units that would have vested had the Company atexecutive continued in active employment through the expirationend of the18-month salary continuation period. All other unvested restricted stock units will be forfeited (Mr. Plosch, $1,491,888; Mr. Weisberg’s employment term,Kane, $457,927; Mr. Weisberg would receive (i) continuationWunsch, $390,090).

Vesting of his then-current base salary for eight months, payable in semi-monthly installments, and (ii)outstanding performance units on a pro rata portionbasis, based on the number of his annual cash incentive award formonths worked prior to the fiscal year in whichexecutive’s termination date. Vesting will occur at the termination occurs,conclusion of the applicable performance period(s), based on actual Company performance payablefor the entire performance period(s) (Mr. Plosch, $134,082; Mr. Kane, $492,861; Mr. Wunsch, $95,151).

If termination without “cause” occurs within 12 months following a change in a lump sumcontrol:

Accelerated, full vesting of outstanding stock options as of the termination date (Mr. Plosch, $880,041; Mr. Kane, $1,104,165; Mr. Wunsch, $93,737).

Accelerated, full vesting of outstanding restricted stock units as of the termination date (Mr. Plosch, $1,491,888; Mr. Kane, $690,182; Mr. Wunsch, $780,180).

Accelerated vesting of outstanding performance units based on actual performance through the termination date, annual incentives are paid to other executivesif determinable; if undeterminable, accelerated, full vesting of all outstanding performance units at target levels of performance (Mr. Plosch, $126,254; Mr. Kane, $481,560; Mr. Wunsch, $89,596).

Employment Agreements – Restrictive CovenantsEMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS—RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

As a condition to receiving any of the severance payments and benefits described above, the named executive officersNEOs are required to comply with certain restrictive covenants set forth inunder their respective employment agreements,arrangements, including theExecutive Severance Policy, as described below.

 

NAME

GENERAL RELEASE/

COVENANT NOTTO SUE

NON-COMPETE/NON-SOLICITATION

CONFIDENTIALITY/  

NON-DISPARAGEMENT  

Todd A. Penegor;

Robert D. Wright

12 months (termination for “cause”)

24 months (termination without “cause”)

4 years

Gunther Plosch;

E. J. Wunsch

12 months (termination for “cause”)

18 months (termination without “cause”)

Unlimited

Kurt A. Kane

12 months (termination for “cause”)

24 months (termination without “cause”)

Unlimited

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        57


2010 OMNIBUS AWARD PLAN—KEY SEVERANCE PROVISIONS

NAME

GENERAL RELEASE/

COVENANT NOTTO  SUE

                 NON-COMPETE/NON-SOLICITATION                   

CONFIDENTIALITY/

    NON-DISPARAGEMENT    

Emil J. Brolick

ü

ü

The last day on which his equity awards vest following termination

ü

Unlimited

Todd A. Penegor

ü

ü

12 months (termination for “cause”)

24 months (termination without “cause”)

ü

4  years

Robert D. Wright

ü

ü

12 months (termination for “cause”)

24 months (termination without “cause”)

ü

4  years

Scott A. Weisberg

ü

ü

12 months (termination for “cause” or termination other than due to a “triggering
event”)

24 months (termination without “cause” or termination due to a “triggering event”)

ü

4  years

2010 Omnibus Award Plan – Key Severance Provisions

TYPE OF EQUITY AWARD

 

TERMINATION EVENT

 

IMPACTON OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS

  

Stock Options

 

Termination due to death or disability or termination without “cause” or for “good reason” within 12 months following a “change in control”control.”

 

 

All outstanding stock options will fully vest (Mr. Brolick: $3,168,526;Penegor, $3,873,483; Mr. Penegor: $1,063,727;Plosch, $880,041; Mr. Wright: $401,955; andWright, $1,732,682; Mr. Weisberg: $501,623)Kane, $1,104,165; Mr. Wunsch, $93,737).

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

Termination due to death or disability or termination without “cause” or for “good reason” within 12 months following a “change in control”control.”

 

Termination without “cause”

 

All outstanding restricted stock units will fully vest (Mr. Penegor: $2,115,411; andPenegor, $1,021,521; Mr. Wright: $1,285,938)Plosch, $1,491,888; Mr. Wright, $1,021,521; Mr. Kane, $690,182; Mr. Wunsch, $780,180).

 

Termination without “cause.”

AllFor Messrs. Penegor and Wright, all outstanding restricted stock units granted on December 17, 2014 will fully vest (Mr. Penegor: $1,285,938;Penegor, $1,021,521; Mr. Wright, $1,021,521).

For Mr. Plosch, all outstanding restricted stock units granted on May 2, 2016 will vest pro rata ($1,491,888).

For Mr. Kane, all outstanding restricted stock units granted on May 4, 2015 and August 11, 2017 will vest pro rata ($457,927).

For Mr. Wright: $1,285,938)Wunsch, all outstanding restricted stock units granted on October 3, 2016 will vest pro rata ($390,090).

 

 

Performance Units

 

Termination due to death or disability or termination without “cause” or for “good reason” within 12 months following a “change in control”control.”

 

All outstanding performance units will vest pro rata (on a daily basis) through the date of termination based on actual performance or, if actual performance cannot be reasonably assessed, then based on the assumed achievement of target performance (Mr. Brolick: $4,297,122;Penegor, $2,602,860; Mr. Penegor: $1,129,624;Plosch, $126,254; Mr. Wright: $200,718;Wright, $1,134,246; Mr. Kane, $481,560; Mr. Wunsch, $89,596).

Termination without “cause.”

All outstanding performance units granted on February 25, 2016 and February 28, 2017 will vest pro rata (on a monthly basis) through the date of termination based on actual performance through the end of the performance period (Mr. Penegor, $2,653,590; Mr. Weisberg: $607,334)Plosch, $134,082; Mr. Wright, $1,149,953; Mr. Kane, $492,861; Mr. Wunsch, $95,151).

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        55


Aggregate Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in ControlAGGREGATE POTENTIAL PAYMENTSUPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEIN CONTROL

The estimated aggregate values of the severance payments and benefits that would be provided to the named executive officersNEOs in connection with the qualifying termination events described above pursuant to their respective employment agreementsarrangements, theExecutive Severance Policy and the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan are shown in the table below.

 

NAME  

TERMINATION DUE TO

DEATH OR DISABILITY
($)

  

TERMINATION DUE
TO RETIREMENT

($)

 

TERMINATION WITHOUT
CAUSEOR DUETOA

TRIGGERING EVENT

($)

   

TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE OR
FOR  GOOD REASON FOLLOWED BY A

CHANGE IN CONTROL

($)

 

TERMINATION DUE TO

DEATHOR DISABILITY

($)

 

 

TERMINATION WITHOUT

CAUSEOR DUETOA

TRIGGERING EVENT

($)

 

TERMINATION WITHOUT

CAUSE FOLLOWED BY A

CHANGE IN CONTROL

($)

 

Emil J. Brolick

  7,465,648

 

   

 

3,290,438 

 

(1) 

 

  

 

 

  

 

   

 

13,070,926

 

  

 

Todd A. Penegor

  4,308,762

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

5,246,739

 

  

 

   

 

7,049,434

 

  

 

 

 

$7,497,864

 

 

 

 

$10,064,104

 

 

 

 

$12,049,989

 

 

Gunther Plosch

 

 

$2,498,184

 

 

 

 

$3,263,975

 

 

 

 

$4,093,184

 

 

Robert D. Wright

  1,888,612

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

3,315,713

 

  

 

   

 

3,811,957

 

  

 

 

 

$3,888,450

 

 

 

 

$5,298,253

 

 

 

 

$6,079,285

 

 

Scott A. Weisberg

  1,108,957

 

   

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

1,644,713

 

  

 

   

 

2,753,670

 

  

 

Kurt A. Kane

 

 

$2,275,906

 

 

 

 

$2,731,300

 

 

 

 

$3,693,406

 

 

E. J. Wunsch

 

 

$963,513

 

 

 

 

$1,506,486

 

 

 

 

$2,261,013

 

 

 

(1)

Does not include the value that would be realized by Mr. Brolick from the continued vesting during the applicable vesting periods of his outstanding equity awards in the event of his termination due to retirement pursuant to his employment agreement.

Key Assumptions and Definitions58        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


KEY ASSUMPTIONSAND DEFINITIONS

The following assumptions were made in calculating the value of the severance payments and benefits described in the tables above:

 

  

The triggering event took place on December 31, 2015,29, 2017, the last business day of 2015;2017;

 

 

  

The price of our Common Stock was $10.77$16.42 per share, the closing price on December 31, 2015;29, 2017;

 

 

  

No compensation offset for executives whose second yearsecond-year severance payments would otherwise be subject to reduction for outside earnings;

 

 

  

The immediate exercise and sale of all stock options and the immediate sale of all restricted stock units and performance units that vested as of the December 31, 201529, 2017 triggering date;

 

 

  

Accelerated vesting of performance units is based on the assumed achievement of target performance; and

 

 

  

Nosix-month delay in payment to any “specified employee” that would otherwise be required under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

Cause” is generally defined to include: (i) commission of any act of fraud or gross negligence that has a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company or its affiliates; (ii) willful material misrepresentation to the Company or the Board; (iii) willful failure or refusal to comply with any material obligations or any reasonable and lawful instructions of the President and Chief Executive Officer or the Board; (iv) engagement in any misconduct or commission of any act that is injurious or detrimental to the substantial interest of the Company or any of its affiliates; (v) indictment for any felony; (vi) failure to comply with any material written rules, regulations, policies or procedures of the Company; (vii) willful or negligent failure to comply with the Company’s policies regarding insider trading; or (viii) the executive’s death or disability.

Triggering event” is generally defined to include: (i) material reduction in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities; (ii) requirement to report to any person other than the President and Chief Executive Officer or the Board; (iii) reduction in the executive’s base salary or target annual cash incentive opportunity percentage; or (iv) requirement to relocate to a work site outside of Columbus, Ohio.

Good reason” is generally defined to include: (i) material reduction in the executive’s base salary or target annual cash incentive opportunity; or (ii) requirement to relocate to a work site more than 50 miles from the executive’s principal residence.

Change in control” is generally defined to include: (i) acquisition by any person or group of beneficial ownership of 50% or more of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock or the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, subject to certain exceptions; (ii) during any period of 24 months, individuals who, at the beginning of such period, constitute the Board of Directors (i.e., “incumbent directors”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, provided that any director whose election or nomination for election was approved by at leasttwo-thirds of the incumbent directors then on the Board is deemed an incumbent director; (iii) stockholder approval of a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation of the Company; (iv) sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company; or (v) consummation of a reorganization, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, share exchange or similar transaction involving the Company that requires stockholder approval, subject to certain exceptions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the acquisition of any portion of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors by, or the merger, consolidation or sale of assets of the Company with or to, Nelson Peltz or Peter W. May (or any person controlled by Messrs. Peltz or May) will not constitute a “change in control.”

 

56        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        59


PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As mandated by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act and called for under Item 402(u) of SEC RegulationS-K, beginning with this Proxy Statement, we are required to annually disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Penegor) to the annual total compensation of our median employee, pursuant to the calculation and disclosure requirements.

Approximately 90% of our employee population is comprised of restaurant team members who are paid hourly. Our restaurant roles provide flexible employment opportunities for Wendy’s team members who seek accommodating work schedules, supplemental income or social connection, although such flexible and part-time employment has the effect of lowering the annual total compensation for our median employee. We identified the median employee by examining the tax and payroll records of our employee population (including full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees), excluding our Chief Executive Officer, on December 1, 2017. Other than Mr. Penegor and ournon-U.S. employees, all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries were considered in our identification of the median employee. We excluded 58non-U.S. employees, which represents approximately 0.5% of the Company’s total employee population of approximately 12,425 individuals as of December 1, 2017. Of the excluded employees, 44 are employed in Canada, four in Singapore, four in the United Arab Emirates and one in each of Brazil, Guatemala, Hungary, Japan, Philippines and Puerto Rico.

To determine the median employee, we used total cash compensation paid in 2017 as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on FormW-2, which includes base salary for salaried colleagues, base hourly compensation and overtime for hourly permanent employees, actual compensation for seasonal or temporary colleagues, and any cash incentive compensation. No cost of living adjustments were made to determine the median employee. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments or estimates with respect to total cash compensation, nor did we annualize the compensation for any employees who were not employed by us for all of 2017. We believe the use of such reported total cash compensation is a consistently applied compensation measure because we do not widely distribute annual equity awards to employees.

Based on total cash compensation, our median employee was identified as a restaurant team member who in 2017 was paid on an hourly basis and worked 1,892 hours.

Upon identifying the median employee, such employee’s annual total compensation was calculated using the same methodology that we use to determine the annual total compensation of Mr. Penegor and our other Named Executive Officers as set forth in the “2017 Summary Compensation Table” in this Proxy Statement.

Based on the foregoing, our median employee’s 2017 annual total compensation was $18,573. Mr. Penegor’s 2017 annual total compensation was $5,472,993, as reported in the “2017 Summary Compensation Table” above. As a result, we estimate that for 2017, the ratio of Mr. Penegor’s annual total compensation to that of our median employee was approximately 295:1.

We believe our pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with applicable SEC rules, based on our employment and payroll records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules governing pay ratio disclosure allow companies to apply numerous different methodologies, exclusions and reasonable assumptions, adjustments and estimates that reflect their compensation practices. For that reason, the pay ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies, as other companies might have different employment and compensation practices and might use various methodologies, exclusions, assumptions, adjustments and estimates in calculating their own pay ratios. Previously, the Company was not required to provide pay ratio disclosures. Accordingly, our executive compensation process does not include an examination of our pay ratio. We have provided this pay ratio information for compliance purposes, and neither the Compensation Committee nor Company management have used the pay ratio measure to influence any compensation actions or decisions.

60        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s compensation program fornon-management directors is designed to:

 

  

Be competitive with companies against which the Company competes for director talent;

 

 

  

Encourage and facilitate ownership of our Common Stock bynon-management directors; and

 

 

  

Take into consideration stockholder views regarding director compensation.

 

The Compensation Committee has responsibility for reviewing the competitiveness and appropriateness of the compensation program fornon-management directors and for approving or making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to director compensation. In carrying out its duties, the Compensation Committee has established a process to review on a bi-annual basis, the competitive positioning of the Company’s director compensation program. In December 2014,Such review was previously conducted on a biennial basis, and in May 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that the frequency of such review process should instead be conducted on an annual basis in order to maintain the competitiveness of our director compensation program based on evolving market trends. The Compensation Committee also requested that its independent outside compensation consultant, FW Cook, & Co., prepare a competitive analysis of the Company’s director compensation program to ensure that itsuch program was providing appropriate levels of compensation. The analysis, which compared the compensation of the Company’snon-management directors against a peer group of 2019 restaurant companies, confirmed that both the design and compensation levels of the Company’s director compensation program were reasonably aligned with market practice.

In June 2015,May 2017, the Compensation Committee considered and evaluated the market data and other elements presented in theguidance provided by FW Cook & Co. report and a number of other factors, including: (i) the Company’s performance since the director compensation program was last changed in May 2013;2016 and June 2015; (ii) the Company’s current initiatives and future growth strategies; (iii) the number of Board and Board committee meetings held; (iv) the increase in the complexity of matters addressed by directors; and (v) stockholder expectations regarding director compensation. After consulting with its independent outside compensation consultant,FW Cook, & Co., the Compensation Committee approved the following changes to the Company’s director compensation program to more closely align the program with market practice and to maintain the program’s competitiveness in attracting and retaining highly qualified directors: (a) an increase in the grant date fair value of the annual restricted stock award from $85,000 to $105,000; (b) an increase to the annual chair retainer amount for the Compensation Committee Chair from $10,000 to $12,500; and (c) for all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the elimination of the $2,000 per meeting fee and replacement with an annual retainer of $8,000. Based on guidance from FW Cook, the retainers aligned within the competitive range of market median.

The value of the annual restricted stock award for each non-management director was increased from $75,000 to $85,000;

The additional annual chair retainer for the Audit Committee Chair was increased from $10,000 to $15,000; and

The additional annual chair retainer for the Compensation Committee Chair was increased from $7,500 to $10,000.

The components of the Company’s current compensation program fornon-management directors, which reflectinclude the changes discussed above that were approved by the Compensation Committee in June 2015,May 2017, are described below.

Annual Retainers

 

  

Eachnon-management director receives an annual retainer for Board service of $67,500.

 

 

  

Each member of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $14,000, and the Audit Committee Chair receives an additional annual chair retainer of $15,000.

 

 

  

Each member of the Compensation Committee receives an annual retainer of $10,500, and the Compensation Committee Chair receives an additional annual chair retainer of $10,000.$12,500.

Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual retainer of $8,000, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair receives an additional annual chair retainer of $7,500.

 

Meeting Fees

 

  

Except as otherwise specifically determined by the Compensation Committee, no meeting fees are paid to members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Subcommittee or Subcommittee.Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Members of all other Board committees receive a fee of $2,000 for each meeting they attend.

 

Annual Restricted Stock Awards

 

  

Eachnon-management director receives a restricted stock award in connection with his or her initial election and annualre-election to the Board. Each restricted stock award has an annual grant date fair value of $85,000$105,000 and vests on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date and the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders, subject to the director’s continuedservice on the Board service on the vesting date.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        61


Non-management directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their annual retainers and meeting fees in shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash. In addition, pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2009 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan”),non-management directors may elect to defer a set percentage or amount of their annual retainers, meeting fees and restricted stock awards into restricted stock units. The restricted

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        57


stock units represent a contingent right to receive shares of Common Stock and, in the case of a deferral of restricted stock awards, are subject to the same vesting schedule as the underlying restricted stock. Dividend equivalent units accrue on all amounts deferred under the 2009 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. All deferred amounts are payable in shares of Common Stock in a lump sum on the earlier of the director’s termination of Board service, a fixed number of years or the director’s death, as elected by the director at the time of deferral.

2015 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION2017 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The table below summarizes the compensation earned by or paid to the Company’snon-management directors for their Board and Board committee service during 2015. Emil J. Brolick,2017. Todd Penegor, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, did not receive any additional compensation during 20152017 for his service as a director.director and is therefore not included in the table. The compensation paid to Mr. BrolickPenegor during 20152017 for his service as an executive officer of the Company is set forth in the “2015“2017 Summary Compensation Table.”Table” above.

 

NAME  

FEES EARNED

OR PAID IN CASH

($) (1)

   

STOCK AWARDS

($) (2)

   

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION

($)

   

TOTAL

($)

   

FEES EARNED

OR PAID IN CASH

($) (1)

  

STOCK AWARDS

($) (2)

  

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION

($)

  

TOTAL

($)

Nelson Peltz

   

 

69,500

 

  

 

   

 

85,000

 

  

 

   

 

482,871 (3)

 

     

 

   

 

637,371

 

  

 

   69,500   105,000   500,000 (3)  674,500

Peter W. May

   

 

75,500

 

  

 

   

 

85,000

 

  

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

160,500

 

  

 

   76,750   105,000    —   181,750

Edward P. Garden (4)

   

 

67,500

 

  

 

   

 

165,834

 

 (5) 

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

233,334

 

  

 

Janet Hill

   

 

78,000

 

  

 

   

 

85,000

 

  

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

163,000

 

  

 

Emil J. Brolick

   69,500   105,000    —   174,500

Kristin A. Dolan

   32,783   96,250    —   129,033

Kenneth W. Gilbert

   45,352   105,000    —   150,352

Janet Hill (4)

   30,428        —     30,428

Dennis M. Kass

   

 

3,616

 

  

 

   

 

42,500

 

 (6) 

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

  46,116

 

  

 

   92,000   105,000    —   197,000

Joseph A. Levato

   

 

114,500

 

  

 

   

 

85,000

 

  

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

199,500

 

  

 

   125,500   105,000    —   230,500

J. Randolph Lewis

   

 

95,500

 

  

 

   

 

85,000

 

  

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

180,500

 

  

 

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin

   

 

63,107

 

  

 

   

 

103,750

 

 (7) 

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

166,857

 

  

 

   82,000   105,000    —   187,000

Matthew H. Peltz

   

 

3,616

 

  

 

   

 

42,500

 

 (6) 

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

  46,116

 

  

 

   71,500   105,000    —   176,500

Peter H. Rothschild

   

 

101,500

 

  

 

   

 

85,000

 

  

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

186,500

 

  

 

   136,750   105,000    —   241,750

David E. Schwab II

   

 

120,750

 

  

 

   

 

85,000

 

  

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

205,750

 

  

 

Jack G. Wasserman (8)

   

 

41,176

 

  

 

   

 

        —

 

  

 

   

 

        —    

 

  

 

   

 

  41,176

 

  

 

Arthur B. Winkleblack

   115,000   105,000    —   220,000

 

 (1)

Consists of the annual Board retainer, annual member retainers for members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, additional annual chair retainers for the Audit Committee, Chair and Compensation Committee Chair,and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and committee meeting fees. For 2015,2017, Messrs. NelsonN. Peltz, May Garden and Matthew H.M. Peltz elected to receive payment of their entire annual retainers and meeting fees in shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash. The number of shares received in lieu of cash was based on the average of the closing price of our Common Stock for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date on which the retainers and meeting fees were otherwise payable.

 

 

 (2)

Unless otherwise indicated, representsthe amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of the annual restricted stock awards granted to each of thenon-management directors on June 1, 2015May 23, 2017 upon theirre-election to the Board at the Company’s 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders (and in the case of Ms. Dolan, who received a prorated award on August 3, 2017), computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Messrs.Mr. Levato and Schwab elected to defer theirhis entire annual restricted stock awards into restricted stock units under the 2009 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

 

 (3)

In connection with Nelson Peltz’s service asnon-executive Chairman, and as a result of the Company’s ongoing assessment of security risks, the Board of Directors has approved reimbursement to Mr. Peltz for a portion of certain security services, security personnel and residential security equipment provided to Mr. Peltz and members of his immediate family. The amount shown reflects the aggregate amount of such security-related expenses reimbursed by the Company during 2015.

Anexpenses. In connection with this reimbursement, an independent professional security consulting firm has providedprovides the Compensation Committee on an ongoing basis with aperiodic security assessmentassessments regarding Mr. Peltz’s security arrangements, including the security issues arising in connection with the business of the Company and the portion of Mr. Peltz’s security costs reimbursed by the Company. For 2015,The amount shown reflects the Company’s reimbursable shareaggregate amount of thesesuch security-related expenses was limited to $500,000, andreimbursed by the Compensation Committee intends to continue to review this matter.Company during 2017.

 

 

 (4)

Mr. Garden resignedMs. Hill retired from the Board on December 14, 2015 to devote more time to other commitments, including service on currentMay 23, 2017 when her term expired at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders and future boards.

58        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


(5)

Also includes the incremental fair value ($80,834) associated with the accelerated vestingreceived a prorated portion of an outstanding restricted stock award held by Mr. Garden on December 14, 2015 in connection with his resignation from the Board, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.her annual retainer for 2017.

 

 

(6)

Represents the grant date fair value of pro-rated restricted stock awards granted to Messrs. Kass and Peltz on December 14, 2015 in connection with their initial election to the Board, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

62        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement

(7)

Also includes the grant date fair value ($18,750) of a pro-rated restricted stock award granted toMs. Mathews-Spradlin on March 11, 2015 in connection with her initial election to the Board, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(8)

Mr. Wasserman retired from the Board on June 1, 2015 when his term expired at the Company’s 2015 annual meeting of stockholders.


The following table shows, for eachnon-management director who served on our Board during 2017, the aggregate number of shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options outstanding as of the end of 2015.2017.

 

NAME 

SHARESOF RESTRICTED STOCK
OUTSTANDING AS OF 2015 FYE

 

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

OUTSTANDING AS OF 2015 FYE

 

STOCK OPTIONS

OUTSTANDING AS OF 2015 FYE  

 SHARES OF RESTRICTED STOCK
OUTSTANDING AS OF 2017 FYE (1)
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
OUTSTANDING AS OF 2017 FYE (2)
 

STOCK OPTIONS

  OUTSTANDING AS OF 2017 FYE (3)  

Nelson Peltz

 

7,599

 

  

        —

 

  

12,000

 

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

12,000

 

Peter W. May

 

7,599

 

  

        —

 

  

12,000

 

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

12,000

 

Edward P. Garden

 

      —

 

  

        —

 

  

12,000

 

Janet Hill

 

7,599

 

  

        —

 

  

45,000

 

Emil J. Brolick

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Kristin A. Dolan

 

 

6,259

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Kenneth W. Gilbert

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Janet Hill (4)

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Dennis M. Kass

 

3,995

 

  

        —

 

  

        —

 

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Joseph A. Levato

 

      —

 

  

104,718  

 

  

36,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

124,189

 

  

 

12,000

 

J. Randolph Lewis

 

7,599

 

  

        —

 

  

45,000

 

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin

 

7,599

 

  

        —

 

  

        —

 

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Matthew H. Peltz

 

3,995

 

  

        —

 

  

        —

 

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Peter H. Rothschild

 

7,599

 

  

        —

 

  

        —

 

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

David E. Schwab II

 

      —

 

  

104,718  

 

  

36,000

 

Jack G. Wasserman

 

      —

 

  

        —

 

  

24,000

 

Arthur B. Winkleblack

 

 

6,510

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

(1)

Represents the aggregate number of shares of our Common Stock underlying the outstanding unvested restricted stock awards for eachnon-management director as of December 31, 2017.

(2)

Represents annual retainer amounts, meeting fees and annual restricted stock awards that eachnon-management director elected to defer into restricted stock units under the 2009 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

(3)

Represents the aggregate number of shares of our Common Stock underlying the outstanding stock option awards for eachnon-management director as of December 31, 2017.

(4)

Ms. Hill retired from the Board on May 23, 2017 when her term expired at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        5963


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Company’s executive officers as of the date of this Proxy Statement are identified below.

 

NAME

AGE

POSITION

 

Emil J. BrolickNAME

  

 

68AGE

    

 

Chief Executive Officer                          POSITION

 

Todd A. Penegor

  

 

50

52

    

 

President and Chief FinancialExecutive Officer

 

Robert D. WrightLeigh A. Burnside

  

 

48

47

    

 

Executive Vice President, Chief OperationsAccounting Officer

 

Liliana M. Esposito

  

 

41

43

    

 

Chief Communications Officer

 

Kurt A. Kane

  

 

44

46

    

 

Chief Concept and& Marketing Officer

 

Scott A. KrissColey O’Brien

  

 

47

 

Senior Vice President – Chief Accounting and Tax Officer44

Scott A. Weisberg

 

52

    

 

Chief People Officer

Gunther Plosch

50

Chief Financial Officer

Abigail E. Pringle

44

Chief Development Officer

David G. Trimm

52

Chief Information Officer

Robert D. Wright

50

Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer and International

E. J. Wunsch

46

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Additional information concerning the executive officers is provided below, including their respective positions with the Company and prior business experience (other than Messrs. Brolick andMr. Penegor, for whom such information is provided above under the caption “Proposal 1—Election of Directors”). Executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors and hold office until the organizational meeting of the Board following the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders next succeeding their election and until their successors are elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal.

 

RLOBERTEIGH D. WA. BRIGHTURNSIDE

Mr. WrightMs. Burnside joined the Company in December 2013September 2004 and has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief OperationsAccounting Officer since December 2014. Mr. Wright previouslyAugust 14, 2017. She served as our Chief Operations OfficerVice President—Finance and Planning from March 2014September 2013 to December 2014.August 2017, Vice President—Strategic Financial Analysis from July 2011 to September 2013, Director of Strategic Financial Analysis from June 2009 to July 2011, Director of Financial Reporting from September 2006 to June 2009 and Director of External Reporting and Technical Compliance from September 2004 to September 2006. Prior to joiningher tenure with the Company, Mr. WrightMs. Burnside worked at L Brands, Inc. (formerly known as Limited Brands, Inc.), where she served as President, Chief Operating OfficerManager of Internal Audit from May 2004 to September 2004 and Interim Chief Executive Officer for Charley’s Grilled SubsManager of Financial Reporting from December 2010May 2001 to December 2013. Prior to that, heMay 2004. Previously, Ms. Burnside served as Executive Vice President of Company and Franchise Operations at Checkers Drive-In RestaurantsExternal Reporting Manager for Borden, Inc. from January 2008July 1999 to August 2010. Previously, Mr. Wright worked for ten years at Wendy’s InternationalMay 2001. Ms. Burnside’s corporate accounting and financial reporting, planning and analysis experience also includes her work in various corporate roles, including Vice President of Operationspublic accounting with Arthur Andersen LLP, where she served as Audit Manager from May 1997 to July 1999, and Training Integration from 2006 to 2008, President of Cafe Express, LLC from 2005 to 2006, Director of Area Operations from 2000 to 2005 and Franchise Area Director from 1998 to 2000. Prior to joining Wendy’s International, Mr. Wright worked aswith Coopers & Lybrand, where she was a Senior Franchise Consultant at Domino’s PizzaAssociate from 1993September 1994 to 1998. Mr. Wright also serves asMay 1997 and an Associate from September 1992 to September 1994. Ms. Burnside is a trustee of the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption.certified public accountant (inactive).

 

LILIANA M. ESPOSITO

Ms. Esposito has served as our Chief Communications Officer since she joined the Company in June 2014. Prior to joining the Company,Previously, Ms. Esposito worked at Dean Foods Company, one of the leading food and beverage companies in the United States, where she served as Vice President of Corporate Communications and Public Affairs from January 2012 to March 2014 and Senior Director of Public Affairs from January 2010 to December 2011. Prior to that, Ms. Esposito worked at Mercury Public Affairs, a public strategy firm, where she served as Senior Vice President from January 2008 to January 2010 and Vice President from July 2005 to December 2007. Prior to joining Mercury Public Affairs, Ms. Esposito served as Public Affairs Manager at Mars, Inc., from July 2000 to July 2005. Previously, she served as a Senior Associate with Burson-Marsteller, a global public relations and communications firm. Ms. Esposito is a member of the board of directors of Quality Supply ChainCo-op, Inc. (“QSCC”), the independent purchasing cooperative for the Company and Wendy’s system. She also serves as a trustee of the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption.

 

64        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


KURT A. KANE

Mr. Kane joined the Company in May 2015 and has served as our Chief Concept and& Marketing Officer since October 2015. Mr. Kane previously served as our Chief Concept Officer from May 2015 to October 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kane worked at Yum! Brands, Inc. for seven years, where he held several key leadership positions for the Pizza Hut brand, including Global Chief Marketing and Food Innovation Officer from January 2014 to March 2015, Chief Marketing Officer of Pizza Hut U.S. from February 2011 to December 2013 and Vice President of Brand Marketing and Communications of Pizza Hut U.S. from 2008 to 2010. Prior to joining Yum! Brands, Mr. Kane worked at Frito LayFrito-Lay, Inc. from 2005 to 2008, where he served as Marketing Director for New Products and Multipack Business and as Senior Brand Manager for the Doritos brand. Prior to that, he worked at Molson Coors Brewing Company from 2001 to 2005, where he was a Brand Manager and Brand Director for the Molson portfolio. Mr. Kane began his careerserved as an Air Defense Artillery platoon officer in the 4th Infantry Division of the U.S. Army. Following his military service, he began his business career at The Procter & Gamble Company, where he worked as an Assistant Brand Manager for the Sunny Delight brand from 1998 to 2001. Mr. Kane also serves as a trustee of the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption.

 

60        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


SCCOTTOLEY A. KO’BRISSRIEN

Mr. KrissO’Brien joined the Company in June 2012May 2007 and haswas recently appointed Chief People Officer in March 2018. Previously, he served as our Senior Vice President – Chief Accounting and Tax Officer since November 2014. Mr. Kriss previously served as our Senior Vice President of TaxHuman Resources and Field Capability from June 2012August 2013 to November 2014.December 2017, Vice President of Training from April 2011 to July 2013 and National Director of Operations Training from May 2007 to March 2011. Prior to joininghis tenure with the Company, Mr. Kriss served as Tax Director – AmericasO’Brien worked at Sears Holdings Corporation for Bacardi-Martini, Inc., the largest privately held spirits company in the world, from December 2010 to May 2012. Prior to that,five years, where he served as Vice President – Tax and as a memberDirector of the Administration Committee at Tween Brands, Inc. from August 2008 to March 2010. Prior to joining Tween Brands, Mr. Kriss worked for 14 years at Limited Brands Inc. (now known as L Brands, Inc.) where he held various leadership positions, last serving as Vice President – TaxRetail Training from 2005 to 2008. Previously,2007 and as Manager of Curriculum Development for Sears University from 2002 to 2004. Before joining Sears Holdings Corporation, Mr. Kriss worked atO’Brien was employed from 1999 to 2002 as a Senior Consultant with Arthur Andersen from 1991 to 1994. Mr. Kriss isPerformance and Learning, a certified public accountant.corporate educational institution that developed performance improvement strategies and organizational development opportunities.

 

SGCOTTUNTHER A. WPEISBERGLOSCH

Mr. WeisbergPlosch has served as our Chief PeopleFinancial Officer since April 2012. Prior to joininghe joined the Company Mr. Weisberg served as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of SunEdison Inc. (formerly known as MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.), a global leader of semiconductor and solar technology, from 2010 to 2011.in May 2016. Prior to that, heMr. Plosch worked for 1516 years at General Mills, Inc.,Kellogg Company, a preeminent global food products company, where he held several key leadership positions, including Vice President Human Resources for the U.S. Retail Organizationof Global Business Services from 2007December 2014 to April 2016, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kellogg North America from January 2010 to November 2014, Vice President of Compensation, Benefits and StaffingFinance for Morning Foods from 2005October 2007 to 2007December 2009 and Vice President Human Resourcesof Corporate Planning from May 2005 to September 2007. He also served from May 2000 to April 2005 as the Finance Director of Kellogg Company’s United Kingdom/Republic of Ireland division. Previously, Mr. Plosch worked in Austria, Belgium and the United Kingdom for Supply ChainThe Procter & Gamble Company, where he held various positions in finance from 1991 to 2000.

ABIGAIL E. PRINGLE

Ms. Pringle joined the Company in May 2002 and Technology.has served as our Chief Development Officer since December 2014. She served as our Senior Vice President of Restaurant Development and Growth Initiatives from July 2013 to December 2014, Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Planning from April 2012 to June 2013, Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Planning from November 2008 to March 2012 and Director of Strategic Initiatives and Planning from May 2002 to November 2008. Prior to joining General Mills, her tenure with the Company, Ms. Pringle worked from August 1996 to May 2002 for Accenture plc, a global professional services company, where she served as a consultant in the areas of process reengineering, systems implementations, organizational design and change management.

DAVID G. TRIMM

Mr. WeisbergTrimm has served as our Chief Information Officer since he joined the Company in July 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Trimm worked for 14 years at The Hertz Corporation, one of the largest worldwide airport general use car rental companies, where he held human resourcesseveral key leadership positions, including Executive Vice President and training positions with Nabisco, Inc.Chief Information Officer from 1993October 2013 to 1995January 2015, Senior Vice President—Business Transformation Projects and PepsiCoCustomer Loyalty from 1987August 2012 to 1993.

October 2013, Staff Vice President—eBusiness andRent-a-Car Information Technology from May 2007 to August 2012 and Vice President—Business Systems for Hertz Europe Ltd. from April 2002 to May 2007. Mr. Trimm’s information technology, marketing and operations experience also includes his previous service as Vice President—Business Systems for Hertz Lease Europe (then a division of the Ford Motor Company) from June 2001 to April 2002, Chief Information Officer of Hotel Associates (an online hotel servicesstart-up company in the United Kingdom) from October 2000 to June 2001, Global

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        6165


Systems Development Director for Hilton Group Plc from July 1997 to June 2000, Business Systems Manager for Coca-Cola Schweppes Beverages Ltd. and then Coca-Cola Enterprises from April 1993 to July 1997 and as Business Systems Manager for C&J Clark Ltd (a United Kingdom-based footwear manufacturer and retailer) from 1989 to 1993.

ROBERT D. WRIGHT

Mr. Wright joined the Company in December 2013 and has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer and International since May 2016. He served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer from December 2014 to May 2016 and as Chief Operations Officer from March 2014 to December 2014. Prior to his tenure with the Company, Mr. Wright served as President, Chief Operating Officer and Interim Chief Executive Officer for Charleys Philly Steaks from December 2010 to December 2013. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President of Company and Franchise Operations at CheckersDrive-In Restaurants Inc. from January 2008 to August 2010. Previously, Mr. Wright worked for ten years at Wendy’s International in various corporate roles, including Vice President of Operations and Training Integration from 2006 to 2008, President of Café Express, LLC from 2005 to 2006, Director of Area Operations from 2000 to 2005 and Franchise Area Director from 1998 to 2000. Prior to joining Wendy’s International, Mr. Wright worked as a Senior Franchise Consultant at Domino’s Pizza from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Wright is a member of the board of directors of QSCC and also serves as a trustee of the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption.

E. J. WUNSCH

Mr. Wunsch has served as our Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since he joined the Company in October 2016. Previously, Mr. Wunsch worked for 17 years at The Procter & Gamble Company, a global leader in providing branded consumer packaged goods, where he held several key leadership positions, including Vice President and General Counsel—North America andGo-To-Market and Global Practices from July 2015 to September 2016, Associate General Counsel—Global Baby, Feminine & Family Care and Asia Innovation, Commerce & Brand Equity from September 2013 to July 2015, Associate General Counsel—ASEAN, India, Australia/New Zealand & Asia Developing Markets from August 2011 to September 2013, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel—Corporate, Securities & Employee Benefits from November 2006 to August 2011, and Associate Director and Senior Counsel—M&A/Licensing and Baby, Feminine & Family Care from April 2004 to November 2006, Senior Counsel and Counsel—Corporate, Securities & Employee Benefits from November 2000 to April 2004 and Counsel—Beauty Care from November 1999 to November 2000. Prior to joining The Procter & Gamble Company, Mr. Wunsch was an associate attorney with the Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP law firm from 1997 to 1999 and a law clerk for the Honorable Richard F. Suhrheinrich from 1996 to 1997.

66        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


STOCK OWNERSHIP AND RETENTION GUIDELINES

FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has adopted theStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executive Officers and Directors (the “Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines”), a copy of which is available on the Company’sour website atwww.aboutwendys.comwww.wendys.com/who-we-are.TheStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines were adopted by the Board to further align the interests of executive officers and directors with the interests of stockholders and to promote the Company’s commitment to sound corporate governance. A summary of theStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines is set forth below.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executive OfficersSTOCK OWNERSHIPAND RETENTION GUIDELINESFOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Chief Executive Officer must own an amount of Common Stock equal to at least five times his base salary, and each of the other executive officers must own an amount of Common Stock equal to at least three times his or her base salary. Until an executive officer satisfies the applicable ownership requirement, he or she is required to hold at least 75% of the net shares received upon the exercise of stock options, the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and the payout of performance units. Once the ownership requirement is met, the executive officer must continue to hold at least that number of shares until leaving his or her position with the Company.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Non-Management DirectorsSTOCK OWNERSHIPAND RETENTION GUIDELINESFOR NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

Eachnon-management member of the Board must own an amount of Common Stock equal to at least five times the annual cash retainer payable for Board service. Until a director satisfies the ownership requirement, he or she is required to hold at least 75% of the net shares received upon the exercise of stock options, the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and the payout of performance units. Once the ownership requirement is met, the director must continue to hold at least that number of shares until leaving the Board.

General ProvisionsGENERAL PROVISIONS

Because executive officers and directors must retain at least 75% of the net shares received from any exercise of stock options, vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and payout of performance units until they satisfy the applicable ownership requirement, there is no set time period for initial satisfaction of theStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines. InGuidelines.In the case of financial hardship or other unusual situations, the ownership requirements may be waived upon the approval of the Compensation Committee and, in the case of executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer.

In August 2017, the Board, upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, approved a modification to the “net shares” definition to expand the meaning to encompass both withholding taxes and any other applicable taxes. Such modification provides our executive officers with the ability to sell additional shares as may be necessary to fund their anticipated tax liability based on their individual tax situation. For stock options, “net shares” means the number of shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of the option, net of any shares used to pay the exercise price andand/or applicable taxes.taxes upon such exercise. For restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units, “net shares” means the number of shares received upon the vesting of the restricted stock or restricted stock units or the payout of the performance units, as applicable, net of any shares used to pay applicable taxes.taxes upon such vesting.

In addition to shares owned directly by an executive officer or a director, theStock Ownership and Retention Guidelines provide that shares held in a trust, shares held by immediate family members residing in the same household, shares held in qualified plans, vested shares or share units held in non-qualifiednonqualified plans and unvested time-based restricted stock or restricted stock units will be counted toward satisfaction of the applicable ownership requirement. Shares held by an executive officer or a director in a margin account or otherwise pledged by an executive officer or a director as collateral for a loan will not be counted toward satisfaction of the applicable ownership requirement. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, none of the Company’s executive officers or directors has pledged any shares of Common Stock.

 

62        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        67


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF

CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership as of March 28, 2016April 9, 2018 (except as otherwise indicated by footnote) by: (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock (constituting our only class of voting securities); (ii) each of the Company’s directors and director nominees; (iii) each of the Company’s named executive officersNEOs included in the “2015“2017 Summary Compensation Table;”Table” above; and (iv) all of the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers includes shares that such persons hadhave the right to acquire within 60 days of March 28, 2016,April 9, 2018, including through the exercise of stock options as shown in the second table below. Except as otherwise indicated by footnote, each person has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to the shares shown in the table.

 

NAMEAND ADDRESSOF BENEFICIAL OWNER   AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
 BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP 
  

PERCENTOF CLASS

BENEFICIALLY OWNED (1)

Nelson Peltz (2)

 56,520,516 (3)(4)(5)  21.0%

Peter W. May (2)

 56,313,437 (3)(4)(5)  21.0%

Edward P. Garden (2)

 41,032,902 (4)(5)  15.3%

Trian Fund Management, L.P. (2)

 40,792,537 (5)  15.2%

Janus Capital Management LLC (6)

 20,276,348 (6)    7.5%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (7)

 18,448,528 (7)    6.9%

Horizon Kinetics LLC (8)

 15,425,904 (8)    5.7%

The Vanguard Group (9)

 14,812,071 (9)    5.5%

BlackRock, Inc. (10)

 14,699,579 (10)    5.5%

Emil J. Brolick

   2,788,374    1.0%

Janet Hill

      222,361 (11)      * 

Dennis M. Kass

          3,995 (12)      * 

Joseph A. Levato

      157,258 (13)      * 

J. Randolph Lewis

      190,916 (14)      * 

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin

          9,349 (15)      * 

Matthew H. Peltz

      333,748 (16)      * 

Todd A. Penegor

      435,777 (17)      * 

Peter H. Rothschild

      101,480 (18)      * 

David E. Schwab II

      212,588 (19)      * 

Arthur B. Winkleblack

                —      * 

Robert D. Wright

        36,370 (20)      * 

R. Scott Toop

      701,562      * 

Scott A. Weisberg

      278,592      * 

Darrell G. van Ligten

                —      * 

Craig S. Bahner

                —      * 

Directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)

 61,869,503  22.7%
 NAMEAND ADDRESSOF BENEFICIAL  OWNER   

 

             AMOUNT AND NATURE

         OF BENEFICIAL  OWNERSHIP

 

PERCENT OF CLASS

  BENEFICIALLY OWNED (1)  

 

Nelson Peltz (2)

 

               49,818,107 (3)(4)(5)

 

 

20.8%

 

 

Peter W. May (2)

 

               49,611,028 (3)(4)(5)

 

 

20.7%

 

 

Edward P. Garden (2)

 

               34,276,286 (4)(5)

 

 

14.3%

 

 

Trian Fund Management, L.P. (2)

 

               34,035,921 (5)

 

 

14.2%

 

 

The Vanguard Group (6)

 

               15,060,913 (6)

 

 

  6.3%

 

 

BlackRock, Inc. (7)

 

               14,682,416 (7)

 

 

  6.1%

 

 

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (8)

 

               12,720,505 (8)

 

 

  5.3%

 

 

Eminence Capital, LP (9)

 

               12,101,840 (9)

 

 

  5.0%

 

 

Emil J. Brolick

 

                 3,510,746 (10)

 

 

  1.4%

 

 

Kristin A. Dolan

 

                        6,259 (11)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Kenneth W. Gilbert

 

                        6,510 (12)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Dennis M. Kass

 

                      18,682 (13)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Joseph A. Levato

 

                    149,356 (14)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin

 

                      24,036 (15)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Matthew H. Peltz (2)

 

                    360,751 (16)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Todd A. Penegor

 

                 1,276,073 (17)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Peter H. Rothschild

 

                    116,167 (18)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Arthur B. Winkleblack

 

                      14,687 (19)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Kurt A. Kane

 

                    153,772 (20)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Gunther Plosch

 

                      84,056 (21)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Robert D. Wright

 

                    426,839 (22)

 

 

  *  

 

 

E. J. Wunsch

 

                      12,332 (23)

 

 

  *  

 

 

Directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)

 

               56,546,103 

 

 

23.1%

 

 

 *

Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.

 

 (1)

All percentages are based upon the number of shares of our Common Stock that were outstanding on March 28, 2016 (268,700,765)April 9, 2018 (239,924,148).

 

 

 (2)

The principal business address of Nelson Peltz, Peter W. May, Edward P. Garden, Matthew Peltz and Trian Fund Management, L.P. (“Trian Partners”) is 280 Park Avenue, 41st Floor, New York, New York 10017.

 

 

68        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


 (3)

In July 2004, Nelson Peltz and Peter W. May entered into a voting agreement pursuant to which they agreed not to vote certain shares of Common Stock held by them or their affiliates without the prior approval of both parties. Accordingly, the information set forth in the table above with respect to Messrs. Peltz and May aggregates their respective ownership interests as described in notefootnote (4) below.

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        63


 (4)

In the case of Nelson Peltz, includes: (i) 9,866,9209,893,461 shares of Common Stock held directly (including 7,5996,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Peltz); (ii) 132,397options held by Mr. Peltz to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock held by the Peltz 2009 Family Trust, a trust whose trustees are Mr. Peltz’s spouse, one of Mr. Peltz’s adult children and an unrelated person;Stock; (iii) 44,169 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Peltz’s spouse; (iv) 81,494 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Peltz’s children;minor children and adult children that live in his household; (v) 132,397 shares of Common Stock held by the Peltz 2009 Family Trust, a trust whose trustees are Mr. Peltz’s spouse, Matthew Peltz and an unrelated person; ; (vi) 195,430 shares of Common Stock owned by the Peltz Family Foundation, anon-profit organization whose trustees are Mr. Peltz, Mr. Peltz’s spouse, one of their adult childrenMatthew Peltz and an unrelated person; (vi) options held by Mr. Peltz to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock; (vii) 5,383,5695,411,235 shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. May (including 7,5996,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. May); (viii) options held by Mr. May to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock; and (ix) 40,792,53734,035,921 shares of Common Stock owned by the Trian Entities identified in notefootnote (5) below. Mr. Peltz disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Peltz’s spouse, Mr. Peltz’s children, the Peltz 2009 Family Trust, the Peltz Family Foundation, Mr. May and the Trian Entities.

 

In the case of Mr. May, includes: (i) 5,411,235 shares of Common stock held directly (including 6,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. May); (ii) options held by Mr. May to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock; (iii) 32,910 shares of Common Stock owned by the May Family Foundation, anon-profit organization whose trustees are Mr. May, Mr. May’s spouse and their two adult children; (iv) 9,893,461 shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Peltz (including 6,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Peltz); (v) options held by Mr. Peltz to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock; (vi) 81,104 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Peltz’s minor children; (vii) 132,397 shares of Common Stock held by the Peltz 2009 Family Trust; and (viii) 34,035,921 shares of Common Stock owned by the Trian Entities identified in footnote (5) below. Mr. May disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by the May Family Foundation, Mr. Peltz, the Peltz 2009 Family Trust, Mr. Peltz’s minor children and the Trian Entities.

In the case of Mr. May, includes: (i) 5,383,569 shares of Common stock held directly (including 7,599 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. May); (ii) 32,910 shares of Common Stock owned by the May Family Foundation, a non-profit organization whose trustees are Mr. May, Mr. May’s spouse and their two adult children; (iii) options held by Mr. May to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock; (iv) 9,866,920 shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Peltz (including 7,599 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Peltz); (v) 132,397 shares of Common Stock held by the Peltz 2009 Family Trust; (v) 81,104 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Peltz’s minor children; (vi) options held by Mr. Peltz to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock; and (vii) 40,792,537 shares of Common Stock owned by the Trian Entities identified in note (5) below. Mr. May disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by the May Family Foundation, Mr. Peltz, the Peltz 2009 Family Trust, Mr. Peltz’s minor children and the Trian Entities.

In the case of Mr. Garden, includes (i) 240,365 shares of Common Stock held directly and (ii) 40,792,537 shares of Common Stock owned by the Trian Entities identified in noteIn the case of Mr. Garden, includes (i) 240,365 shares of Common Stock held directly and (ii) 34,035,921 shares of Common Stock owned by the Trian Entities identified in footnote (5) below. Mr. Garden disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by the Trian Entities.

 

 (5)

Based on: (i) information contained in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on December 15, 2015February 27, 2018 by Trian Partners, Trian Partners, L.P., Trian Partners Master Fund, L.P., Trian Partners Parallel Fund I, L.P., Trian Partners StrategicFund-G II, L.P., Trian Partners StrategicFund-G III, L.P., Trian Partners StrategicFund-K, L.P., Trian Partners StrategicFund-C, Ltd., Trian Partners GP, L.P. ( the foregoing entities collectively, the “Trian Entities”), Trian Fund Management GP, LLC (“Trian Management GP”), Trian Partners General Partner, LLC (“Trian GP LLC”), Trian Partners, L.P. (“Trian Onshore”), Trian Partners Master Fund, L.P. (“Trian Master Fund”), Trian Partners Parallel Fund I, L.P. (“Parallel Fund I”), Trian Partners Strategic Investment Fund, L.P. (“Strategic Fund”), Trian Fund Management GP, LLC (“Trian Management GP” and, together with the foregoing entities, the “Trian Entities”), Nelson Peltz, Peter W. May, Edward Garden and Edward P. Garden;Matthew Peltz; (ii) information contained in Form 4s filed by the Trian Entities and by Messrs. N. Peltz, May, Garden and GardenM. Peltz on or subsequent to December 15, 2015;February 27, 2018; and (iii) information provided to the Company by Trian Partners.

 

Trian GP LLC is the general partner of Trian GP, which is the general partner of the Trian Onshore and Trian Master Fund. Trian Management GP is the general partner of Trian Partners, which serves as the management company for Trian Onshore, Trian Master Fund, Parallel Fund I and Strategic Fund. Each of Trian GP LLC and Trian Management GP are controlled by Nelson Peltz, Peter W. May and Edward P. Garden, who therefore are in a position to determine the investment and voting decisions made by Trian Onshore, Trian GP, Trian GP LLC, Trian Master Fund, Parallel Fund I, Strategic Fund, Trian Partners and Trian Management GP.

Trian Onshore, Trian Master Fund, Parallel Fund I, Strategic Fund and Trian GP directly own 11,592,987, 24,879,624, 1,172,869, 3,134,259 and 12,798 shares of Common Stock, respectively. Messrs. Peltz, May and Garden, by virtue of their relationships to the Trian Entities, and Trian Partners and Trian Management GP, by virtue of their relationships to Trian Onshore, Trian Master Fund, Parallel Fund I and Strategic Fund, may be deemed to have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with regard to, and therefore may be deemed to beneficially own, the shares of Common Stock directly owned in the aggregate by Trian Onshore, Trian Master Fund, Parallel Fund I and Strategic Fund. Each of Trian Partners, Trian Management GP, Mr. Peltz, Mr. May and Mr. Garden disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. Messrs. Peltz, May and Garden and Trian GP LLC, by virtue of their relationships to Trian GP, may be deemed to have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with regard to, and therefore may be deemed to beneficially own, the shares of Common Stock directly owned by Trian GP. Each of Mr. Peltz, Mr. May and Mr. Garden disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.

34,023,123 shares are owned directly by certain Trian Entities that are managed by Trian Partners, an institutional investment manager (and are not held directly by Messrs. N. Peltz, May or Garden). Such shares are currently held in the ordinary course of business with other investment securities owned by the Trian Entities in comingled margin accounts with a prime broker, which prime broker may, from time to time, extend margin credit to certain of the Trian Entities, subject to applicable federal margin regulations, stock exchange rules and credit policies. Messrs. N. Peltz, May and Garden, by virtue of their relationships to the Trian Entities, Trian Partners, Trian Management GP and Trian GP LLC, may be deemed to beneficially own (as that term is defined in Rule13d-3 of the Exchange Act) the shares of our Common Stock that are owned by the Trian Entities. Messrs. N. Peltz, May and Garden disclaim ownership of such shares for all other purposes.

 

64        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


 (6)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2016 by Janus Capital Management LLC (“Janus Capital”) and one of its subsidiaries, INTECH Investment Management (“INTECH”). According to the Schedule 13G/A, (i) Janus Capital, as investment adviser or sub-adviser to certain managed portfolios, has sole voting and dispositive power over 20,232,848 shares of Common Stock held by such managed portfolios and (ii) INTECH, as investment adviser or sub-adviser to certain managed portfolios, has shared voting and dispositive power over 43,500 shares of Common Stock held by such managed portfolios. The principal business address of Janus Capital is 151 Detroit Street, Denver, Colorado 80206.

(7)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2016 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”). According to the Schedule 13G, Dimensional, as investment adviser, investment manager or sub-adviser to certain funds, has sole voting power over 18,024,663 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 18,448,528 shares of Common Stock owned by such funds. The principal business address of Dimensional is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, Texas 78746.

(8)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2016 by Horizon Kinetics LLC. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Horizon Kinetics LLC has sole voting and dispositive power over 15,425,904 shares of Common Stock. The principal business address of Horizon Kinetics LLC is 470 Park Avenue South, 4th Floor South, New York, New York 10016.

(9)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 20162018 by The Vanguard Group. According to the Schedule 13G,13G/A, The Vanguard Group has sole voting power over 153,429101,500 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power over 14,90028,389 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power over 14,656,26214,945,535 shares of Common Stock and shared dispositive power over 155,809115,378 shares of Common Stock. The principal business address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

 

 

        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement        69


 (10)(7)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2016January 23, 2018 by BlackRock, Inc. According to the Schedule 13G,13G/A, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 13,857,62713,992,865 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 14,699,57914,682,416 shares of Common Stock. The principal business address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.

 

 

 (11)(8)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2018 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power over 12,211,900 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 12,720,505 shares of Common Stock. The principal business address of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, Texas 78746.

(9)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018 by Eminence Capital, LP. According to the Schedule 13G, Eminence Capital, LP has shared voting and dispositive power over 12,101,840 shares of Common Stock. The principal business address of Eminence Capital, LP is 65 East 55th Street, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(10)

Includes 7,5996,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Brolick.

(11)

Reflects 6,259 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Ms. Hill.Dolan.

 

 

 (12)

Reflects 6,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Gilbert.

(13)

Includes 3,9956,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Kass.

 

 

 (13)(14)

Includes 105,353124,812 restricted stock units held by Mr. Levato under the 2009 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, each of which represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock.

 

 

 (14)

Includes 11,050 shares of Common Stock owned by a trust, as to which shares Mr. Lewis disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 7,599 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Lewis.

(15)

Includes 7,5996,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Ms. Mathews-Spradlin.

 

 

 (16)

Includes: (i) 5,92132,924 shares of Common Stock held directly (including 3,9956,510 restricted shares that may be voted by Mr. M. Peltz); (ii) 195,430132,397 shares held by the Peltz 2009 Family FoundationTrust (of which Mr. Peltz is a trustee); and (iii) 132,397195,430 shares held by the Peltz 2009 Family TrustFoundation (of which Mr. Peltz is a trustee). Mr. Peltz disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned by the Peltz 2009 Family FoundationTrust and the Peltz 2009 Family Trust.Foundation.

 

 

 (17)

Does not include 197,60862,524 restricted stock units held by Mr. Penegor, each of which represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock.

 

 

 (18)

Includes 7,5996,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Rothschild.

 

 

 (19)

Includes 105,3536,510 restricted shares of Common Stock that may be voted by Mr. Winkleblack.

(20)

Does not include 42,244 restricted stock units held by Mr. Schwab under the 2009 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan,Kane, each of which represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock.

 

 

 (20)(21)

Does not include 120,12491,313 restricted stock units held by Mr. Plosch, each of which represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock.

(22)

Does not include 62,524 restricted stock units held by Mr. Wright, each of which represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock.

 

(23)

Does not include 47,753 restricted stock units held by Mr. Wunsch, each of which represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock.

 

70        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        65


The beneficial ownership table above includes shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days of, March 28, 2016April 9, 2018 by the persons identified in the table below.following table.

 

NAMEOF BENEFICIAL OWNER

  

NUMBER OF SHARES

REPRESENTED BY OPTIONS

Nelson Peltz

   

12,000

Peter W. May

   

12,000

Emil J. Brolick

  2,204,672

Janet Hill

   45,000

2,348,191

Kristin A. Dolan

Kenneth W. Gilbert

Dennis M. Kass

   

Joseph A. Levato

       36,000

J. Randolph Lewis

   45,000

Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin

   

Matthew H. Peltz

   

Todd A. Penegor

   289,173

976,199

Peter H. Rothschild

          —

David E. Schwab II

   36,000

Arthur B. Winkleblack

   

Kurt A. Kane

153,772

Gunther Plosch

59,056

Robert D. Wright

       36,370

R. Scott Toop

   539,965

350,072

Scott A. Weisberg

E. J. Wunsch

   130,381

Darrell G. van Ligten

          —

Craig S. Bahner

          —

Directors and executive officers as a group (17(21 persons)

   3,524,682

4,661,608

SectionSECTION 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceBENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock, to report their beneficial ownership of our Common Stock, and any subsequent changes in their beneficial ownership, to the SEC. Specific due dates for these reports have been established by the SEC, and the Company is required to disclose in this Proxy Statement any late report or known failure to file a required report during the most recent fiscal year. The Company assists our directors and executive officers in completing and filing their reports. Based solely on a review of the reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that, during 2015,2017, all directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements, except that a(i) on behalf of Ms. Pringle, an amendment to Form 43 reporting the issuancedirect beneficial ownership of quarterly dividend equivalent unitsCommon Stock held by Ms. Pringle was filed on March 19, 2015 (one day late) by the Company on June 6, 2017 and (ii) on behalf of eachMs. Burnside, an amendment to Form 3 reporting the direct beneficial ownership of Common Stock held by Ms. Esposito and Messrs. Kriss, Levato, Penegor, Schwab, van Ligten, Wasserman and Wright.

Burnside was filed by the Company on March 2, 2018.

 

66        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        71


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information concerning the Company’s equity compensation plans as of the end of 2015.2017. The 2010 Omnibus Award Plan is currently the only equity compensation plan under which future equity awards may be granted.

 

PLAN CATEGORY

 

NUMBER OF SECURITIES TO BE
ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND  RIGHTS

(a)

 

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE OF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND RIGHTS

(b)

  

NUMBER OF SECURITIES
REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR
FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
(EXCLUDING  SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN COLUMN (a))

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders (1)

 16,683,256 Options $7.76    41,563,973 (2) 
 525,378 Performance Units (3)     
 746,820 Performance Units (4)     
 769,202 Performance Units (5)     

Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders (6)

 

 158,121 Options $4.46    —    

Total

 16,841,377 Options $7.73    41,563,973 (2) 
 525,378 Performance Units (3)  
 746,820 Performance Units (4)  
 

769,202 Performance Units (5)

 

  
PLAN CATEGORY

NUMBEROF SECURITIESTOBE

ISSUED UPON EXERCISEOF

OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,

WARRANTSAND RIGHTS

(a)

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE

EXERCISE PRICEOF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTSAND RIGHTS

(b)

NUMBEROF SECURITIES

REMAINING AVAILABLEFOR

FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
(EXCLUDING SECURITIES

REFLECTEDIN COLUMN (a))

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

17,264,327 Options

$9.58

30,193,318 (2)

614,840 Performance Units (3)
1,069,668 Performance Units (4)

518,892 Performance Units (5)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (6)

60,959 Options

$4.44

Total

17,325,286 Options

$9.56

30,193,318 (2)

614,840 Performance Units (3)
1,069,668 Performance Units (4)

518,892 Performance Units (5)

 

 (1)

Includes the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan and the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Equity Participation Plan (the “2002 Equity Plan”).

 

 

   

The 2010 Omnibus Award Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards and performance compensation awards to employees, officers andnon-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The 2010 Omnibus Award Plan also permitsnon-employee directors to elect to receive all or a portion of their director fees in shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash. Under the terms of the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan, (i) shares of Common Stock subject to awards of stock options or stock appreciation rights are counted against the maximum share limit as one share of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock granted and (ii) shares of Common Stock subject to awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights are counted against the maximum share limit as 2.5 shares of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock granted.

 

 

   

The 2002 Equity Plan provided for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units to officers, employees andnon-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The 2002 Equity Plan also permittednon-employee directors to elect to receive all or a portion of their director fees in shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash. As of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, options to acquire 273,25036,000 shares of Common Stock were outstanding under the 2002 Equity Plan. No further awards may be granted under the 2002 Equity Plan.

 

 

 (2)

Represents the aggregate number of shares available for future issuance under the 2010 Omnibus Award Plan.

 

 

 (3)

Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of two performance goals based on adjusted earnings per share and relative total stockholder returnrestaurant openings and remodels during a three-year performance period (December 29, 2014(January 2, 2017 through December 31, 2017)29, 2019). The number of shares shown as being issuable is based on achieving maximum levels of performance with respect to these awards.

 

 

 (4)

Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of two performance goals based on adjusted earnings per share and relative total stockholder return during a three-year performance period (January 4, 2016 through December 30, 2018). The number of shares shown as being issuable is based on achieving maximum levels of performance with respect to these awards.

72        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


(5)

Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of a performance goal based on adjusted earnings per share during a three-year performance period (December 30, 201329, 2014 through January 1,December 31, 2017). The number of shares shown as being issuable is based on achieving maximum levels of performance with respect to these awards.

 

 

(5)

Each performance unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock subject to the Company’s achievement of two performance goals based on adjusted earnings per share and restaurant openings and remodels during a two and one-half-year performance period (July 1, 2013 through January 3, 2016). The number of shares shown as being issuable is based on achieving maximum levels of performance with respect to these awards.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        67


 (6)

Reflects awards issued under the Wendy’s International 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Wendy’s 2007 Stock Plan”). In connection with the Company’s merger with Wendy’s International in September 2008, the Company assumed certain equity compensation plans of Wendy’s International, including the Wendy’s 2007 Stock Plan. The Wendy’s 2007 Stock Plan had been approved by the shareholders of Wendy’s International prior to the merger. The Wendy’s 2007 Stock Plan provided for the issuance of equity compensation awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance shares, performance units and share awards to eligible employees andnon-employee directors of Wendy’s International and its subsidiaries. As of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, options to acquire 158,12160,959 shares of Common Stock were outstanding under the Wendy’s 2007 Stock Plan. No further awards may be granted under the Wendy’s 2007 Stock Plan.

 

 

68        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        73


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Review and Approval of Related Person TransactionsREVIEWAND APPROVALOF RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Pursuant to its written charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for the review and approval or ratification of all related person transactions involving more than $10,000, using appropriate counsel or other advisersadvisors as the Committee may deem necessary.

The Company has adopted a theRelated Person Transactions Policy (the “RPT Policy”RPT Policy) which sets forth in writing the procedures for the Audit Committee’s review, approval and ratification of related person transactions. TheRPT Policy defines a “related person transaction” as any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant and in which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect interest and which involves more than $10,000. A “related person” is defined as any director, director nominee or officer of the Company, any person who is known to beneficially own more than 5% of the Company’s voting securities, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons and any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed, is a director, trustee, general partner or principal or holds a similar position or has a 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest. The Company’s legal department is primarily responsible for obtaining information from the applicable related person with respect to a proposed related person transaction and for determining, based on the relevant facts and circumstances, whether the transaction is subject to theRPT Policy. IfPolicy.If the transaction is subject to theRPT Policy, the legal department then presents information concerning the transaction to the Audit Committee for review and consideration.

In the course of its review of a proposed related person transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (i) the benefits of the transaction to the Company; (ii) the impact of the transaction on the independence of the Company’s directors; (iii) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (iv) the terms of the transaction; (v) the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees generally; and (vi) other facts and circumstances that may bear on the materiality of the transaction under applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee may seek bids, quotes or independent valuations from third parties in connection with assessing any proposed related person transaction.

Pursuant to theRPT Policy, the Audit Committee will approve only those related person transactions that are in, or are not inconsistentconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as the Committee determines in good faith. If a proposed related person transaction involves any member of the Audit Committee (or an immediate family member of any Audit Committee member), such member would not participate in the review, consideration, approval or ratification of the proposed transaction.

Certain Related Person Transactions Since the Beginning of 2015RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

On June 2, 2015, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to repurchase shares of our Common Stock from Nelson Peltz, Peter W. May and Edward P. Garden and certain of their family members and affiliates, investment funds managed by Trian Partners, an investment management firm controlled by Messrs. Peltz, May and Garden, and the general partner of certain of those investment funds (together with Messrs. Peltz, May and Garden, certain of their family members and affiliates and Trian Partners, the “Trian Group”), who in the aggregate owned approximately 24.8% of our outstanding shares as of May 29, 2015. Pursuant to the agreement, the Trian Group agreed not to tender or sell any of its shares in the $639 million modified Dutch auction tender offer the Company commenced on June 3, 2015. Also pursuant to the agreement, the Company agreed, following completion of the tender offer, to purchase from the Trian Group a pro rata amount of its shares based on the number of shares the Company purchased in the tender offer, at the same price received by stockholders who participated in the tender offer. On July 17, 2015, after completion of the tender offer, the Company repurchased 18.4 million shares of our Common Stock from the Trian Group at the price paid in the tender offer of $11.45 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $210.9 million.

On December 1, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Trian Partners and certain of its affiliates, including Nelson Peltz, Peter W. May and Edward P. Garden (collectively, the “Covered Persons”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Board of Directors, including a majority of the independent directors, approved, for purposes of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Covered Persons becoming the owners of or acquiring an aggregate of up to 32.5% (subject to certain adjustments set forth in the agreement) of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, such that no such persons would be subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 203 solely as a result of such ownership. Certain other provisions of the agreement terminated when the Covered Persons’ beneficial ownership (such approval,of the “Section 203 Approval”). The agreement (otherCompany’s Common Stock decreased to less than 25% of the provisions relating tooutstanding voting power of the Section 203 Approval and certain miscellaneous provisions) terminated pursuant to its termination provisions onCompany in January 15, 2014.

Each of theThe related person transactionstransaction described above was reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the terms of its written charter and theRPT Policy.

Policy.

 

74        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        69


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT*

In accordance with its written charter, the Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s financial statements, and assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the accounting, audit and financial reporting practices of the Company. The Audit Committee is composed of four members who satisfy the independence and financial literacy requirements of NASDAQ and Section 10A of the Exchange Act. The Company’s management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process and for preparing the Company’s financial statements, and the Company’s outside auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of such financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and for issuing a report thereon. The members of the Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to the Committee and on the representations made by management and the independent registered public accounting firm that the Company’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In performing its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017 with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP all matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16,Communications with Audit Committees. In.In addition, the Audit Committee, with and without management present, reviewed and discussed the results of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s examination of the Company’s financial statements.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to prepare a report as to its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, and Deloitte & Touche LLP is required to prepare an attestation report with respect to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management its report regarding its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, and reviewed and discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its report as to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report and Deloitte & Touche LLP’s report are each included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.December 31, 2017.

The Audit Committee received from Deloitte & Touche LLP a written statement regarding all relationships between Deloitte & Touche LLP and the Company that might bear on Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence, consistent with applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding an independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP any relationships that may have an impact on their objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether the provision of services by Deloitte & Touche LLP to the Company not related to the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements referred to above or to the reviews of the interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on FormForm 10-Q is compatible with maintaining Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence.

Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, and subject to the limitations on the role of the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee’s responsibilities described above and in the Audit Committee’s written charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.December 31, 2017.

The Audit Committee:

Arthur B. Winkleblack, Chair

Dennis M. Kass

Joseph A. Levato Chair

J. Randolph Lewis

Peter H. Rothschild

David E. Schwab II

 

 *

This Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Audit Committee Report by reference into such other filing.

 

70        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 2

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

TO PROVIDE STOCKHOLDERS WITH A “PROXY ACCESS” RIGHT

(Item 2 on the Company’s Proxy Card)

In March 2015, in response to a proxy access stockholder proposal submitted by the City of Philadelphia Public Employees Retirement System (“PPERS”) and after consultation with PPERS and other stockholders, the Company agreed to adopt, subject to stockholder approval, procedures that would permit a stockholder, or a group of up to 25 stockholders, owning 3% or more of our outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees constituting up to 20% of our Board (or 25% of our Board, if the number of directors on our Board is less than ten). In February 2016, after consultation with PPERs and other stockholders, and based on our commitment to strong corporate governance practices, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, reviewed and approved amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to implement “proxy access” procedures. The amendments are set forth in our proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which is attached to this Proxy Statement asAnnex B (the “Proxy Access Amendments”). The Board is now submitting the Proxy Access Amendments for stockholder approval as required by the Delaware General Corporation Law and our Certificate of Incorporation.

The Board of Directors believes that implementation of proxy access in the manner set forth in the Proxy Access Amendments will provide meaningful rights to our stockholders while ensuring that the rights are used in a responsible manner, and believes that the Proxy Access Amendments are in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

The Board recommends a voteFOR the approval of the Proxy Access Amendments.

If the Proxy Access Amendments are approved by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Company will file our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware promptly after the Annual Meeting, and the Proxy Access Amendments will become effective upon such filing. If the Proxy Access Amendments are approved by our stockholders, proxy access will be available for use beginning with our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.

Description of the Proxy Access Amendments

The following description is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Proxy Access Amendments as set forth in our proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which is attached to this Proxy Statement asAnnex B. We urge you to readAnnex B in its entirety before casting your vote.

Stockholder Eligibility to Nominate Proxy Access Nominees

Subject to certain conditions and procedures as set forth in more detail in the Proxy Access Amendments, a stockholder, or group of up to 25 stockholders, that has owned 3% or more of the voting power of all shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote in the election of directors continuously for at least three years would be permitted to include a specified number of director nominees and a supporting statement (up to 500 words in support of each nominee’s election) in our proxy materials for an annual meeting of stockholders. Two or more funds that are: (i) under common management and investment control; (ii) under common management and funded primarily by the same employer; or (iii) a group of investment companies (as defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940) will be counted as one stockholder for purposes of the 25-stockholder group limit. No person may be a member of more than one group of stockholders constituting an eligible stockholder with respect to any annual meeting of stockholders.

Calculation of Qualifying Ownership

To ensure that the interests of stockholders seeking to include proxy access nominees in our proxy materials are aligned with those of our other stockholders, a stockholder would be deemed to own only those shares of our Common Stock as to which the stockholder possesses both (i) the full voting and investment rights pertaining to such shares and (ii) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares. The following shares would not count as “owned” shares for purposes of determining whether the ownership threshold has been met:

Shares sold by the stockholder or any of its affiliates in any transaction that has not been settled or closed;

Shares borrowed by the stockholder or any of its affiliates for any purpose or purchased by the stockholder or any of its affiliates pursuant to an agreement to resell; and

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        7175


Shares subject to any option, warrant, forward contract, swap, contract of sale, other derivative or similar agreement entered into by the stockholder or any of its affiliates, whether any such instrument or agreement is to be settled with shares or with cash based on the notional amount or value of our outstanding shares, in any such case which instrument or agreement has, or is intended to have, the purpose or effect of (i) reducing in any manner, to any extent or at any time in the future, such stockholder’s or any of its affiliates’ full right to vote or direct the voting of any such shares, or (ii) hedging, offsetting or altering to any degree gain or loss arising from the full economic ownership of such shares by such stockholder or any of its affiliates.

A stockholder will be deemed to “own” shares held in the name of a nominee or other intermediary so long as the stockholder retains the right to instruct how such shares are voted with respect to the election of directors and the right to direct the disposition of such shares and possesses the full economic interest in such shares. A stockholder’s ownership of shares will also be deemed to continue during any period in which the stockholder has (i) delegated any voting power by means of a proxy, power of attorney or other instrument or arrangement that is revocable at any time by the stockholder without condition or (ii) loaned such shares, provided that the stockholder has the power to recall such loaned shares on not more than five business days’ notice and has recalled such loan shares as of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders.

Maximum Permitted Number of Proxy Access Nominees

The maximum number of proxy access nominees submitted by all eligible stockholders that the Company would be required to include in our proxy materials with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders shall not exceed 20% (or 25%, if the number of directors serving on the Board is less than ten) of the number of directors in office as of the last day on which a notice of proxy access nomination may be delivered to the Company. This maximum permitted number of proxy access nominees will be reduced by the number of:

Individuals who are included in our proxy materials as nominees unopposed or recommended by the Board pursuant to an agreement, arrangement or other understanding with a stockholder or group of stockholders (other than any such agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with an acquisition of stock from the Company by such stockholder or group of stockholders), other than any individual who at the time of the annual meeting will have served as a director continuously as a nominee of the Board for at least two annual terms;

Individuals who were previously elected to the Board as proxy access nominees at either of the preceding two annual meetings of stockholders and who are re-nominated for election at the current annual meeting by the Board; and

Proxy access nominees who were qualified for inclusion in our proxy materials for the current annual meeting whom the Board decides to nominate for election to the Board.

Further, the Company would not be required to include any proxy access nominees in its proxy materials for any annual meeting of stockholders for which the Secretary of the Corporation receives notice that a stockholder intends to nominate one or more persons for election to the Board pursuant to the Company’s advance notice provisions set forth in Section 6 of Article V of our Certificate of Incorporation.

Procedure for Selecting Proxy Access Nominees if Maximum Permitted Number is Exceeded

If the number of proxy access nominees submitted by eligible stockholders exceeds the maximum permitted number, each nominating stockholder will select one of its nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials until the maximum permitted number is reached, going in order of the number (largest to smallest) of shares of our Common Stock each stockholder disclosed as owned in its respective proxy access notice submitted to the Company. No substitute proxy access nominees will be allowed in place of any proxy access nominee who ceases to satisfy the eligibility requirements, withdraws his or her nomination or becomes unwilling to serve on the Board.

Deadline for Submitting Proxy Access Nominees

In order to provide adequate time for the Board to assess proxy access nominees, requests to include such nominees in our proxy materials must be received no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days before the first anniversary of the filing date of our definitive proxy statement for the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders, subject to certain adjustments. If the Proxy Access Amendments are approved by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting, eligible stockholders may submit proxy access nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders no earlier than November 12, 2016 and no later than December 12, 2016.

72        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


Information Required by All Nominating Stockholders

Each stockholder seeking to include a proxy access nominee in our proxy materials would be required to provide certain information to the Company, including, but not limited to the following:

Verification of, and information regarding, the stock ownership of the stockholder as of the date of the submission, and an agreement to (i) provide such information within five business days following the later of the record date for the annual meeting of stockholders or the date on which notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed and (ii) promptly notify the Company if the stockholder ceases to own the required number of shares prior to the date of the annual meeting;

A copy of the Schedule 14N that has been or is concurrently being filed by the stockholder with the SEC;

A description of (i) any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into by or on behalf of the stockholder, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of the stockholder with respect to shares of our Common Stock and (ii) any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or other relationship pursuant to which the stockholder has a right to vote any shares of our Common Stock;

Information regarding each proxy access nominee that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or similar filing, including biographical and stock ownership information;

In the case of a nomination by a group of stockholders, the designation by all group members of one specified group member that is authorized to act on behalf of all group members with respect to the nomination and all related matters; and

In case of a nomination by a group of stockholders in which two or more funds that are counted as one stockholder for purposes of qualifying as an eligible stockholder are part of the same qualifying fund group, documentation reasonably satisfactory to the Company that demonstrates the funds are part of the same qualifying fund group.

Stockholders would also be required to make certain representations to and agreements with the Company, including, but not limited to:

A representation that the stockholder intends to maintain qualifying ownership through the date of the applicable annual meeting, and that the stockholder acquired its qualifying shares in the ordinary course of business and not with the intent to change or influence control of the Company, and does not presently have such intent;

An agreement by the stockholder: (i) not to nominate for election to the Board at the applicable annual meeting any person other than the nominee(s) the stockholder is nominating pursuant to the proxy access procedures; (ii) to refrain from soliciting in support of the election of any individual as a director other than its nominee(s) or a nominee of the Board; (iii) not to distribute any form of proxy for the annual meeting other than the form distributed by the Company; and (iv) to file with the SEC any written solicitation of the stockholders of the Company relating to the annual meeting at which the stockholder’s proxy access nominee will be nominated;

An agreement to comply with all laws and regulations applicable to solicitations and the use of soliciting material in connection with the applicable annual meeting; and

An agreement to assume all liability stemming from any legal or regulatory violation arising out of the stockholder’s communications with the stockholders of the Company or out of the information the stockholder provided to the Company in connection with the nomination, and to indemnify the Company and our directors, officers and employees against any liability, loss or damages in connection with any threatened or pending action, suit or proceeding arising out of any such violations or any failure of the stockholder or its nominee(s) to comply with, or any breach or alleged breach by such stockholder or its nominee(s) of, the proxy access procedures.

Proxy access nominees would also be required to make certain representations to and agreements with the Company, including, but not limited to:

The consent by the proxy access nominee to being named in our proxy statement and form of proxy as a nominee and to serving as a director of the Company if elected;

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        73


An agreement by the proxy access nominee to refrain from becoming a party to (i) any agreement or commitment as to how such nominee will vote on any issue if elected as a director of the Company that has not been disclosed to the Company or that could reasonably be expected to limit or interfere with such nominee’s ability to comply, if elected as a director, with his or her fiduciary duties under applicable law or (ii) any compensatory or other financial agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person (other than the Company) in connection with such person’s service or action as a director of the Company that has not been disclosed to the Company; and

An agreement by the proxy access nominee, if elected as a director, to comply with applicable law and all applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, corporate opportunities, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of the Company relating to such nominee’s Board membership.

Proxy Access Nominee Eligibility

The Company would not be required to include a proxy access nominee in our proxy materials if, among other things:

The nominee would not (i) be an independent director or satisfy the audit, compensation or other board committee independence requirements under applicable stock exchange rules and listing standards, applicable SEC rules or any publicly disclosed independence standards used by the Board or (ii) be a“non-employee director” for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act or an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code;

The election of the nominee would cause the Company to violate our Certificate of Incorporation orBy-Laws, applicable stock exchange rules and listing standards, or any applicable state or federal law, rule or regulation;

The nominee is an officer or director of a competitor, as defined in Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914;

The nominee is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses) or has been convicted in such a criminal proceeding within the past ten years; or

The nominee is subject to any order of the type specified in Rule 506(d) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.

In addition, the Board or the chairman of the annual meeting will declare a proxy access nomination to be invalid, and such nomination will be disregarded, if: (i) the nominating stockholder or proxy access nominee breaches any of its agreements or representations or fails to comply with any of the requirements under the proxy access provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation; (ii) the proxy access nominee becomes ineligible for inclusion in our proxy materials or ineligible or unavailable for election at the applicable annual meeting; or (iii) the nominating stockholder fails to appear at the annual meeting of stockholders to present its nomination.

Restrictions on Re-Nominations

Any proxy access nominee who is included in our proxy materials but subsequently withdraws from or becomes ineligible or unavailable for election at the applicable annual meeting will be ineligible to be a proxy access nominee for the following two annual meetings.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be the equivalent of votes “against” this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR

APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

TO PROVIDE STOCKHOLDERS WITH A “PROXY ACCESS” RIGHT.

74        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 32

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

(Item 32 on the Company’s Proxy Card)

The Audit Committee has determined to appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to examine the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for 2016.2018. The Company’s stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Deloitte at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with its written charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility relating to the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm and the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, independence and performance.

A representative of Deloitte is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions. If the appointment of Deloitte is not ratified at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee may consider, in its sole discretion, the selection of another accounting firm.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm FeesINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

The following table shows the fees billed (or expected to be billed) for professional services rendered by Deloitte for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014,1, 2017, and for other services rendered by Deloitte during 20152017 and 2014.2016.

 

   

2015

   

2014

 

Audit Fees (1)

  $2,757,065    $2,464,833  

Audit-Related Fees (2)

        20,000  

Tax and Tax-Related Fees (3)

   39,905     60,706  

All Other Fees (4)

   9,775     6,825  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,806,745    $2,552,364  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

            FEE CATEGORY

 

  

2017

 

     

2016

 

 

 

 

Audit Fees (1)

  

 

$

 

2,628,116

 

 

    

 

$

 

2,470,735

 

 

 

 

Tax andTax-Related Fees (2)

  

 

 

 

14,892

 

 

    

 

 

 

29,841

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees (3)

  

 

 

 

4,074

 

 

    

 

 

 

4,085

 

 

  

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total

  $2,647,082     $2,504,661 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 (1)

For both 20152017 and 2014,2016, includes fees associated with the integrated audit of the Company’s annual financial statements (including the audit of internal control over financial reporting), the review of the Company’s interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form10-Q, stand-alone audits of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, and statutory audits required internationally. For 2015, also includesinternationally and fees associated with audits of certain strategic initiatives, including the Company’s whole business securitization debt refinancing, the sale of the Company’s bakery operations and the Company’s System Optimization strategic initiative. For 2014,2017, also includes fees associated with the Company’s adoptionrefinancing transaction completed in January 2018, compliance with new revenue recognition guidance and the impact of the 2013 COSO Framework and audits of certain strategic initiatives, including the Company’s System Optimization initiative.tax reform.

 

 

 (2)

For 2014, includes fees associated with audits of the Company’s 401(k) plan.

(3)

For both 20152017 and 2014,2016, includes fees for professional services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including the preparation of international income tax returns.

 

 

 (4)(3)

For both 20152017 and 2014,2016, includes the Company’s subscription to Deloitte’s online library of accounting and financial disclosure literature and the Company’s attendance at Deloitte’s national tax training seminar.literature.

 

As discussed above under the caption “Audit Committee Report,” during 2015,2017, the Audit Committee: (i) discussed with Deloitte any relationships that may have an impact on Deloitte’s objectivity and independence; (ii) satisfied itself as to Deloitte’s independence; and (iii) considered whether the provision of services by Deloitte that were not related to the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements or to the reviews of the Company’s interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form10-Q was compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and ProceduresAUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIESAND PROCEDURES

The Audit Committee has adopted a thePolicy Relating toPre-Approval of Audit and PermittedNon-Audit Services (the “Pre-Approval Policy”Pre-Approval Policy) that requires the Committee topre-approve all services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to the Company and its subsidiaries. In general, predictable and recurring covered services, together with the related fees, may be approved by the Audit Committee on an annual basis.Pre-approval in such circumstances will generally be by reference to classes of covered services, provided that thepre-approval is sufficiently detailed to identify the scope of serviceservices to be provided. ThePre-Approval Policy sets forth a list of covered services that may bepre-approved by class on an annual basis. Covered services that are notpre-approved by class must bepre-approved on an individual basis by the Audit Committee.

 

76        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        75


Under thePre-Approval Policy, any engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm to performpre-approved “tax” or “all other” services must be reported by management to the Audit Committee at its first scheduled meeting following the engagement. The total payments that may be made with respect to “tax” or “all other” services that have beenpre-approved by class may not exceed $200,000 per year. Once the $200,000 threshold has been met in any year, any additional “tax” or “all other” services (including any additional payments for “tax” or “all other” services that were previouslypre-approved) must bepre-approved on an individual basis unless otherwise authorized by the Audit Committee.

Pursuant to thePre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee will establish fee levels or limits for covered services that arepre-approved on a class basis not less frequently than annually. Any covered services for which the estimated fees would cause the total fees for that class of services to exceed the applicable fee limit must be specifically approved by the Audit Committee. For services that are approved by the Audit Committee on an individual basis, the Committee will indicate an approval fee level or limit at the time of approval. The Audit Committee periodically reviews a schedule prepared by management showing the fees paid and estimated to be paid to the independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year for each covered service that was or is being provided by the firm.

ThePre-Approval Policy permits the Audit Committee to delegatepre-approval authority to one or more of its members, provided that (i) the aggregate estimated fees for any covered service approved by delegates may not exceed $100,000 for any applicable fiscal year and (ii) the aggregate estimated fees for all covered services approved by delegates during any fiscal year may not exceed $1,000,000.$1.0 million. Anypre-approval granted by delegates must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

In considering whether to grantpre-approval, the Audit Committee considers the nature and scope of the proposed service in light of applicable legal and regulatory requirements, including the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the PCAOBPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board with respect to auditor independence. The Audit Committee retains discretion to prohibit services that, in its view, may compromise, or appear to compromise, the independence and objectivity of the independent registered public accounting firm.

All of the services provided to the Company by Deloitte during 20152017 werepre-approved by the Audit Committee or its delegates in accordance with the terms of thePre-Approval Policy. Policy.

Required VoteREQUIRED VOTE

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes “against” this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE

THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016.

2018.

 

76        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        77


PROPOSAL 43

ADVISORY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(Item 43 on the Company’s Proxy Card)

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we provide our stockholders with the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.NEOs (also known as a“say-on-pay” vote). We encourage stockholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, which describes in detail how our 20152017 executive compensation program was designed and implemented to achieve our overall compensation objectives. Stockholders also should review the “2015“2017 Summary Compensation Table” included in this Proxy Statement, as well as the related compensation tables, notes and narrative, which provide detailed information regarding the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs for 2015.2017.

Our executive compensation program is designed to support the Company’s business objectives by linking executive pay to individual performance, the Company’s attainment of annual and multi-year operating and financial goals and the creation of long-term stockholder value. The executive compensation program utilizes a variety of sound compensation governance practices that support the Company’s commitment to protecting stockholder interests.

The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to:

 

  

AttractMotivate achievement of the Company’s performance and retain highly-qualified executives;strategic business goals;

 

 

  

MotivateAttract and rewardretain highly qualified executives for achieving individual and Companyby paying competitive compensation levels if performance goals;commensurate to peers is achieved; and

 

 

  

Align the interests of executives with those of the interests ofCompany’s stockholders.

 

Under our executive compensation program, a substantial portion of the total compensation for senior executives is variable (i.e., “at risk”)at-risk) and tied to Company performance. During 2015,2017, performance-based incentives constituted the most significant portion of total direct compensation for our Chief Executive Officer (82%(83%) and our other named executive officersNEOs as a group (69%(71%). This “pay-for-performance”pay-for-performance philosophy aligns executive pay with the Company’s business objectives and ensures that executives are responsive and accountable to stockholder interests.

The primary components of our executive compensation program are described in the table below.

 

COMPONENT

  

                                   PURPOSE

  Base Salary

  

•    Attract and retain highly-qualifiedhighly qualified executives by providing an appropriatea competitive level of fixed cash compensation that reflects the experience, responsibilities and performance of each executiveexecutive.

 

  Annual Cash Incentive CompensationIncentives

  

•    Align executive pay with individual and Company performance by motivating and rewarding executives over aone-year time frame period based on the achievement of strategic business objectives and individual performance goalsobjectives.

 

  Long-Term Equity Incentive CompensationIncentives

  

•    Align the interests of executives with the interests of stockholders and retainhighly-qualified
highly qualified executives by motivating and rewarding executives to achieve
multi-year
strategic business objectivesobjectives.

•    Create a direct link between executive pay and drivethe long-term growth in the priceperformance of our Common StockStock.

  Perquisites and Benefits

•    Provide limited perquisites and benefits, consistent with competitive market practice.

 

TheDuring 2017, the Company achievedreported another year of strong performance and global growth, with our North America and International restaurants contributing to our continued strategic and financial progress, as discussed under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2017 Executive Summary” caption in this Proxy Statement. Through our strong overall operating and financial results, in 2015 and continued to execute our brand vision to Delight Every CustomerTM by providing a Deliciously DifferentTM restaurant experience. During 2015, we drove significant improvements in both our corporate and restaurant-level economic model, accelerated the transformation of the Wendy’s brand, continued to strengthen the Wendy’s franchise system and created significant value for stockholders. Specifically, we achieved year-over-year improvements in our key operating and financial metrics, exceeded targets for new restaurant development and Image Activation restaurant reimaging, continued our transition to a predominantly franchised business model and returned $1.2 billion in cash to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Through our strong operating results and execution of our strategic initiatives, we delivered total stockholder return of 21%24% in 2015 and 144%2017, 96% on a 3-yearthree-year basis and 289% on a five-year basis. At the same time, the overall compensation of our senior executives remained competitive with the market and the restaurant industry, consistent with our executive compensation philosophy.

Notwithstanding strong stockholder support of our executive compensation program, we continue to evaluate ways to further strengthen our commitment to best practices in compensation governance. For 2016, we made certain modifications to our executive compensation program design, including eliminating the individual performance multiplier2018, for our Chief Executive Officer’s annual cash incentive awardincentives, we retained adjusted EBITDA, weighted at 60%, as the key earnings performance metric and increasingmaintained the

78        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


40% weighting and focus on key growth performance metrics by introducing global systemwide sales, weighted at 20%, as an additional key growth performance metric and by decreasing the weighting of the same-restaurant sales key growth performance metric from 40% to 20%. For our long-term equity incentives, we retained the equal weighting of the performance unit component of our long-term equity incentive plan, with a corresponding decrease to the weighting of theand stock option component.components at 50% of grant value for each. For the performance unit component, we also retained relative total stockholder return, weighted at 50%, as a key market performance metric and replaced cumulative three-year adjusted earnings per share, which was weighted at 50%, by adding cumulative three-year free cash flow, weighted as 50%, as a key earnings performance metric.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        77


We believe our strong results in 20152017 are a reflection of our “pay-for-performance”pay-for-performance philosophy and demonstrate that our executive compensation program is effectively designed and continues to serve the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

After considering the foregoing information, together with the more detailed information regarding our executive compensation program set forth in this Proxy Statement, the Company proposes that stockholders approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the “2015“2017 Summary Compensation Table” and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative included in this Proxy Statement for the Company’s 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The vote on this resolution is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. However, the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee will carefully review the voting results and, to the extent there is a significant vote in favor of or against our executive compensation program as described in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee will consider whether to implement, or recommend to the Board of Directors the implementation of, any modifications to the Company’s compensation programs and policies in response to such vote.

Required VoteREQUIRED VOTE

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes “against” this proposal. Brokernon-votes will not be included in the tabulation of voting results for this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR

APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

 

78        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        79


OTHER MATTERS

Other Matters to Come Before the Annual MeetingOTHER MATTERSTO COME BEFORETHE ANNUAL MEETING

The Company is not aware of any other matters that are intended to be brought before the Annual Meeting. The proxy being solicited by the Board of Directors does, however, convey discretionary authority to the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card to vote on any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by properly submitted proxies in accordance with their best judgment, to the extent permitted by applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Contacting DirectorsCONTACTING DIRECTORS

If you would like to contact the Board of Directors, thenon-management directors as a group or any individual director, you may send ane-mail tocorporate-secretary@wendys.com or write to the following address: The Wendy’sSecretary of the Company One Dave Thomas Boulevard, Dublin, Ohio 43017, Attention:at our corporate offices at the address provided under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Secretary.Offices.” Your communication should specify the intended recipient or recipients, and will be forwarded by the Corporate Secretary to such recipient or recipients. Any communication that relates to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be forwarded by the Corporate Secretary to the ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee.

Stockholder Proposals for 2017 Annual Meeting of StockholdersSTOCKHOLDER PROPOSALSFOR 2019 ANNUAL MEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERS

Our Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws provide that, except as otherwise provided by law, only business properly brought before an annual or special meeting of stockholders may be conducted at such meeting. To be properly brought before a meeting,do so, a stockholder proponent and stockholder proposal (including Rule14a-8 Proposals and Proxy Access Director Nominations) must be (i) submitted tosatisfy the Company for inclusionapplicable eligibility, notice, content, stock ownership and other requirements set forth in its proxy materials in compliance with Section 14our Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws. Rule14a-8 Proposals must additionally meet the applicable requirements of Rule14a-8 of the Exchange Act or (ii) specified in a written notice given by aAct.

All stockholder of record who is entitled to vote at such meeting and who complies with the notice and other provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation. The noticeproposals must be delivered personally to, or mailed to and received at, the principal executive offices of the Company,(i) addressed to the Secretary of the Company.

Our CertificateCompany and (ii) received by the Company at our corporate offices within the timeframes noted below (the address for our Secretary and corporate offices is provided below under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices”). Please note that delivery of Incorporation specifiesany stockholder proposal must be made personally or by mail, and delivery bye-mail, facsimile or other means willnot satisfy the requirements applicable to a stockholder’s notice of proposed business. Those requirements, which are set forth in Sections 5, 6 and 7 of Article V of our Certificate of Incorporation. A stockholder who wishes to submit any business before the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2019 Annual Meeting”) is encouraged to seek independent counsel regarding the requirements under our Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws and SEC rules and regulations, and the Company reserves the right to forego consideration of any submitted business that is not timely or otherwise does not satisfy the appropriate requirements.

Bringing Stockholder Proposals Before the 2019 Annual Meeting

Stockholders may submit proposals (including director nominations) for consideration at the 2019 Annual Meeting that are summarized below.

The window within which a stockholder must give notice of proposed business (including director nominations) for an annual meeting of stockholders is the periodnot Rule14a-8 Proposals, not earlier than 120 days and not later than 90 days before the first anniversary of the date of the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

The notice must disclose the name, record address and information concerning the beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock by the stockholder and any “stockholder associated person” (i.e., any other beneficial owner of the Company’s stock beneficially owned by such stockholder, or any person that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such stockholder or beneficial owner), together with a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the text of the proposal, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, and any material interest of the stockholder and any stockholder associated person in such business.

Certain disclosures are also required concerning the relationships of the stockholder and any stockholder associated person, including:

O

Any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to the proposed business;

O

The stockholder’s and any stockholder associated person’s derivative positions or hedging transactions with respect to the Company’s stock;

O

Any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or other relationship pursuant to which the stockholder or any stockholder associated person has the right to vote the Company’s stock;

O

Any rights to dividends on the Company’s stock beneficially owned by the stockholder or any stockholder associated person that are separated or separable from the underlying stock;

O

Any proportionate interest in the Company’s stock or derivatives in respect of the Company’s stock held by a general or limited partnership in which the stockholder or any stockholder associated person is a general partner or beneficially owns an interest in a general partner; and

O

Any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) to which the stockholder or any stockholder associated person is entitled based on any increase or decrease in the value of the Company’s stock or derivatives in respect of the Company’s stock.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        79


The notice also must include: (i) a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of the Company’s stock who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such business; (ii) a representation as to whether the stockholder intends to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of the proposed business; (iii) a representation that the stockholder will provide any other information reasonably requested by the Company; and (iv) all other information that would be required to be filed with the SEC if the stockholder or any stockholder associated person was a participant in a solicitation subject to Section 14 of the Exchange Act.

Additional information is required for director nominations, including a description of all compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships between or among the stockholder, any stockholder associated person and any other person acting in concert with the stockholder (including a description of the director nominee’s interest in any such agreement, arrangement or understanding and the approximate dollar value of such interest).

The stockholder is required to update and supplement all information provided to the Company so that such information is true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is 10 business days before the meeting. Such updates and supplements must be received by the Company not later than five business days after the record date for the meeting and not later than seven business days before the date of the meeting.

To be eligible to be a nomineeAccess Director Nominations and not otherwise intended for election as a director, a person must (i) consent to being namedinclusion in the Company’s proxy statement as a director nominee,materials for the 2019 Annual Meeting. To be timely and to serve as a director if elected, and (ii) timely deliver to the Secretary of the Company a written questionnaire with respect to such person’s background and qualifications, and the background of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, together with a written representation and agreement that such person is not and will not become a party to certain voting or compensation agreements and that such person, if elected, will comply with all applicable corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality, stock ownership and trading and other policies and guidelines of the Company.

If the Chairman presiding over the meeting determines that the proposed business (including director nominations) was not properly brought before the meeting in accordance with the applicable provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation, the Chairman shall so declare at the meeting, and the business will not2019 Annual Meeting, any such stockholder proposal must be transacted at the meeting. Additionally, if the stockholder (or a qualified representative of the stockholder) does not appear at the meeting to present the proposed business, the business will not be transacted at the meeting, regardless of whether proxies in respect of such business may have been received by the Company. Any questions relating toCompany not earlier than February 5, 2019 and not later than March 7, 2019. However, if the date of the 2019 Annual Meeting occurs more than 30 days before, or more than 60 days after, June 5, 2019, the Company must receive such stockholder proposals should be submitted(i) not earlier than 120 calendar days before the 2019 Annual Meeting date and (ii) not later than the later of (a) 90 calendar days before the 2019 Annual Meeting date or (b) the tenth day after the date on which we publicly disclose the 2019 Annual Meeting date by mail, in writing toa press release or in a document filed with the Corporate SecretarySEC.

Stockholder Proposals Intended for Inclusion in 2019 Proxy Materials

Stockholders may submit proposals (other than Proxy Access Director Nominations) under Rule14a-8 of the CompanyExchange Act for inclusion in our 2019 proxy materials and consideration at the Company’s principal executive offices.

Any stockholder proposal submitted pursuant2019 Annual Meeting (“Rule14a-8 Proposals”). Pursuant to Rule14a-8, under to be timely and properly brought before the Exchange Act2019 Annual Meeting, any Rule14a-8 Proposal must be received by the Company not later than the close of business on December [15], 2016 to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. Any stockholder proposal submitted outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (including director nominations) must be received by the Company not earlier than January 26, 2017 and not later than February 25, 2017 to be properly brought before the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. In each case, the proposal must be delivered personally to, or mailed to and received at, the principal executive offices of the Company, addressed to the Secretary of the Company.21, 2018. Please note that, delivery of stockholder proposals by e-mail, facsimile or other meansas the SEC rules make clear, simply submitting a Rule14a-8 Proposal does not guarantee that such proposal willnot satisfy the requirements of be included in our Certificate of Incorporation.2019 proxy materials.

At the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors is recommending that

80        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


Director Nominations Intended for Inclusion in 2019 Proxy Materials (Proxy Access)

In 2016, our stockholders approveapproved amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to implement “proxy access” procedures. If the Proxy Access Amendments are approvedprocedures for director nominations submitted by our stockholders, proxy access will be available for use by eligible stockholders beginning with our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. See “Proposal 2 – Approval of Amendments to the Company’sAs provided in more detail in our Certificate of Incorporation, proxy access permits a stockholder, or a group of up to Provide Stockholders with a ‘Proxy Access’ Right” above for a description25 stockholders, owning 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to 20% of our Board of Directors (or 25%, if the number of directors serving on the Board is less than ten) (“Proxy Access Amendments, including the deadline for submitting proxy access nominees to the CompanyDirector Nominations”).

Stockholders may submit Proxy Access Director Nominations for inclusion in our 2019 proxy materials for our 2017 annual meetingand consideration at the 2019 Annual Meeting. To be timely and brought before the 2019 Annual Meeting, any Proxy Access Director Nomination must be received by the Company not earlier than November 21, 2018 and not later than December 21, 2018. However, if the date of stockholders.

80        The Wendy’sthe 2019 Annual Meeting occurs more than 30 days before, or more than 60 days after, June 5, 2019, the Company 2016must receive Proxy StatementAccess Director Nominations (i) not earlier than 120 calendar days before the 2019 Annual Meeting date and (ii) not later than the later of (a) 90 calendar days before the 2019 Annual Meeting date or (b) the tenth day after the date on which we publicly disclose the 2019 Annual Meeting date by mail, in a press release or in a document filed with the SEC.


Householding of Annual Meeting MaterialsHOUSEHOLDINGOF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS

Some banks, brokers and other nominees follow the practice of “householding” proxy materials. This means that multiple beneficial owners of our Common Stock who share the same address or household may not receive separate copies of this Proxy Statement, the notice regarding theNotice of Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting,Availability or the Company’s 20152017 Annual Report to Stockholders. The Company will promptly deliver separate copies of such documents to stockholders who write or call the Corporate Secretary of the Company at the following addressour corporate offices and telephone number: The Wendy’s Company, One Dave Thomas Boulevard, Dublin, Ohio 43017, Attention:number provided under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Secretary, Telephone: (614) 764-3100.Offices.”

Stockholders who wish to receive separate copies of the Company’s proxy materials in the future also may call or write to the Secretary of the Company at the above address and telephone number.number under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices.” Alternatively, if you and other stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of the Company’s proxy materials, or if you hold stock in more than one account and, in either case, you wish to receive only one copy of the Company’s proxy materials for your household, you may contact the Secretary of the Company at the above address and telephone number.number under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Offices.”

Annual Report on Form ANNUAL REPORTON FORM10-K

The Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017 is included in the 20152017 Annual Report to Stockholders that is being delivered, or made available electronically via the Internet, to stockholders with this Proxy Statement. Additional copies of the 20152017 Form10-K may be obtained free of charge by sending a written request to the Secretary of the Company at the following address: The Wendy’s Company, One Dave Thomas Boulevard, Dublin, Ohio 43017, Attention:address provided under the caption “Contacting the Secretary and Corporate Secretary.Offices.” Copies of the 20152017 Form10-K are also available on the Company’sour website atwww.aboutwendys.comwww.wendys.com/who-we-are.

CONTACTINGTHE SECRETARYAND CORPORATE OFFICES

By Order of the Board of Directors:

The Secretary of the Company is Mr. E. J. Wunsch. The mailing address and telephone number for our Secretary and corporate offices are:

The Wendy’s Company

Attention: Secretary of the Company

One Dave Thomas Boulevard

Dublin, Ohio   43017-5452

Telephone: (614)764-3100

By Order of the Board of Directors:

 

LOGO

E. J. WUNSCH

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

LOGO

DANA KLEIN

Assistant Secretary

Dublin, Ohio

April 11, 2016

20, 2018

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        81


ANNEX A

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION AND CALCULATION TABLES

AND DISCLOSURE REGARDINGNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The table below shows the specific adjustments applied in calculating adjusted EBITDA for purposes of the Company’s 2015 executive2017 annual incentive plan from the Company’s reported financial results for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.December 31, 2017. Included in the table is a reconciliation of The Wendy’s Companynet income to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations to The Wendy’s Company net income for fiscal 2015.2017.

Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA (2015 Executive(2017 Annual Incentive Plan) to

The Wendy’s Company Net Income

Twelve Month Period Ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017

(In Thousands; Unaudited)

 

Adjusted EBITDA (2015 Executive Incentive Plan)

  $408,497  

Less:

  

Adjustment attributable to the sale of the Company’s bakery operations *

   (16,021

Impact from final bonus calculation

   (53
  

 

 

 

The Wendy’s Company adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations

   392,423  

(Less) plus:

  

Depreciation and amortization

   (145,051

System optimization gains, net

   74,009  

Reorganization and realignment costs

   (21,910

Impairment of long-lived assets

   (25,001
  

 

 

 

Operating profit

   274,470  

Interest expense

   (86,067

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

   (7,295

Investment income, net

   52,214  

Other income, net

   806  
  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   234,128  

Provision for income taxes

   (94,149
  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

   139,979  

Discontinued operations:

  

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

   10,494  

Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes

   10,669  
  

 

 

 

Net income from discontinued operations

   21,163  
  

 

 

 

The Wendy’s Company net income

  $161,142  
  

 

 

 

 

Net income

$194,029

Benefit from income taxes

(93,010

Income before income taxes

101,019

Other income, net

(1,617

Investment income, net

(2,703

Interest expense

118,059

Operating profit

214,758

Plus (less):

Depreciation and amortization

125,687

System optimization losses, net

39,076

Reorganization and realignment costs

22,574

Impairment of long-lived assets

4,097

Adjusted EBITDA

$406,192

Plus (less):

Impact from final bonus calculation

Adjusted EBITDA (2017 Annual Incentive Plan)

$406,192

The table below shows the specific financial measures applied in calculating adjusted EBITDA margin from the Company’s reported financial results for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

Calculation of Adjusted EBITDA Margin

Twelve Month Period Ended December 31, 2017

(In Thousands; Unaudited)

 

*

The 2015 executive incentive plan as approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2015 included earnings attributable to the Company’s bakery operations. Due to the sale of the Company’s bakery operations in May 2015, the Company has presented its bakery results as “discontinued operations” in its consolidated financial statements and excluded its bakery results from its reported 2015 adjusted

Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations. In accordance with the terms of the 2015 executive incentive plan, an adjustment was made to account for the adjusted EBITDA impact resulting from the sale of the bakery and the presentation of the bakery results as “discontinued operations.”

  

$406,192

Total revenues

$1,223,408

Adjusted EBITDA margin

33.2

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        A-1


The table below provides a reconciliation of The Wendy’s Companynet income and diluted earnings per share to adjusted income and adjusted earnings per share from continuing operations to The Wendy’s Company net income and diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2015.2017.

Reconciliation of Adjusted Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share from

Continuing Operations to Net Income and Diluted Earnings Per Share

To Adjusted Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share

Twelve Month Period Ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017

(In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts; Unaudited)

 

     Per share  

Adjusted income and adjusted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $109,821     $     0.33  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Plus (less):

    

Dividend from Arby’s

   38,591     0.12  

System optimization gains, net

   32,187     0.10  

Impairment of long-lived assets

   (15,396   (0.05

Reorganization and realignment costs

   (13,492   (0.04

Depreciation of assets that will be replaced as part of the Image Activation initiative

   (5,300   (0.02

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

   (4,492   (0.01

Other than temporary loss on investment

   (1,940         (0.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

   30,158            0.10  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

   139,979     0.43  

Net income from discontinued operations

   21,163            0.06  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $  161,142     $     0.49  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

$194,029

Plus (less):

Depreciation of assets that will be replaced as part of the Image Activation initiative

630

System optimization losses, net

39,076

Reorganization and realignment costs

22,574

Impairment of long-lived assets

4,097

Total adjustments

66,377

Income tax impact on adjustments1

(11,275

Tax reform

(140,379

Total adjustments, net of income taxes

(85,277

Adjusted income

$108,752

Diluted earnings per share

$0.77

Total adjustments per share, net of income taxes

(0.34

Adjusted earnings per share

$0.43

Disclosure Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures

AdjustedThe table below shows the specific financial measures applied in calculating free cash flow from the Company’s reported financial results for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, respectively. Included in the table is a reconciliation of the Company’s net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow for 2017 and 2016.

Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

Twelve Month Periods Ended December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017

(In Thousands; Unaudited)

   

 

    2017    

 

     

 

    2016    

 

 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

   

 

$251,640

 

 

 

     

 

188,934

 

 

 

 

Less:

 

      

 

Capital expenditures

   81,710      150,023 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Free cash flow

   $169,930      38,911 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

DISCLOSURE REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The Company uses adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin and adjusted earnings per share, which exclude certain expenses netand benefits, as internal measures of certain benefits, are used by the CompanyCompany’s business operating performance and as performance measures for benchmarking against the Company’s peers and competitors,competitors. Adjusted EBITDA, systemwide sales and as an internal measurefree cash flow are also used by the Company in establishing performance goals for purposes of business operating performance.executive compensation. For fiscal 2015,2017, adjusted EBITDA (with certain modifications approved by the Performance Compensation Subcommittee of the Company’s Board of Directors) was used as a performance metric for the Company’s annual cash incentive plancompensation for senior executives, and adjusted earnings per share was used as a performance metric for the

1

The benefit from income taxes on “System optimization losses, net” was $598 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. The benefit from income taxes on “System optimization losses, net” includes the impact ofnon-deductible goodwill disposed of in connection with our system optimization initiative, adjustments related to prior year tax matters, changes to state deferred taxes and changes to valuation allowances on state net operating loss carryforwards. The benefit from income taxes on all other adjustments was calculated using an effective tax rate of 39.11% for the year ended December 31, 2017.

A-2        The Wendy’s Company 2018 Proxy Statement


Company’s long-term equity incentive plancompensation for senior executives. The Company believes adjusted EBITDA, andadjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted earnings per share and systemwide sales provide a meaningful perspective of the underlying operating performance of the Company’s current business.business and enables investors to better understand and evaluate the Company’s historical and prospective operating performance. Free cash flow is anon-GAAP financial measure that is used by the Company as an internal measure of liquidity. The Company believes that free cash flow is an important liquidity measure because it communicates how much cash flow is available for working capital needs or to be used for repurchasing shares, paying dividends, repaying or refinancing debt, financing possible acquisitions or investments or other uses of cash. Adjusted EBITDA, andadjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted earnings per share, free cash flow and systemwide sales are not recognized terms under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).GAAP, and the Company’s presentation of thesenon-GAAP financial measures in this Proxy Statement does not replace the presentation of the Company’s financial results in accordance with GAAP. Because all companies do not calculate adjusted EBITDA, andadjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted earnings per share, free cash flow and systemwide sales (and similarly titled financial measures) in the same way, those measures as used by other companies may not be consistent with the way The Wendy’s Company calculates such measures. Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share. The Company’s presentation of adjusted EBITDA andmargin, adjusted earnings per share, in this Proxy Statement doesfree cash flow and systemwide sales should not replace the presentationbe construed as substitutes for, or as better indicators of, the Company’s financial results in accordance with GAAP, and adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share should not be considered as alternative measures of net income or earnings per share.

A-2        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


ANNEX B

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

THE WENDY’S COMPANY

(Originally incorporated on May 6, 1994

under the name Triarc Merger Corporation).

ARTICLE I

NAME

The name of the corporation shall be The Wendy’s Company (the “Corporation”).

ARTICLE II

ADDRESS; REGISTERED AGENT

The address of the Corporation’s registered office is 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, State of Delaware 19808; and its registered agent at such address is Corporation Service Company.

ARTICLE III

PURPOSES

The purpose of the Corporation is, either directly or through its subsidiaries, to engage in the restaurant business, including the ownership, operation and franchising of restaurants, and any reasonable extension or expansion thereof and any business, act or activity that is reasonably related, complementary, incidental or ancillary to the restaurant business, including the ownership, operation and franchising of restaurants, or any reasonable extension or expansion thereof (the “Restaurant Business”); provided, that the foregoing shall not prohibit the Corporation, either directly or through its subsidiaries, from (iA) acquiring, directly or indirectly, any person or entity that is engaged in activities otherperformance than the Restaurant Business so long as the Restaurant Business of such acquired person or entity, in each case together with its subsidiaries, generated a majority of the consolidated revenue, consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization or consolidated operating income of such person or entity, together with its subsidiaries, during thetwelve12-month period preceding such acquisition, (iiB) continuing to own or operate such acquired person or entity or its assets and business operations following the acquisition of such person or entity, provided that the Corporation shall use good faith efforts to divest itself of the portion of the acquired person not engaged in the Restaurant Business withintwenty four24 months of the closing of the acquisition, or (iiiC) continuing to own, manage and administer any assets that are not Restaurant Business assets that are owned by, or otherwise reflected on the books and records of the Corporation or its subsidiaries as of the effective date of thisamendment of theAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”).most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

ARTICLE IV

CAPITALIZATION

SECTION 1.    Capital Stock. The total number of shares of all classes of stock (the “Capital Stock”) which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue isone billion six hundred million (1,600,000,000) of which:

(aA)    one billion five hundred million (1,500,000,000) shall be shares of Common Stock, par value ten cents ($.10) per share (the “Common Stock”); and

(bB)    one hundred million (100,000,000) shall be shares of Preferred Stock, par value ten cents ($.10) per share (the “Preferred Stock”).

Subject to the provisions of this Certificate of Incorporation and except as otherwise provided by law, the stock of the Corporation, regardless of class, may be issued for such consideration and for such corporate purposes as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine.

A statement of the powers, preferences, and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, in respect of each class of stock is as set forth below:

A.SECTION 2.    Voting Power of Common Stock. The holders of Common Stock shall possess voting power for the election of directors of the Corporation and for all other corporate purposes, each share of Common Stock being entitled to one vote on each matter properly submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their vote.

B. Preferred Stock.

 

        The Wendy’s Company 20162018 Proxy Statement        B-1A-3


SECTION13.    Issuance in SeriesPreferred Stock. The shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series of any number of shares, provided that the aggregate number of shares issued and not cancelled of any and all such series shall not exceed the total number of shares of Preferred Stock hereinabove authorized, and with distinctive serial designations, all as shall hereafter be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such shares of Preferred Stock from time to time adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant to authority so to do which is hereby vested in the Board of Directors. Each series of shares of Preferred Stock (aA) may have such voting powers, full or limited, or may be without voting powers; (bB) may be subject to redemption at such time or times and at such prices; (cC) may be entitled to receive dividends (which may be cumulative or non-cumulative) at such rate or rates, on such conditions and at such times, and payable in preference to, or in such relation to, the dividends payable on any other class or classes or series of stock; (dD) may have such rights upon the dissolution of, or upon any distribution of the assets of, the Corporation; (eE) may be made convertible into or exchangeable for, shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of the same or any other class or classes of shares of the Corporation at such price or prices or at such rates of exchange and with such adjustments; (fF) may be entitled to the benefit of a sinking fund to be applied to the purchase or redemption of shares of such series in such amount or amounts; and (gG) may be entitled to the benefit of conditions and restrictions upon the creation of indebtedness of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, upon the issue of any additional shares (including additional shares of such series or of any other series) and upon the payment of dividends or the making of other distributions on, and the purchase, redemption or other acquisition by the Corporation or any Subsidiary of, any outstanding shares of the Corporation and may have such other relative, participating, optional or other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof; all as shall be stated in said resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such shares of Preferred Stock. The Corporation shall take all such actions as are necessary to cause shares of Preferred Stock of any series that have been redeemed (whether through the operation of a sinking fund or otherwise) or that if convertible or exchangeable, have been converted into or exchanged for shares of any other class or classes to have the status of authorized and unissued shares of Preferred Stock of the same series and may be reissued as a part of the series of which they were originally a part or may be reclassified and reissued as part of a new series of shares of Preferred Stock to be created by resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors or as part of any other series of shares of Preferred Stock, all subject to the conditions or restrictions on issuance set forth in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issue of any series of shares of Preferred Stock. No Preferred Stock of any series may be issued to anyAffiliateaffiliate of the Corporation unless Preferred Stock of that series is offered ratably to all holders of Common Stock of the Corporation; provided that, the foregoing shall not apply if (i) the delay in complying with the obligation to offer the Preferred Stock ratably to the holders of the Common Stock would seriously jeopardize the financial viability of the Corporation and (ii) reliance by the Corporation on the exception in this proviso is expressly approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

SECTION24.    No Vote Unless Expressly Provided or Required by Law; Dividends. Subject to the provisions of any applicable law or of the by-laws of the Corporation (the“By-laws”), as from time to time amended, with respect to the closing of the stock transfer books or the fixing of a record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote and except as otherwise provided by law, in this Certificate of Incorporation or by the Certificate of Designation relating to the issue of any series of shares of Preferred Stock, the holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock shall not possess voting power for the election of directors or for any other purposes. Except as otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or by the Certificate of Designation relating to the issue of any series of shares of Preferred Stock, the holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled, to the exclusion of the holders of shares of Preferred Stock of any and all series, to receive such dividends as from time to time may be declared by the Board of Directors.

C.SECTION 5.    Definitions. As used herein the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(aA)    “Person” shall mean any individual, corporation, partnership, firm, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, governmental or regulatory body or other entity.

(bB)    “Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation whose shares of capital stock having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the directors of such corporation are owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation.

ARTICLE V

BOARD OF DIRECTORS; STOCKHOLDERS MEETINGS

SECTION 1.    The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors.

SECTION 2.    The Board of Directors shall consist of not less than seven(7) nor more thanfifteen (15) persons, the exact number to be fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority

B-2        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


of directors then in office; provided, however, that such maximum number may be increased from time to time to reflect the rights of holders of Preferred Stock to elect directors in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Incorporation or of the Certificate of Designation pursuant to which any class or series of Preferred Stock is issued or to the extent provided in any resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issuance of any class or series of Preferred Stock pursuant to Article IV of this Certificate of Incorporation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Certificate of Incorporation, any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or of any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all of the members of the Board of Directors or the committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in writing, and the writing or writings are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors or committee. Members of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof designated by the Board of Directors, may participate in a meeting of the Board of Directors, or of such committee, as the case may be, by means of conference telephone or similar communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other, and participation in a meeting in such a manner shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.

SECTION 3.    Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of Preferred Stock, any vacancy in the Board of Directors caused by death, resignation, removal, retirement, disqualification or any other cause (including an increase in the number of directors) may be filled solely by resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, whether or not such majority constitutes less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Any new director elected to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors will serve for the remainder of the full term of that director for which the vacancy occurred. No decrease in the size of the Board of Directors shall have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director.

SECTION 4.    Except as otherwise provided by law or by this Certificate of Incorporation, a majority of the directors in office at the time of a duly assembled meeting shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and the act of a majority of the directors present at such meeting shall be the act of the Board of Directors.

SECTION 5.    Stockholder Business. (A) At an annual meeting of the stockholders, only business (other than business relating to the nomination or election of directors which is governed bySectionSections 6 and 7) that has been properly brought before the stockholder meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 5 shall be conducted. To be properly brought before an annual meeting of stockholders, such business must be brought before the meeting (i) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof or(ii) by a stockholder who (a) was a stockholder of record of the Corporation when the notice required by this Section 5 is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation and at the time of the meeting, (b) is entitled to vote at the meeting and (c) complies with the notice and other provisions of this Section 5. Section 5(A)(ii) is the exclusive means by which a stockholder may bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders, except (x) with respect to nominations or elections of directors which is governed bySectionSections 6 and7 and (y) with respect to proposals where the stockholder proposing such business has notified the Corporation of such stockholder’s intent to present the proposals at an annual meeting in compliance with Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and such proposals have been included in a proxy statement that has been prepared by the Corporation to solicit proxies for such annual meeting, in which case the notice requirements of this Section 5 shall be deemed satisfied with respect to such proposals. Any business brought before a meeting in accordance with Section 5(A)(ii) is referred to as “Stockholder Business.”

(B)    At any annual meeting of stockholders, all proposals of Stockholder Business must be made by timely written notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder of record of the Corporation (the “Notice of Business”) and must otherwise be a proper matter for stockholder action. To be timely, the Notice of Business must be delivered personally or mailed to, and received at the principal executive office of the Corporation (the “Office of the Corporation”), addressed to the Secretary of the Corporation, by no earlier than 120 days and no later than 90 days before the first anniversary of the date of the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that if (i) the annual meeting of stockholders is advanced by more than 30 days, or delayed by more than 60 days, from the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders or (ii) no annual meeting was held during the prior year (a) no earlier than 120 days before such annual meeting and (b) no later than the later of 90 days before such annual meeting and the tenth day after the day on which the notice of such annual meeting was made by mail or Public Disclosure. In no event shall an adjournment, postponement or deferral, or Public Disclosure of an adjournment, postponement or deferral, of a stockholder meeting commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of the Notice of Business.

(C)    The Notice of Business must set forth:

(i)    the name and record address of each stockholder proposing Stockholder Business (the “Proponent”), as they appear on the Corporation’s books;

(ii)    the name and address of any Stockholder Associated Person;

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        B-3


(iii)    as to each Proponent and any Stockholder Associated Person, (a) the class or series and number of shares of stock directly or indirectly held of record and beneficially by the Proponent or Stockholder Associated Person, (b) the date such shares of stock were acquired, (c) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding, direct or indirect, with respect to such Stockholder Business between or among the Proponent, any Stockholder Associated Person or any others (including their names) acting in concert with any of the foregoing, (d) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into, directly or indirectly, as of the date of the Proponent’s notice by, or on behalf of, the Proponent or any Stockholder Associated Person, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of the Proponent or any Stockholder Associated Person with respect to shares of stock of the Corporation (a “Derivative”), (e) a description in reasonable detail of any proxy (including revocable proxies), contract, arrangement, understanding or other relationship pursuant to which the Proponent or Stockholder Associated Person has a right to vote any shares of stock of the Corporation, (f) any rights to dividends on the stock of the Corporation owned beneficially by the Proponent or Stockholder Associated Person that are separated or separable from the underlying stock of the Corporation, (g) any proportionate interest in stock of the Corporation or Derivatives held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which the Proponent or Stockholder Associated Person is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner and (h) any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that the Proponent or Stockholder Associated Person is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of stock of the Corporation or Derivatives thereof, if any, as of the date of such notice. The information specified in Section 5(C)(i) to (iii) is referred to herein as “Stockholder Information”;

(iv)    a representation that each Proponent is a holder of record of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such Stockholder Business;

(v)    a brief description of the Stockholder Business desired to be brought before the annual meeting, the text of the proposal (including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, if such business includes a proposal to amend the By-laws, the language of the proposed amendment) and the reasons for conducting such Stockholder Business at the meeting;

(vi)    any material interest of each Proponent and any Stockholder Associated Person in such Stockholder Business;

(vii)    a representation as to whether the Proponent intends (a) to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Corporation’s outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt such Stockholder Business or (b) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of such Stockholder Business;

(viii)    all other information that would be required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) if the Proponents or Stockholder Associated Persons were participants in a solicitation subject to Section 14 of the Exchange Act; and

(ix)    a representation that the Proponents shall provide any other information reasonably requested by the Corporation.

(D)    The Proponents shall also provide any other information reasonably requested by the Corporation within ten business days after such request.

(E)    In addition, the Proponent shall further update and supplement the information provided to the Corporation in the Notice of Business or upon the Corporation’s request pursuant to Section 5(D) as needed, so that such information shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is the later of ten business days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Such update and supplement must be delivered personally or mailed to, and received at the Office of the Corporation, addressed to the Secretary of the Corporation, by no later than five business days after the record date for the meeting (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date), and not later than seven business days before the date for the meeting (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten business days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof).

(F)    The person presiding over the meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting, that business was not properly brought before the meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 5, and, if he or she should so determine, he or she shall so declare to the meeting and any such business not properly brought before the meeting shall not be transacted.

B-4        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


(G)    If the Proponent (or a qualified representative of the Proponent) does not appear at the meeting of stockholders to present the Stockholder Business such business shall not be transacted, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Corporation. For purposes of this Section 5, to be considered a qualified representative of the stockholder, a person must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner of such stockholder or must be authorized by a writing executed by such stockholder or an electronic transmission delivered by such stockholder to act for such stockholder as proxy at the meeting of stockholders and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission, at the meeting of stockholders.

(H)    “Beneficial Ownership” shall be determined, and a Person shall be the “Beneficial Owner” of all securities which such Person is deemed to own beneficially, pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.

(I)    “Control” (including the terms “controlling,” “controlled by” and “under common control with”) means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.

(J)    “Public Disclosure” of any date or other information means disclosure thereof by a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Services, Associated Press or comparable U.S. national news service or in a document publicly filed by the Corporation with the SEC pursuant to Sections 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

(K)    “Stockholder Associated Person” means with respect to any stockholder, (i) any other beneficial owner of stock of the Corporation that are owned by such stockholder and (ii) any person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the stockholder or such beneficial owner.

(L)    Nothing in this Section 5 shall be deemed to affect any rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock of the Corporation pursuant to any applicable provision of the Certificate of Incorporation.

SECTION 6.    Director Nominations. (A) Only persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 6or Section 7 of this Article V are eligible for election as directors.

(B)    Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may only be made at a meeting properly called for the election of directors and only (i) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof or, (ii) by a stockholder who (a) was a stockholder of record of the Corporation when the notice required by this Section 6 is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation and at the time of the meeting, (b) is entitled to vote for the election of directors at the meeting and (c) complies with the notice and other provisions of this Section 6 or (iii) in the case of stockholder nominations to be included in the Corporation’s proxy statement for an annual meeting of stockholders, by a stockholder or group of stockholders who meets the requirements of and complies with Section 7 of this Article V. Section 6(B)(ii)isand (iii) are the exclusive means by which a stockholder may nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors. Persons nominated in accordance with Section 6(B)(ii) are referred to as “Stockholder Nominees.” A stockholder nominatingpersonsStockholder Nominees for election to the Board of Directors is referred to as the “Nominating Stockholder.”

(C)    All nominations of Stockholder Nominees must be made by timely written notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder of record of the Corporation (the “Notice of Nomination”). To be timely, the Notice of Nomination must be delivered personally or mailed to and received at the Office of the Corporation, addressed to the attention of the Secretary of the Corporation, by the following dates:

(i)    in the case of the nomination of a Stockholder Nominee for election to the Board of Directors at an annual meeting of stockholders, no earlier than 120 days and no later than 90 days before the first anniversary of the date of the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that if (a) the annual meeting of stockholders is advanced by more than 30 days, or delayed by more than 60 days, from the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders or (b) no annual meeting was held during the prior year, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received (1) no earlier than 120 days before such annual meeting and (2) no later than the later of 90 days before such annual meeting and the tenth day after the day on which the notice of such annual meeting was made by mail or Public Disclosure; and

(ii)    in the case of the nomination of a Stockholder Nominee for election to the Board of Directors at a special meeting of stockholders, no earlier than 120 days before and no later than the later of 90 days before such special meeting and the tenth day after the day on which the notice of such special meeting was made by mail or Public Disclosure.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        B-5


(D)    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, if the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors at a meeting of stockholders is increased and there is no Public Disclosure by the Corporation naming the nominees for the additional directorships at least 100 days before the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a Notice of Nomination shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for the additional directorships, if it shall be delivered personally and received at the Office of the Corporation, addressed to the attention of the Secretary of the Corporation, no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such Public Disclosure is first made by the Corporation.

(E)    InWith respect to the giving of notice in the time period required by Section 6(C) of this Article V, in no event shall an adjournment, postponement or deferral, or Public Disclosure of an adjournment, postponement or deferral, of an annual or special meeting commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of the Notice of Nomination.

(F)    The Notice of Nomination shall set forth:

(i)    the Stockholder Information with respect to each Nominating Stockholder and Stockholder Associated Person;

(ii)    a representation that each stockholder nominating a Stockholder Nominee is a holder of record of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such nomination;

(iii)    all information regarding each Stockholder Nominee and Stockholder Associated Person that would be required to be disclosed in a solicitation of proxies subject to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, the written consent of each Stockholder Nominee to being named in a proxy statement as a nominee and to serve if elected and a completed signed questionnaire, representation and agreement required by Section76(L);

(iv)    a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships, between or among a Nominating Stockholder, Stockholder Associated Person or their respective associates, or others acting in concert therewith, including all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K if the Nominating Stockholder, Stockholder Associated Person or any person acting in concert therewith, were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the Stockholder Nominee were a director or executive of such registrant;

(v)    a representation as to whether the Nominating Stockholder intends (a) to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Corporation’s outstanding capital stock required to approve the nomination or (b) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of such nomination;

(vi)    all other information that would be required to be filed with the SEC if the Nominating Stockholder and Stockholder Associated Person were participants in a solicitation subject to Section 14 of the Exchange Act; and

(vii)    a representation that the Nominating Stockholder shall provide any other information reasonably requested by the Corporation.

(G)    The Nominating Stockholder shall also provide any other information reasonably requested by the Corporation within ten business days after such request.

(H)    In addition, the Nominating Stockholder shall further update and supplement the information provided to the Corporation in the Notice of Nomination or upon the Corporation’s request pursuant to Section 6(G) as needed, so that such information shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten business days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Such update and supplement must be delivered personally or mailed to, and received at the Office of the Corporation, addressed to the Secretary of the Corporation, by no later than five business days after the record date for the meeting (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date), and not later than seven business days before the date for the meeting (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten business days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof).

(I)    The person presiding over the meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting, that the nominationof a Stockholder Nominee by the Nominating Stockholder was not made in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 6, and, if he or she should so determine, he or she shall so declare to the meeting and the defective nomination shall be disregarded.

B-6        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


(J)    If thestockholderNominating Stockholder (or a qualified representative of thestockholderNominating Stockholder) does not appear at the applicable stockholder meeting to nominate the Stockholder Nominees, such nomination shall be disregarded and such business shall not be transacted, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Corporation. For purposes of this Section 6, to be considered a qualified representative of thestockholderNominating Stockholder, a person must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner of suchstockholderNominating Stockholder or must be authorized by a writing executed by suchstockholderNominating Stockholder or an electronic transmission delivered by suchstockholderNominating Stockholder to act for suchstockholderNominating Stockholder as proxy at the meeting of stockholders and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission, at the meeting of stockholders.

(K)    Nothing in this Section 6 shall be deemed to affect any rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock of the Corporation pursuant to any applicable provision of the Certificate of Incorporation.

SECTION 7.(L)To be eligible to be anomineeStockholder Nominee for election or reelection as a director, a person must deliver (in accordance with the time periods prescribed for delivery of notice underthis Section 6) to the Secretary at the Office of the Corporation a written questionnaire with respect to the background and qualification of such person and the background of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made (which questionnaire shall be provided by the Secretary of the Corporation upon written request) and awritten representation andagreement (in the form provided by the Secretary of the Corporation upon written request) that such person (A) is not and will not become a party to (i) any agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how such person, if elected as a director, will act or vote on any issue or question (a “Voting Commitment”) that has not been disclosed to the Corporation or (ii) any Voting Commitment that could limit or interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director, with such person’s fiduciary duties under applicable law, (B) is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity other than the Corporation with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that has not been disclosed therein and (C) in such person’s individual capacity and on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, would be in compliance, if elected as a director, and will comply with all applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading and other policies and guidelines of the Corporation.

SECTION 7.    Proxy Access for Director Nominations.

(A)    Information to be Included in the Corporation’s Proxy. Subject to the provisions of this Section 7, for an annual meeting of stockholders, the Corporation shall include in its proxy statement and in its form of proxy for such annual meeting, in addition to any persons nominated for election by or at the direction of the Board of Directors (or any committee thereof), the name and the Required Information (as defined in Section 7(B) of this Article V) of any person nominated for election to the Board of Directors who satisfies the eligibility requirements in this Section 7 (a “Proxy Access Nominee”) and who is identified in a proper written notice (the “Proxy Access Notice”) that complies with, and is timely delivered pursuant to, this Section 7 by an Eligible Stockholder (as defined in Section 7(C) of this Article V), who expressly elects at the time of delivering the Proxy Access Notice to have such Proxy Access Nominee included in the Corporation’s proxy materials. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 7, the Corporation may omit from its proxy materials any information or Supporting Statement (as defined in Section 7(I) of this Article V) that it, in good faith, believes would violate any applicable law or regulation.

(B)    Definition of Required Information. For the purposes of this Section 7, the “Required Information” that the Corporation shall include in its proxy statement is (i) the information concerning the Proxy Access Nominee and the Eligible Stockholder that is required to be disclosed in the Corporation’s proxy statement by the applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and (ii) if the Eligible Stockholder so elects, a Supporting Statement. Nothing in this Section 7 shall limit the Corporation’s ability to solicit against or for, and include in its proxy materials its own statements relating to, any Eligible Stockholder or Proxy Access Nominee.

(C)    Definition of Eligible Stockholder. For the purposes of this Section 7, an “Eligible Stockholder” is a stockholder or group of no more than 25 stockholders (counting as one stockholder, for this purpose, any two or more funds that are part of the sameQualifying Fund Group (as defined in Section 7(D) of this Article V)) that (i) has owned (as defined in Section 7(E) of this Article V) continuously for at least three years prior to the date the Proxy Access Notice is received at the Office of the Corporation (the “Minimum Holding Period”) a number of shares of stock of the Corporation that represents at least 3% of the voting power of all shares of stock of the Corporation issued and

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        B-7


outstanding and entitled to vote in the election of directors as of the most recent date for which such amount is set forth in any Public Disclosure made by the Corporation prior to the date the Proxy Access Notice is received at the Office of the Corporation (the “Required Shares”), (ii) continues to own the Required Shares through the date of the annual meeting of stockholders and (iii) satisfies all other requirements of, and complies with all applicable procedures set forth in, this Section 7. Whenever the Eligible Stockholder consists of a group of stockholders (including a group of funds that are part of the same Qualifying Fund Group), each provision in this Section 7 that requires the Eligible Stockholder to provide any written statements, representations, undertakings, agreements or other instruments or to meet any other conditions shall be deemed to require each such stockholder (including each individual fund) that is a member of such group to provide such statements, representations, undertakings, agreements or other instruments and to meet such other conditions (except that the members of such group may aggregate the shares that each member has owned continuously for the Minimum Holding Period in order to meet the 3% ownership requirement of the “Required Shares” definition). No person may be a member of more than one group of stockholders constituting an Eligible Stockholder with respect to any annual meeting of stockholders, and if any person purports to be a member of more than one group, it shall only be deemed to be a member of the group of stockholders that has the largest ownership position (as reflected in the applicable Proxy Access Notice). A record holder acting on behalf of a beneficial owner will not be counted separately as a stockholder with respect to the shares owned by beneficial owners on whose behalf such record holder has been directed in writing to act, but each such beneficial owner will be counted separately, subject to the other provisions of this Section 7(C), for purposes of determining the number of stockholders whose holdings may be considered part of an Eligible Stockholder’s holdings. For the avoidance of doubt, Required Shares will qualify as such, if and only if, the beneficial owner of such shares as of the date of the Proxy Access Notice has itself beneficially owned such shares continuously for the Minimum Holding Period and through the date of the annual meeting of stockholders (in addition to the other applicable requirements being met).

(D)    Definition of Qualifying Fund Group. For the purposes of this Section 7, a “Qualifying Fund Group” means two or more funds that are (i) under common management and investment control, (ii) under common management and funded primarily by the same employer or (iii) a “group of investment companies,” as such term is defined in Section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

(E)    Definition of Ownership. For the purposes of this Section 7, a stockholder shall be deemed to “own” only those outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation as to which the stockholder possesses both (i) the full voting and investment rights pertaining to such shares and (ii) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares; provided that the number of shares calculated in accordance with the foregoing shall not include any shares (i) sold by such stockholder or any of itsaffiliates in any transaction that has not been settled or closed, (ii) borrowed by such stockholder or any of its affiliates for any purpose or purchased by such stockholder or any of its affiliates pursuant to an agreement to resell or (iii) subject to any option, warrant, forward contract, swap, contract of sale, other derivative or similar agreement entered into by such stockholder or any of its affiliates, whether any such instrument or agreement is to be settled with shares or with cash based on the notional amount or value of outstanding shares of the Corporation, in any such case which instrument or agreement has, or is intended to have, the purpose or effect of (a) reducing in any manner, to any extent or at any time in the future, such stockholder’s or any of its affiliates’ full right to vote or direct the voting of any such shares, or (b) hedging, offsetting or altering to any degree gain or loss arising from the full economic ownership of such shares by such stockholder or any of its affiliates. A stockholder shall “own” shares held in the name of a nominee or other intermediary so long as the stockholder retains the right to instruct how the shares are voted with respect to the election of directors and the right to direct the disposition thereof and possesses the full economic interest in the shares. A stockholder’s ownership of shares shall be deemed to continue during any period in which the stockholder has: (i) delegated any voting power by means of a proxy, power of attorney or other instrument or arrangement that is revocable at any time by the stockholder without condition or (ii) loaned such shares; provided that the stockholder has the power to recall such loaned shares on not more than five business days’ notice and has recalled such loaned shares as of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. The terms “owned,” “owning” and other variations of the word “own” shall have correlative meanings. For the purposes of this Section 7, “affiliate” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto under the Exchange Act.

(F)    Notice Period. To be timely under this Section 7, the Proxy Access Notice must be received by the Secretary at the Office of the Corporation no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days before the first anniversary of the filing date of the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days, or delayed by more than 60 days after the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders, notice by the

B-8        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


EligibleStockholder to be timely must be so delivered (i) no earlier than 120 days before such annual meeting and (ii) no later than the later of 90 days before such annual meeting and the tenth day after the day on which the notice of such annualmeeting was made by mail or Public Disclosure. In no event shall an adjournment, postponement or deferral, or Public Disclosure of an adjournment, postponement or deferral, of an annual meeting of stockholders commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of the Proxy Access Notice pursuant to this Section 7.

(G)    Form of Notice. To be in proper written form, the Proxy Access Notice must include or be accompanied by the following:

(i)    a written statement by the Eligible Stockholder certifying as to the number of shares it owns and has owned continuously for the Minimum Holding Period, and the Eligible Stockholder’s agreement to provide (a) within five business days following the later of the record date for the annual meeting of stockholders or the date on which notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, a writtenstatement by the Eligible Stockholder certifying as to the number of shares it owns and has owned continuously through the record date and (b) prompt notice if the Eligible Stockholder ceases to own a number of shares at least equal to the Required Shares prior to the date of the annual meeting;

(ii)    if the Eligible Stockholder is not a record holder of the Required Shares, proof that the Eligible Stockholder owns, and has owned continuously for the Minimum Holding Period, the Required Shares, in a form that would be deemed by the Corporation to be acceptable pursuant to Rule 14a-8(b)(2) under the Exchange Act (or any successor rule) for purposes of a shareholder proposal;

(iii)    a copy of the Schedule 14N that has been or is concurrently being filed with the SEC as required by Rule 14a-18 under the Exchange Act;

(iv)    a description of (a) any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf the Eligible Stockholder the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of the Eligible Stockholder with respect to shares of stock of the Corporation and (b) any proxy (including revocable proxies), contract, arrangement, understanding or other relationship pursuant to which the Eligible Stockholder has a right to vote any shares of stock of the Corporation;

(v)    as to each Proxy Access Nominee, (a) an executed agreement, in a form deemed satisfactory by the Board of Directors or its designee (which form shall be provided by the Corporation reasonably promptly upon written request of a stockholder), pursuant to which such Proxy Access Nominee (1) consents to being named in the Corporation’s proxy statement and form of proxy (and agrees not to be named in any other person’s proxy statement or form of proxy) as a nominee and to serving as a director of the Corporation if elected, (2) represents and agrees that he or she is not and will not become a party to a Voting Commitment that has not been disclosed to the Corporation, (3) represents and agrees that he or she is not and will not become a party to a Voting Commitment that could reasonably be expected to limit or interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director, with his or her fiduciary duties under applicable law, (4) represents and agrees that he or she is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity other than the Corporation with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that has not been disclosed to the Corporation, and (5) represents and agrees that such Proxy Access Nominee would be in compliance, if elected as a director of the Corporation, and will comply with, applicable law and all applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, corporate opportunities, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of the Corporation relating to such Proxy Access Nominee’s Board membership; (b) a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during thepast three years, and any other material relationships, between or among the Eligible Stockholder, such Proxy Access Nominee or their respective associates, or others acting in concert therewith, including all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K if the Eligible Stockholder or its affiliates or any person acting in concert therewith were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the person were a director or executive of such registrant; and (c) any other information relating to the Proxy Access Nominee that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with the solicitation of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        B-9


(vi)    an executed agreement, in a form deemed satisfactory by the Board of Directors or its designee (which form shall be provided by the Corporation reasonably promptly upon written request of a stockholder), pursuant to which the Eligible Stockholder (a) represents that it intends to continue to hold the Required Shares through the date of the annual meeting of stockholders; (b) represents that it acquired the Required Shares in the ordinary course of business and not with the intent to change or influence control of the Corporation, and does not presently have such intent; (c) represents and agrees that it has not nominated and will not nominate for election to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting of stockholders any person other than the Proxy Access Nominee(s) it is nominating pursuant to this Section 7; (d) represents and agrees that it is not currently engaged as of the date of the agreement, and will not engage, in, and is not currently as of the date of the agreement, and will not be, a “participant” in another person’s, “solicitation” within the meaning of Rule 14a-1(l) under the Exchange Act in support of the election of any individual as a director at the annual meeting other than its Proxy Access Nominee(s) or a nominee of the Board of Directors; (e) represents and agrees that it has not distributed and will not distribute to any stockholder of the Corporation any form of proxy for the annual meeting other than the form distributed by the Corporation; (f) represents and agrees that it is currently in compliance as of the date of the agreement, and will comply, with all laws and regulations (including, without limitation, Rule 14a-9(a) under the Exchange Act) applicable to solicitations and the use, if any, of soliciting material in connection with the annual meeting; (g) agrees to assume all liability stemming from any legal or regulatory violation arising out of the Eligible Stockholder’s communications with the stockholders of the Corporation or out of the information that the Eligible Stockholder provided to the Corporation, in each case, in connection with the nomination or election of Proxy Access Nominee(s) at the annual meeting; (h) agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Corporation and each of its directors, officers and employees individually against any liability, loss or damages in connection with any threatened or pending action, suit or proceeding, whether legal, administrative or investigative, against the Corporation or any of its directors, officers or employees arising out of any legal or regulatory violation referenced in clause (g) above or any failure or alleged failure of the Eligible Stockholder or its Proxy Access Nominee(s) to comply with, or any breach or alleged breach by the Eligible Stockholder or its Proxy Access Nominee(s) of, therequirements of this Section 7; and (i) agrees to file with the SEC any written solicitation of the stockholders of the Corporation relating to the meeting at which its Proxy Access Nominee(s) will be nominated, regardless of whether any such filing is required under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act or whether any exemption from filing is available for such solicitation or other communication under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act;

(vii)    in the case of a nomination by a group of stockholders together constituting an Eligible Stockholder, the designation by all group members of one member of the group that is authorized to receive communications, notices and inquiries from the Corporation and to act on behalf of all members of the group with respect to all matters relating to the nomination under this Section 7 (including withdrawal of the nomination); and

(viii)    in the case of a nomination by a group of stockholders together constituting an Eligible Stockholder in which two or more funds that are part of the same Qualifying Fund Group are counted as one stockholder for purposes of qualifying as an Eligible Stockholder, documentation reasonably satisfactory to the Corporation that demonstrates that the funds are part of the same Qualifying Fund Group.

(H)    Additional Required Information. In addition to the information required pursuant to Section 7(G) of this Article V or any other provision of this Certificate of Incorporation, (i) the Corporation may require any proposed Proxy Access Nominee to furnish any other information (a) that may reasonably be required by the Corporation to determine whether the Proxy Access Nominee would be independent under the Independence Standards (as defined in Section 7(L) of this Article V), (b) that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such Proxy Access Nominee, (c) that may reasonably be required by the Corporation to determine the eligibility of such Proxy Access Nominee to serve as a director of the Corporation or (d) as may otherwise be reasonably requested, and (ii) the Corporation may require the Eligible Stockholder to furnish any other information that may reasonably be required by the Corporation to verify the Eligible Stockholder’s continuous ownership of the Required Shares for the Minimum Holding Period or compliance with this Section 7.

(I)    Supporting Statement. For each of its Proxy Access Nominees, the Eligible Stockholder may, at its option, provide to the Secretary of the Corporation, at the time the Proxy Access Notice is provided, one written statement, not to exceed 500 words, in support of such Proxy Access Nominee’s candidacy (a “Supporting Statement”). Only one Supporting Statement may be submitted by an Eligible Stockholder (including any group of stockholders together constituting an Eligible Stockholder) for each Proxy Access Nominee.

B-10        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


(J)    Permitted Number of Proxy Access Nominees.

(i)    The maximum number of Proxy Access Nominees nominated by all Eligible Stockholders that will appear in the Corporation’s proxy materials with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, shall not exceed 20%, or 25% (if the number of directors serving on the Board of Directors is less than ten), of the number of directors in office as of the last day on which a Proxy Access Notice may be delivered pursuant to this Section 7 with respect to the annual meeting, or if such amount is not a whole number, the closest whole number below 20% or 25%, as applicable (such number, as it may be adjusted pursuant to this Section 7(J), the “Permitted Number”); provided, however, that the Permitted Number shall be reduced by (a) the number of individuals who will be included in the Corporation’s proxy materials as nominees unopposed or recommended by the Board of Directors pursuant to an agreement, arrangement or other understanding with a stockholder or group of stockholders (other than any such agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with an acquisition of stock from the Corporation by such stockholder or group of stockholders), other than any such individual who at the time of the annual meeting shall have served as a director continuously as a nominee of the Board of Directors for at least two annual terms, (b) the number of individuals who were previously elected to the Board of Directors as Proxy Access Nominees at any of the preceding two annual meetings of stockholders pursuant to this Section 7 and who are re-nominated for election at such annual meeting by the Board of Directors and (c) the number of Proxy Access Nominees who were qualified for inclusion in the Corporation’s proxy materials for the current annual meeting of stockholders whom the Board of Directors decides to nominate for election to the Board of Directors.

(ii)    If one or more vacancies on the Board of Directors for any reason occur after the deadline in Section 7(F) of this Article V for delivery of the Proxy Access Notice and the Board of Directors resolves to reduce the size of the Board of Directors in connection therewith, the maximum number of Proxy Access Nominees that may be nominated by all Eligible Stockholders pursuant to this Section 7 shall be calculated based on the number of directors in office so reduced. If the number of Proxy Access Nominees submitted by Eligible Stockholders pursuant to this Section 7 exceeds this maximum number, each Eligible Stockholder will select one Proxy Access Nominee for inclusion in the Corporation’s proxy materials until the maximum number is reached, going in order of the number (largest to smallest) of shares of the Corporation each Eligible Stockholder disclosed as owned in its respective Proxy Access Notice submitted to the Corporation. If the maximum number is not reached after each Eligible Stockholder has selected one Proxy Access Nominee, this selection process will continue as many times as necessary, following the same order each time, until the maximum number is reached. Following such determination, if any Proxy Access Nominee who satisfies the eligibility requirements in this Section 7 thereafter is nominated by the Board of Directors, ceases to satisfy the eligibility requirements in this Section 7, withdraws his or her nomination or becomes unwilling to serve on the Board, no other nominee or nominees shall be included in the Corporation’s proxy materials or otherwise submitted for director election in substitution thereof with respect to the annual meeting of stockholders.

(iii)    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 7, the Corporation shall not be required to include any Proxy Access Nominees in its proxy materials pursuant to this Section 7 for any annual meeting of stockholders for which the Secretary of the Corporation receives notice that a stockholder intends to nominate one or more persons for election to the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 6 of this Article V.

(K)    Correction of Defects. No information or communication provided by an Eligible Stockholder or a Proxy Access Nominee to the Corporation or its stockholders in connection with the nomination or election of Proxy Access Nominee(s) at the annual meeting shall include any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. If any such information or communications includes any such untrue statement or omission, such Eligible Stockholder or Proxy Access Nominee, as the case may be, shall promptly notify the Secretary of the Corporation of any defect in such previously provided information and of the information that is required to correct any such defect; it being understood that providing such notification shall not be deemed to limit the rights or remedies available to the Corporation relating to any such defect.

(L)    Proxy Access Nominee Eligibility. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 7, the Corporation shall not be required to include in its proxy materials, pursuant to this Section 7, any Proxy Access Nominee (i) who would not (a) be an independent director under the applicable rules and listing standards of the principal U.S. securities exchanges upon which the stock of the Corporation is listed or traded, any applicable rules of the SEC or any publicly disclosed standards used by the Board of Directors in determining and disclosing the independence of the Corporation’s directors, (b) satisfy the audit, compensation or other board committee independence requirements under

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        B-11


the applicable rules and listing standards of the principal U.S. securities exchanges upon which the stock of the Corporation is listed or traded, any applicable rules of the SEC or any publicly disclosed standards used by the Board of Directors in determining and disclosing the independence of the Corporation’s committee members, or (c) be a“non-employee director” under Exchange Act Rule 16b-3 or an “outside director” for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (or any successor provision) (collectively, the “Independence Standards”); (ii) whose election as a member of the Board of Directors would cause the Corporation to be in violation of this Certificate of Incorporation, the By-laws, the rules and listing standards of the principal U.S. securities exchanges upon which the stock of the Corporation is listed or traded, or any applicable state or federal law, rule or regulation; (iii) who is an officer or director of a competitor, as defined in Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914; (iv) who is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses) or has been convicted in such a criminal proceeding within the past ten years; or (v) who is subject to any order of the type specified in Rule 506(d) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

(M)    Effect of Invalid Nominations. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, if (i) a Proxy Access Nominee or the applicable Eligible Stockholder breaches any of its agreements or representations or fails to comply with any of the requirements under this Section 7 in any material respect or (ii) a Proxy Access Nominee otherwise becomes ineligible for inclusion in the Corporation’s proxy materials pursuant to this Section 7 or dies, becomes disabled or otherwise becomes ineligible or unavailable for election at the annual meeting of stockholders, in each case as determined by the Board of Directors or the chairman of the annual meeting, (i) the Corporation may omit or, to the extent feasible, remove the information concerning such Proxy Access Nominee and the related Supporting Statement from its proxy materials and/or otherwise communicate to its stockholders that such Proxy Access Nominee will not be eligible for election at the annual meeting and shall not be required to include in its proxy materials any successor or replacement nominee proposed by the applicable Eligible Stockholder or any other Eligible Stockholder and (ii) the Board of Directors or the chairman of the meeting shall declare such nomination to be invalid and such nomination shall be disregarded notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Corporation. In addition, if the Eligible Stockholder (or a qualified representative thereof) does not appear at the annual meeting to present any nomination pursuant to this Section 7, such nomination shall be declared invalid and disregarded as provided in the foregoing sentence.

(N)    Restrictions on Re-nominations. Any Proxy Access Nominee who is included in the Corporation’s proxy materials for a particular annual meeting of stockholders but withdraws from or becomes ineligible or unavailable for election at the annual meeting will be ineligible to be a Proxy Access Nominee pursuant to this Section 7 for the next two annual meetings of stockholders.

(O)    Board Determinations. The Board of Directors (or any other person or body duly authorized by the Board of Directors), at all times acting in good faith, shall have the power and authority to interpret this Section 7 and to make any and all determinations necessary or advisable pursuant to this Section 7.

(P)    Exclusive Method. This Section 7 shall be the exclusive method for stockholders to include nominees for director election in the Corporation’s proxy materials.

SECTION 8.    The annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation for the election of directors and the transaction of such other business as may be brought before the meeting in accordance with this Certificate of Incorporation shall be held on the date and at the time fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors, by a resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors.

SECTION 9.    Except as otherwise provided by law, at any meeting of stockholders of the Corporation the presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business brought before the meeting in accordance with this Certificate of Incorporation and, a quorum being present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote shall be required to effect action by stockholders; provided, however, that, subject to the provisions of any class or series of Preferred Stock, the vote required for the election of directors shall be set forth in, and governed by, the By-laws.

SECTION 10.    At every meeting of stockholders, the Chairman or, in the absence of the Chairman, the Vice Chairman or, in the absence of both the Chairman and the Vice Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer or, in the absence of all such persons, such individual as shall have been designated by a resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors, shall act as chairman of the meeting. The chairman of the meeting shall have sole authority to prescribe the agenda and rules of order for the conduct of such meeting of stockholders and to determine all questions arising thereat relating to the order of business and the conduct of the meeting, except as otherwise required by law.

B-12        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


SECTION 11.    Any class or series of Preferred Stock may exercise the special voting rights, if any, of such class or series to elect directors upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the Certificate of Designation pursuant to which any such class or series of Preferred Stock is issued or in this Certificate of Incorporation, as the case may be, in any manner now or hereafter permitted by this Certificate of Incorporation, Delaware law or the applicable Certificate of Designation for such class or series of Preferred Stock.

SECTION 12.    The exercise by the Board of Directors of the powers conferred in this Article V shall at all times be subject to any statutory or other limitations upon such powers provided by the laws of the State of Delaware.

SECTION 13.    Members of the Board of Directors may be elected either by written ballot or by voice vote.

SECTION 14.    The Corporation may in itsby-lawsBy-laws confer powers upon its Board of Directors in addition to the foregoing, and in addition to the powers and authorities expressly conferred upon it by statute.

SECTION 15.    (A) Special meetings of stockholders of the Corporation may be called only (i) at the direction of (a) a majority of the entire Board of Directors, (b) the Chairman of the Board of Directors, (c) the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors or (d) the Chief Executive Officer or (ii) by the Secretary of the Corporation at the written request of holders of record of at least 20% in voting power (the “Required Percentage”) of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting (“Voting Stock”) as of the record date fixed in accordance with this Section 15 to determine the stockholders entitled to deliver a written request to call such meeting, if such request complies with the requirements set forth in this Section 15. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Certificate of Incorporation, this Section 15 shall be the exclusive means by which a special meeting of stockholders may be called, including, without limitation, a special meeting called for the election of directors.

(B)    Only a stockholder that is a holder of record of Voting Stock on the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to request the call of a special meeting may submit a request to call a special meeting. Any stockholder seeking to call a special meeting to transact business shall, by written notice, signed by the stockholder or a duly authorized agent thereof, to the Secretary of the Corporation personally received at the Office of the Corporation, request that the Board of Directors fix a record date to determine the stockholders of the Corporation who are entitled to request the call of the special meeting. A written request to fix a record date shall include all of the information that must be included in a written request to call a special meeting from a stockholder, as set forth in the succeeding paragraph (C) of this Section 15. The Board of Directors may, within10ten days of the Secretary of the Corporation’s receipt at the Office of the Corporation of a valid request to fix a record date, fix a record date to determine the stockholders entitled to request the call of a special meeting, which date shall not precede, and shall not be more than10ten days after, the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted. If a record date is not fixed by the Board of Directors, and subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements and the rules of any stock exchange upon which the Corporation’s securities are listed, the record date shall be the date that the first valid written request to call a special meeting is received by the Secretary of the Corporation at the Office of the Corporation with respect to the proposed business to be conducted at a special meeting. A special meeting shall be called at the request of stockholders if, and only if, written requests to call a special meeting from holders of the Required Percentage of Voting Stock are received by the Secretary of the Corporation within 60 days of the record date established as provided in this paragraph (B).

(C)    Each written request to call a special meeting shall include the following: (i) the signature of the stockholder of record, or of a duly authorized agent thereof, signing such request and the date such request was signed; (ii) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting (including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, if such business includes a proposal to amend the By-laws, the language of the proposed amendment); and (iii) as to the stockholder signing such request, or on whose behalf such request was signed (such stockholder, the “party”), and any Stockholder Associated Person of such party (but excluding from this clause (iii) any Solicited Stockholder):

(1a)    the name and address of such party and each Stockholder Associated Person;

(2b)    as to each party and each Stockholder Associated Person, (a1) the class or series and number of shares of stock directly or indirectly held of record and beneficially by such party and each Stockholder Associated Person, (b2) the date such shares of stock were acquired, (c3) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding, direct or indirect, with respect to the business to be transacted at the special meeting between or among such party, any Stockholder Associated Person or any others (including their names) acting in concert with any of the foregoing, (d4) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into, directly or indirectly, as of the date of such party’s notice by, or on behalf of, such party or any Stockholder Associated Person, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        B-13


or decrease the voting power of such party or any Stockholder Associated Person with respect to shares of stock of the Corporation (for purposes of this paragraph, a “Derivative”), (e5) a description in reasonable detail of any proxy (including revocable proxies), contract, arrangement, understanding or other relationship pursuant to which such party or Stockholder Associated Person has a right to vote any shares of stock of the Corporation, (f6) any rights to dividends on the stock of the Corporation owned beneficially by such party or Stockholder Associated Person that are separated or separable from the underlying stock of the Corporation, (g7) any proportionate interest in stock of the Corporation or Derivatives held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such party or Stockholder Associated Person is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner and (h8) any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that such party or Stockholder Associated Person is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of stock of the Corporation or Derivatives thereof, if any, as of the date of such written request;

(3c)    all other information that would be required to be filed with the SEC if such party or any Stockholder Associated Person were a participant in a solicitation subject to Section 14 of the Exchange Act;

(4d)    any material interest of such party and any Stockholder Associated Person in any of the business proposals to be transacted at the special meeting; and

(5e)    a representation as to whether such party intends (a) to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Corporation’s outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt any of the business proposals to be transacted at the special meeting or (b) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of any such proposal (for purposes of this Section 15, a “Solicitation Statement”).

The information set forth in a request to call a special meeting shall be supplemented by such party (other than a Solicited Stockholder) by providing such supplement to the Secretary of the Corporation received at the Office of the Corporation (i) not later than five(5) business days after the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of such special meeting so that such information is accurate as of such record date and (ii) not later than seven(7) business days before such special meeting so that such information is accurate as of the tenth(10th) business day before such meeting. “Solicited Stockholder” means any stockholder or beneficial owner that has provided a request to call a special meeting in response to a solicitation made pursuant to, and in accordance with, Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act by way of a solicitation statement filed on Schedule 14A.

(D)    A stockholder may revoke a request to call a special meeting by written revocation, signed by the stockholder or a duly authorized agent thereof, received by the Secretary of the Corporation at any time prior to the special meeting; provided, however, that if any such revocation is received by the Secretary of the Corporation after the end of the 60- day period described in the last sentence of paragraph (B) of this Section 15 and if the Secretary of the Corporation previously received unrevoked written requests from the holders of the Required Percentage of Voting Stock and, as a result of such revocation, there no longer are unrevoked requests from the Required Percentage of Voting Stock to call a special meeting, the Board of Directors shall have the discretion to determine whether or not to proceed with the special meeting. A business proposal shall not be presented for stockholder action at any special meeting if (i) any stockholder or Stockholder Associated Person who has provided a Solicitation Statement with respect to such proposal does not act in accordance with the representations set forth therein, (ii) the business proposal appeared in a written request submitted by a stockholder who did not provide the supplemental information required by the second to last sentence of Section 15(C), (iii) any stockholder or Stockholder Associated Person (other than a Solicited Stockholder) who delivered a written request, or directed that a written request be delivered, is not entitled to vote at the special meeting or does not beneficially own stock at the time of such meeting, (iv) any stockholder (other than a Solicited Stockholder) or a duly authorized agent thereof who delivered a written request, or directed that a written request be delivered, does not attend the special meeting in person or by proxy to present the business proposal to be transacted at such meeting, (v) any written request to call such meeting was made or solicited in a manner that the Board of Directors determines constituted a violation of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act or other applicable law, or (vi) any stockholder or Stockholder Associated Person (other than a Solicited Stockholder) who delivered a written request, or directed that a written request be delivered, ceases to beneficially own, at any time after the delivery of such written request and before the special meeting is convened, at least the same number of shares of Voting Stock such stockholder or owner beneficially owned as of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to deliver a request to call such meeting; provided, however, that the Board of Directors shall proceed with the special meeting if, despite any action or failure to act covered by clauses (ii), (iii), (iv) or (vi) of this paragraph (D), there are still in place valid requests from the Required Percentage of Voting Stock to call such special meeting.

(E)    The Corporation shall not accept, and shall consider ineffective, a written request from a stockholder to call a special meeting: (i) that does not comply with the preceding provisions of this Section 15; (ii) that relates to an item of business that is not a proper subject for stockholder action under applicable law; (iii) if an identical or substantially

B-14        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


similar item of business (such item, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors, a “Similar Item”) will be submitted for stockholder approval at any stockholder meeting to be held on or before the 120th day after the Secretary of the Corporation receives such written request (whether such meeting is called for by the Board of Directors or otherwise); (iv) if such request is received by the Secretary of the Corporation during the period commencing 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders and ending on the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders; (v) if a Similar Item has been presented at the most recent annual meeting or at any special meeting held within one year prior to receipt by the Secretary of the Corporation of such request to call a special meeting; or (vi) if two or more special meetings have been called at the request of stockholders and convened within the 12-month period ending on the date of the receipt of such request by the Secretary of the Corporation. For purposes of this Section 15, the nomination, election or removal of directors shall be deemed to be a Similar Item with respect to all items of business involving the nomination, election or removal of directors, changing the size of the Board of Directors or filling vacancies or newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors.

(F)    The Board of Directors shall determine the place, and fix the date and time, of any special meeting called at the request of one or more stockholders in accordance with the provisions of this Section 15. The Board of Directors may submit its own proposal or proposals for consideration at a special meeting called at the request of one or more stockholders. The record date or record dates for a special meeting shall be fixed in accordance with Section 213 (or its successor provision) of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Business transacted at any special meeting shall be limited to the purposes stated in the notice of such meeting delivered by the Corporation.

ARTICLE VI

INDEMNIFICATION

SECTION 1.    To the extent not prohibited by law, the Corporation shall indemnify any person who is or was made, or threatened to be made, a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding (a “Proceeding”), whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, including, without limitation, an action by or in the right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, by reason of the fact that such person, or a person of whom such person is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving in any capacity at the request of the Corporation for any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise (an “Other Entity”), against judgments, fines, penalties, excise taxes, amounts paid in settlement and costs, charges and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements). Persons who are not directors or officers of the Corporation may be similarly indemnified in respect of service to the Corporation or to an Other Entity at the request of the Corporation to the extent the Board at any time specifies that such persons are entitled to the benefits of this Article VI.

SECTION 2.    The Corporation shall, from time to time, reimburse or advance to any director or officer or other person entitled to indemnification hereunder the funds necessary for payment of expenses, including attorneys’ fees and disbursements, incurred in connection with any Proceeding, in advance of the final disposition of such Proceeding; provided, however, that, if required by the Delaware General Corporation Law, such expenses incurred by or on behalf of any director or officer or other person may be paid in advance of the final disposition of a Proceeding only upon receipt by the Corporation of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such director or officer (or other person indemnified hereunder), to repay any such amount so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined by final judicial decision from which there is no further right of appeal that such director, officer or other person is not entitled to be indemnified for such expenses.

SECTION 3.    The rights to indemnification and reimbursement or advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this Article VI shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses may have or hereafter be entitled under any statute, this Certificate of Incorporation, the By-laws, any agreement, any vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his or her official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office.

SECTION 4.    The rights to indemnification and reimbursement or advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this Article VI shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer (or other person indemnified hereunder) and shall inure to the benefit of the executors, administrators, legatees and distributees of such person.

SECTION 5.    The Corporation shall have power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of an Other Entity, against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person’s status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability under the provisions of this Article VI, the By-laws or under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law or any other provision of law.

        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement        B-15


SECTION 6.    The provisions of this Article VI shall be a contract between the Corporation, on the one hand, and each director and officer who serves in such capacity at any time while this Article VI is in effect and any other person indemnified hereunder, on the other hand, pursuant to which the Corporation and each such director, officer, or other person intend to be legally bound. No repeal or modification of this Article VI shall affect any rights or obligations with respect to any state of facts then or theretofore existing or thereafter arising or any Proceeding theretofore or thereafter brought or threatened based in whole or in part upon any such state of facts.

SECTION 7.    The rights to indemnification and reimbursement or advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this Article VI shall be enforceable by any person entitled to such indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses in any court of competent jurisdiction. The burden of proving that such indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses is not appropriate shall be on the Corporation. Neither the failure of the Corporation (including its Board of Directors, its independent legal counsel and its stockholders) to have made a determination prior to the commencement of such action that such indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses is proper in the circumstances nor an actual determination by the Corporation (including its Board of Directors, its independent legal counsel and its stockholders) that such person is not entitled to such indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses shall constitute a defense to the action or create a presumption that such person is not so entitled. Such a person shall also be indemnified for any expenses incurred in connection with successfully establishing his or her right to such indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses, in whole or in part, in any such Proceeding.

SECTION 8.    Any director or officer of the Corporation serving in any capacity (a) another corporation of which a majority of the shares entitled to vote in the election of its directors is held, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation or (b) any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or any corporation referred to in clause (a) shall be deemed to be doing so at the request of the Corporation.

SECTION 9.    Any person entitled to be indemnified or to reimbursement or advancement of expenses as a matter of right pursuant to this Article VI may elect to have the right to indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses interpreted on the basis of the applicable law in effect at the time of the occurrence of the event or events giving rise to the applicable Proceeding, to the extent permitted by law, or on the basis of the applicable law in effect at the time such indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses is sought. Such election shall be made, by a notice in writing to the Corporation, at the time indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses is sought; provided, however, that if no such notice is given, the right to indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses shall be determined by the law in effect at the time indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of expenses is sought.

ARTICLE VII

LIMITATION ON LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS

SECTION 1.    A director of the Corporation shall not be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (iA) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (iiB) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iiiC) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (ivD) for any transaction from which the director derived any improper personal benefit. If the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended after approval by the stockholders of this Article VII to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law, as so amended.

SECTION 2.    Any repeal or modification of the foregoing paragraph by the stockholders of the Corporation shall be prospective only and shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.

ARTICLE VIII

ADOPTION, AMENDMENT AND/OR REPEAL OF BY-LAWS

The Board of Directors may from time to time (after adoption by the undersigned of the original By-laws) make, alter or repeal the By-laws by a vote of two-thirds of the entire Board of Directors that would be in office if no vacancy existed, whether or not present at a meeting; provided, however, that any By-laws made, amended or repealed by the Board of Directors may be amended or repealed, and any By-laws may be made, by the stockholders of the Corporation by vote of a majority of the holders of shares of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Corporation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors shall not have the power or authority to amend, alter or repeal Section 3 of Article I of the Corporation’s By-laws.

B-16        The Wendy’s Company 2016 Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO


 

LOGOLOGO

 

THE WENDY’S COMPANY

ONE DAVE THOMAS BOULEVARD

DUBLIN, OHIO 43017

 

  

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 25, 2016.June 4, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.instructions.

   
   

 

VOTE BY TELEPHONE -1-800-690-6903

   

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 25, 2016.June 4, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and follow the instructions provided.

   

 

VOTE BY MAIL

   

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

   

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

   

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by The Wendy’s Company inas well as the environmental impact of mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards notices of Internet availability and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E05765-P77431              E45255-P06559                          KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — —  –

  DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

 

 
     THE WENDY’S COMPANY

 

         

The Board of Directors recommends that you voteFOR the election of each of the director nominees named below:

     

 

 

1.

  

Election of Directors

      
   

 

Nominees:

  For  Against  Abstain
   

1a.

  

Nelson Peltz

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1b.

  

Peter W. May

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1c.

  

Emil J. BrolickKristin A. Dolan

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1d.

  

Janet HillKenneth W. Gilbert

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1e.

  

Dennis M. Kass

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1f.

  

Joseph A. Levato

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1g.

  Michelle J. Mathews-Spradlin  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1h.

  

Matthew H. Peltz

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1i.

  

Todd A. Penegor

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1j.

  

Peter H. Rothschild

  ¨  ¨  ¨
   

1k.

  

Arthur B. Winkleblack

  ¨  ¨  ¨
           
YesNo

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

¨¨

 

 

The Board of Directors recommends that you voteFOR proposals 2 3 and 4:3:

 For   Against  Abstain 

2.  

Approval of amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to provide stockholders with a “proxy access” right.

¨

¨

¨

3.

 Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.2018. ¨ ¨ ¨ 

4.3.

 Advisory resolution to approve executive compensation. ¨ ¨ ¨ 

 

For address change and/or comments, please mark this box and write them on the reverse side where indicated.

  ☐      

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

 ¨
YesNo 
 

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners must each sign. If shares are held by a corporation, partnership or other entity, please sign in full entity name by authorized officer.

 

   
    
               
  

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

 

Date            

 

     

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 

Date            

 

  


LOGO

ADMISSION TICKET

THE WENDY’S COMPANY

20162018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, May 26, 2016Tuesday, June 5, 2018

10:00 a.m. (EDT)

The Wendy’s Company

Thomas Conference Center

One Dave Thomas Boulevard

Dublin, Ohio 43017

This is your admission ticket to the meeting. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, you will be required to present this admission ticket and a valid government-issued photo identification. This ticket admits only the stockholder listed on the reverse side and is not transferable. FurtherAdditional admission requirements and instructions for attending the meeting are contained in the Proxy Statement.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — 

E05766-P77431

E45256-P06559        

 

 

THE WENDY’S COMPANY

20162018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WENDY’S COMPANY

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2016JUNE 5, 2018

 

 

The undersigned hereby appoints Emil J. Brolick, Todd A. Penegor, Gunther Plosch and Dana Klein,E. J. Wunsch, and each of them, with full power of substitution, as lawful agents and proxies, to vote all the shares of common stock of The Wendy’s Company (the “Company”) that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at the Thomas Conference Center located at the Company’s corporate offices, One Dave Thomas Boulevard, Dublin, Ohio 43017, on Thursday, May 26, 2016,Tuesday, June 5, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. (EDT), and any adjournment or postponement thereof, upon the matters set forth herein, and in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.

 

This proxy, if signed, dated and returned, will be voted as specified on the reverse sidedirected herein by the undersigned.If this proxy is signed, dated and returned without specifications,such direction, the shares will be votedFOR the election of each of the director nominees listed on the reverse side (proposal 1) andFOR proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

 

All proxies previously given or executed by the undersigned with respect to the shares of common stock represented by this proxy are hereby revoked. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the accompanying Notice of 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 20152017 Annual Report to Stockholders.

 

IMPORTANT - This proxy must be signed and dated on the reverse side.

 

If you vote by telephone or via the Internet, please DO NOT mail back this proxy card.

Proxies submitted by telephone or via the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 25, 2016.June 4, 2018.

 

 
    
   Address change/comments:       
  
          
    

    

      

(If you provide any address change and/or comments above, please mark the corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side